Who shot Malik, and why?
Who shot Malik, and why? Not Charly, as right-handed shooter.
Fingerprint, to set up Charly, but how was the print on what gun?
Confused, as especially Zach mentions Malik in response to Charly's
mention of his son.
The lawyer, using the gun Charly gave him when he was hanging with the cat.
Why, I'm not sure, unless he wanted Charly arrested for his own protection, or maybe because he was afraid.
That bit did puzzle me. I guess there's also the possibility that they took the gun off the lawyer when they lifted him and it was Zac or one of his guys. Don't really see why though, as he seemed determined to kill him rather than have him arrested.
Another loose end - Zac ended up in prison - Pistachio should have been shown having him killed there. Why? Why not.
Good film.
The lawyer, using the gun Charly gave him when he was hanging with the cat.
Why, I'm not sure, unless he wanted Charly arrested for his own protection, or maybe because he was afraid.
That bit did puzzle me. I guess there's also the possibility that they took the gun off the lawyer when they lifted him and it was Zac or one of his guys. Don't really see why though, as he seemed determined to kill him rather than have him arrested.
I think there's 3 reasons it cannot have been the lawyer.
1. He had no motive to do it.
2. We know he was picked up by Zac's henchmen. It is almost inconceivable that they would have let him keep his handgun while they took him to see their boss, and almost equally unlikely that they would have returned it to him when they let him go.
3. Charly declared them even after firing the gun to deliberately miss. If Charly thought the lawyer had also tried to frame him (as well as being inadvertently in on the hit) then they wouldnt have been even.
I think it makes more sense that Charly saw the gun and realised his enemies must have taken it from his friend without killing his friend. That clue was all that it took for him to realise that there was only one person who Zac might have brought on the attempted hit who would have been loyal enough to Charly to deliberately miss.
However, as to who actually did kill Malek, that is left unclear. I can only assume that it might have been one of the other assassins acting without Zac's authority. Perhaps that person had a double motive. (a) wanting the police to save him from Charly; (b) wanting to get rid of someone that Zac liked, and therefore improving his own career prospects.
Alternatively, it could have been done on Aurelio's orders, assuming that Aurelio had some people inside Zac's organisation who were able to steal the gun.
.
share