Krishna is considered, till now, a mythological figure, and not a historical figure with a known date of birth and period of existence, as told in this documentary.
If this documentary tells lies about such obvious truths, it only reflects on the integrity issues and wrong intentions of the doc. makers.
Is worse than that. Krishna's actual Biography is nothign like Jesus's, as he was raised a shepherd, his Mother Devaki wa snot a Virgin, and his primary role in Life beyind teachign was as a King. He grew up and slew a tyrant hwi had userped his Fathers Throne then lead his peopel to Righeosuness and Peace.
He also died when a hunter strich him in the foot with an arrow when he was an old man, he was nto crucidfied at 33.
Then again, the biographical details given to Horus abotu his Viig Birth and 2 disiples and sermon on the modn and his Cricifixion nd ressurecion are bogus , too.
I fact, none of the pagan godmen saviours the film brign sup are True.
FYI, Jesus was not borne of a virgin, dummy. Back then they didn't have calendars and calculated time by the movement of the stars in one sky.
Simply put (for you) he was born late August/September under the zodiac sign of Virgo.
Hence borne of a virgin, dummy.
Yes jesus is a mythological figure, the krishna dob was lied about in the film according tho their myths. But the jesus myth has alot of things the same as earlier gods...
My pea tastes like toast