trivia


This blows.

Finally, something has topped Dancer in the Dark for worst production values of all time. Wow, this uses the Flintstones production technique (use a still image in place of a moving picture, in this case a 35-cent post card) outside of animation, a groundbreaking first.

I especially admire the clothing that didn't exist in 1972, the video cameras that didn't exist in 1972 (evidently wireless, too, and networked, operating without electricity!), and the prison that didn't exist in rural Mexico. Supremely well thought out.

Mmm, yeah, this is really going to get $40,000 in voluntary donations from the people who didn't bother to make ten IMDB posts in seven months.

This is the next Bourne franchise, people!

reply

It's obvious you have some kind of personal axe to grind. Your comments are so far off the mark that some kind of green monster is sitting on yoru shoulder. Jealousy is not attractive, dude. You really need help.

reply

Jealous?

Mmmmm, yes, very jealous of a "movie" where---four years later---has a full 10% of its forum posts coming from the director himself (Justin Evans), a guy making very personal attacks on IMDB members who post comments critical of his title.

Justin Evans, a real artist, and a class act. Welcome to IMDB.

P.S. You can use IMDB to post comments about titles other than your own.

reply

I see that the director of this "movie", Justin Evans, who only subscribed to IMDB 6/17/2012 as IMDB user "justin-evans-399-809578" to post a fake "User Review" of this "movie", and to post this

It's obvious you have some kind of personal axe to grind. Your comments are so far off the mark that some kind of green monster is sitting on yoru shoulder. Jealousy is not attractive, dude. You really need help.

(to which I replied, but his reply was not to reply but rather to change his name)

had by 6/18/2012 changed his user name to "Cid2054" so we won't know he's the source of 10% of the posts on his own title. As I said, a real artist, and a class act.

reply

[deleted]