The Wigs


In case the title didn't make it obvious, I'm from across the pond (US). I've watched most of the series by this point and I still can't stop giggling everytime I see everyone in the courtroom with their white wigs that don't fit their hair at all.

I know, I know it's a cultural thing. And I'm not intending any disrespect so please no blowing in about how ignorant Americans are or anything like that - I know we have cultural crud you all laugh at as well.

What I wanted to ask though, was do Brits really find the wigs to be more professional looking than without?

I ask because one episode had the lead telling Alisha to wear the wig while she was questioning a defendant in the box. He mentioned that she looked like his PA without it and that jurors loved the wigs.

So is it true? Do you guys love those wigs?

reply

No I find it faintly absurd and all a bit Monty Python. The robe is fine to show continuity and gravitas.

reply

I'm from across the pond, too (U.S.), and the wigs look ridiculous - especially on Alesha. No disrespect to the British culture (or ANY culture). The wigs seem like they might be rather distracting.

reply

It is tradition and you can say it means people know who the judge is.
All the calling each other "MY LEARNED FRIEND"and so on seems old fashioned to Americans,and to many British people but it all comes from us being an old country.
The fact that they dress funny does not (hopefully)mean that the judges are stupid or out of touch.

reply

The wigs date back from a time where all people of social status wore wigs. Quite simply, the courts just did not keep up with the times and when wigs began to decline in popularity.

At present, wigs are now usually only worn in criminal proceedings and certain appellate courts. Until recently, solicitors or solicitor advocates (such as Alesha)were not permitted to wear wigs, only barristers and judges. This rule was changed, I believe, in 2008 due to solicitor advocates complaining that barristers would appear superior in the eyes of the jury and more readily believed.

There are three main arguments for keeping wigs and robes. Firstly, its tradition and the public on the whole do appear to want it retained.

Secondly, it is felt in some quarters that it helps retain the sense of occasion and grandeur of being part of a trial where a persons liberty is at stake. A criminal court is not somewhere that normal members of the public should wish to find themselves in frequently. The wigs, robes and other traditions help to reinforce that this is not to be considered a normal or preferable everyday experience.

Thirdly, there is also a train of thought that the wigs help to 'mask' the appearance of the judges and barristers. Of course, the names of these people are public knowledge and are mentioned frequently in trials. If somebody was keen enough to do so in the age of the internet,finding information on them would be fairly straightforward but still, your average tom dick and harry would probably have trouble recognising a judge without his wig.


I do find it slightly odd that Americans feel it looks ridiculous. It was your culture and legal system as well once!

reply

Thank you, that was well stated and informative. The tradition does continue somewhat here in the states, judges still wear the robes and are addressed as "your Honor".

reply

Nicely stated, thank you!

reply

One thing to add, is just like the theory with uniforms in some US schools and most international schools, by judges and barristers or lawyers dressed similarly and in a standard fashion it keeps the focus on "the law" and "the trial" and in school on "learning" as opposed to fashion although that seems to work less well for a variety of off-topic reasons.

reply

An excellent point about the logic (part of the logic) behind uniforms of all sorts. Thanks!

"All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people."

reply

In Canada, lawyers wore wigs, but do not anymore.

reply

err...didn't George Washington wear a wig? i guess he was british, too...

reply

The OP was asking why those in British courtrooms still wear wigs. She was not asking why they wore wigs hundreds of years ago.

And while the way you chose to phrase your point could be taken a few different ways - no one said that wearing a wig makes one British. So however you meant it, your comparison makes no sense on any level.

reply

You need to take a chill pill.

reply

This has been the British tradition for hundreds and hundreds of years. Yes, I love the wigs and the accents, everything about this series.

reply