The whole point of a piece of art is that everyone is free to interpret it as he or she wishes. Whether it's a song, a sculpture, a poem, a picture - it is perfectly possible to draw one's own conclusions and interpretations from that piece of art. Our interpretation may be a million miles away from what the artist intended or thought about but that doesn't matter one bit.
The fact that you have a growing reputation is probably due to this very fact, i.e. that people get inspired by your photographs and can draw meaning from them.
I agree to an extent with "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar". Sometimes people overanalyse things that are, by and large, simply not there. But the vast majority of filmmakers would regard what is shown on TV in a film as extremly important. Sometimes it's an allegory; sometimes it's a precursor for what is going to happen; sometimes it's a social commentary in the context of the film (see Haneke's use of violent images in news reporting and the protagonists' indifference to it in "Benny's Video" for example).
I am not familiar with the black sheep story shown in "Ballast" but I would suggest the director has chosen this clip for a reason.
reply
share