MovieChat Forums > Undisputed III: Redemption (2010) Discussion > The fight scene was good but the main v...

The fight scene was good but the main villain,Dolor can't.


In Undisputed 2,Boyka the main villain remind me about Bolo Yeung as the scariest fighter,Chong Li(Bloodsport) and another dangerous fighter,Michel Qissi as Tong Po(Kickboxer).But in Undisputed 3,Boyka looks more friendly and Dolor look like a clown.

reply

1. Those other characters, Chong Li and Tong Po make Boyka seem like a saint by comparison they are so evil. Hell Boyka was so honorable that he killed his followers for cheating on his behalf while the other 2 you mentioned cheated to win.

2. Since you made the comparison who would you put your money on if Boyka (in his prime before getting his knee ruined) had to face Chong Li or Tong po (they in their respective primes too). Personally I give the size/strength and raw power edge to Tong Po and Chong Li but the speed and agility edge to Boyka, it would be quite a tradeoff.

3. Dolor was not made out to be formidable enough to be a martial arts movie villain, he only beat up ONE person before facing Boyka. What should have happened is this:

1. Sixteen fighters instead of eight, that is a very good number for this kind of tournament.
2. Both Boyka and Dolor should have had to face THREE opponents before finally facing each other.
3. Turbo should have had a second fight also winning that then instead of the guards beating the tar out of him he should have gotten owned by Dolor in the semifinal round. Seeing Turbo made into an obvious badass by winning a 2nd fight then seeing him get the crap beaten out of him by Dolor would have really emphasized how powerful Dolor was.

reply

[deleted]

I don't think the main villain's acting was that bad. The problem is that Adkins' character looked & acted much more intimidating so it was difficult to see Dolor as a real threat. Dolor was a little silly.

DISPLAY thy breasts, my Julia!

reply

Basically you want every villain to come from the same boring cookie cutter? What's the point of having a villain that has the same personality trait as the main character? As mentioned in the other thread, I thought Dolor was an interesting and unique enough villain and a good foil for Boyka, both in terms of personality and fighting skills.

reply

Dolor was a cocky character. Brought on by the fact that he was a beast of a fighter. Gaga put his faith and money in Boyka in U2 because Boyka was a beast of a fighter. So it is the same for Dolor. But the difference is, Dolor's drive was to beat up and humiliate his opponents (which he knew he could) as to Boyka having a deep personal goal to be the best fighter.

To be honest, you don't need to have more fights to establish these main characters. There was enough there to know who the main badass fighters were in the acting.

For Dolor, his swagger and over confidence, even in front of the guards, meant that he was untouchable and knew it. He could even kick their asses if he wanted. So they utilize his skills for money and keep Dolor sweet. From knowing this, you should instantly know how much of a titan the character actually. Even in his first fight, he was showing off and still whooping ass. But just imagine if he had as much focus and drive as Boyka has with his own set of skills? That would turn this character into an almost impossible fighter to overcome.


ITS OVER THERE>>>> <<<<ITS OVER THERE

reply