Exactly. Being a huge fan of WKUK I watched this movie five times I think, three by myself, one with a friend and one with my mum. The first couple of times I thought that that was it, that it was just a silly sex comedy which was just what it appeared to be. When interviewed, Trevor and Zach say that they wrote the most mainstream script possible to reach the expectations of the movie studio, but something told me that they wouldn't sell out like that without leaving any 'hidden' message.
The characters are totally stereotypical: the virgin prude dude (Eugene), the horny sex-crazed dude (Tucker), the perfect, unconditional girlfriend (Cindi), the 'villain' with good feelings (Candace), the misogynistic rapper (Horsedick.MPEG), the immigrant with a crappy job (Nurse Juanita), the horny lesbians (Katja and Vonka). The setting is stereotypical too, as the ultimate place for a sex-related anything would be the Playboy Mansion itself! The plot where everything fits and ends perfectly in such a corny way is stereotypical as well, especially coming from them, whose famously 'dark' comedy sketches usually involve broken families and death. Coming from them, this screamed parody.
It's rather hard being able to distinguish a sex comedy from a parody of everything a sex comedy is supposed to be, and Trevor and Zach made that line as fine as possible. It takes several viewings to get that. The average movie goer probably wouldn't recognise it even then, because the parody in Miss March is so subtle. Movies like The Naked Mile are so bad that they could be parodies of sex comedies too, but it's somehow noticeable when the movie is actually nothing more than a bad sex comedy marketed for teenagers. One can tell by how boring it is, and this movie never has a dull moment or a filler scene. It's one ridiculous thing after another.
People criticise the bad acting in this film. It's not bad acting, it's great acting. Their mouths opened all the time is a reference to typical sex comedy acting. Watching WKUK is a proof of their versatility. They can pull off women, sick people, diamond thieves, kids, drunk dads, how wouldn't they be able to pull off two simple, unidimensional characters like Eugene and Tucker? They would have pulled them off if they had wanted to.
They gave hints on this in interviews:
1) Trevor talked about typical sex comedies having been done in the past, about his lack of interest in this genre, and about his and Zach's concern to write something their fans would appreciate. WKUK fans wouldn't appreciate a movie like this taking itself seriously, but WKUK fans would appreciate a mockery (eg. Mall Bitches), and that is what this movie is all about.
2) Zach literally said "I like to think of it as a weird WKUK thing disguised as a road trip movie".
3) I think the following quote is the most solid hint. It shows their dark humour and understanding of the complexity of people and life, something they didn't include in the movie.
“In my head Eugene and his girlfriend get together for a little bit and then they break up because their relationship becomes different", said Cregger. “Tucker doesn’t get a job as a Playboy photographer.”
“I figure that Tucker doesn’t realize his life doesn’t end up great,” concludes Moore. “He’s just in the moment. And I figure Eugene goes into another coma for thirty years (laughs). His girlfriend has kids with another guy and he has to murder her family (laughs).”
My final conclusion is that they basically laughed their @$$€$ off at 20th Century Fox, bad mainstream cinema, and dumb audiences by doing this movie, and managed to get profit from the studio itself for doing that. They counted on the fact that their fans would understand. How genius can you be? This is not the best nor funniest movie of all time, but is certainly on both lists. I can't wait for the WKUK movie, it will be even better! and ironically, easier to get.
bunch of second hand electric donkey-bottom biters!
reply
share