MovieChat Forums > Leaves of Grass (2010) Discussion > Shot location, shame on you Tim!!!

Shot location, shame on you Tim!!!


Okay, if you're going to release a movie that says "Tulsa" about 20 fuggen times... for the LOVE OF GOD, get the small things right. Such as the Tulsa Airport, WRONG. The construction during the driving scene, WRONG. The trees, WRONG.

Seriously would it have cost that much to fly the crew down to T-Town and surrounding counties to shoot the out door scenes? You were BORN and RAISED here Tim, why couldn't you have at least got the geography right???

Sigh,
Mike, T-Town born and raised.

reply

Why not get the geography right you ask? Because it made absolutely no difference to the movie in the slightest manner. Only someone from Tulsa would even notice the things you mentioned & I would guess that most of those people couldn't care less about such trivial inaccuracies. You're shaming the guy for using the wrong kind of tree? This was a movie, not a tourism ad for Tulsa. I can understand this being a casual (and very brief) topic with other locals at a bar, but not sure what the point is in posting this topic on a message board.

reply

How about actually using Idabel, or Broken Bow for that matter. And by the way, thanks for making the citizens of McCurtain County look like back woods hillbillies.

reply

Yes exactly I'm from broken bow and watching this movie just pissed me off, especially there accents I couldn't even understand what they was saying half the time, and if your gonna portray a town or county I would think you'd at least have some footage of the actual place your referencing

reply

Yes, because 'Tim' had unlimited resources to pick and shoot wherever he pleased. Right?

Here's a clue: you aren't a filmmaker. You aren't aware of what compromises have to be made, especially in terms of locations, in order to produce a film. You especially aren't aware of what compromises are further forced by shooting a film on, in this case, an *extremely* low budget (I'd guess 95% of whatever money they had went to the cast, as the film itself looks cheaper than many thesis-films I've seen).

Would it cost that much to fly to 'T-Town' and shoot there? Are you frigging kidding me? Do you often ship several tons of equipment & hundreds of people around the country with your freaking pocket change? No, you don't --- because yes, it'd cost too much.

And for what it's worth, your precious T-Town happens to be in Oklahoma, which is one of *the* most inhospitable states for filmmaking in the entire country. Don't get me wrong --- I didn't think "Leaves of Grass" was actually any good --- but it's so tiresome to be in this industry and have every yokel on the planet convinced that they know how to produce a film.

reply

@ Flanger216....I don't how slamming some guy about whether a movie shot out of location makes you a better than average film reviewer. I do know the compromises about filmmaking and doing so on little to no budget.
I do fault Tim for not getting on location shots, renting a Red locally with a 2 ton grip truck would not have killed his budget. Hell I would have done it just for the screen credit. And I was on set for Eye of God and there was far less crew on that film than Leaves of Grass.

And obviously you mention thesis films so I suspect you are an educator. Which come the term, when you can't do , than teach. Or you are one of those arm chair filmmakers that some day hopes to be hollywoods next film god.

Now you are an idiot as you have no clue as to what it took to shoot this movie and in no means were hundreds of people needed with tons of equipment needed to shoot most of this film. And since you do not even live in Oklahoma you have no clue as to the resources available. Oklahoma has one of the few remaining film incentive programs left in the US. Most states are cutting these programs or they have failed to poor management. You made a blanket statement without any knowledge of the resources in Oklahoma.

Now since you aren't a yokel. Come on lets see your demo reel filled with vast amounts of competent film making! You said you are in the industry, what as a netflix subscriber?

reply

Yeah, I'm sure Tim Blake Nelson is going to respond to you VIA IMDB, shut up Hawk, Oklahoma sucks anyways, especially there sports teams!

reply

Actually, I'd have to say Oklahoma has some pretty good sports teams. Are you from Texas? I wonder becuse obsessed fans often enjoy hating on all things Oklahoma because Oklahoma teams frequently are beating "there," sports teams..... :)

reply

"Xcuse" me, but I agree with the OP -ESPECIALLY about the trees - OK trees (natural ones, not cultivated) look stunted and gnarly when compared to the forests of much of the rest of the country - there's a huge difference. And I think most people from the "middle" states NE, KS, MO, OK, TX, AR and maybe even CO and the Dakotas would see that the landscape isn't right. Not only that, but that couldn't have been the Arkansas river - it had water in it!

And please, no lectures on the difficulties of filming locations for small budget movies - Coppolla managed to make three feature-lengths in Tulsa and environs - and all we purists asked of this movie was a few establishing shots.

I wondered about the airport and the buildings along the highway, but I've been gone a long time and knowing how Tulsa loves to pave over any empty space,I took that in stride.

I do have to say though, that I was dising Nelson's Okie accent until I looked him up on IMDB and found out that not only was he raised in Tulsa (like me) but we went to the same private school!!!!

I still don't think the accents - even of my revered Ms. Sarandon were right. I remember ages ago, seeing a dialect coach on a talk show who said that Okie was the most difficult American accent to master. It's similar to most other "country" speech of the South and West, but there's this tricky, subtle difference. In Nelson's defense, however, I don't remember any of my classmates (or myself) sounding characteristically Okie - and I have to admit that I can't imitate it either. I can do lots of other credible accents, but not my "own." So Mr. Nelson might have found himself somewhat of a stranger in his own land in this regard.

I lived in Washington DC for 20 years, and believe me, - Washingtonians, residents of a seat of global power and influence, were just as quick to see all the inconsistencies of place and geography (Hey! You can't get there off that exit!) as any provincial viewer seeing his home territory portrayed on the screen.

reply

They are in Idabel, OK at night - Outside - Under lights - In Summer - WHERE, I ask you, are the bugs?? The set should look like a Stephen King short story. Oklahoma is where all the insects go to get their revenge on humans. Clean windshield from Virginia to Arkansas - cross the state line - Horror show!

reply

Someone said the trees in Oklahoma look "stunted and gnarly" but that isn't necessarily true in the southeastern corner of the state where this was. See
www.redriverhistorian.com/mounttourlittledixie.html
for a picture of some scenery in SE Okla.

reply

This film was mostly shot in the Shreveport, Louisiana area, less than 100 miles from Idabel, Oklahoma. The landscape there is not much different from far southeastern Oklahoma.

There are two basic reasons why it was shot in Louisiana instead of Oklahoma, apart from the similarity in topography. One, the film incentive package in Louisiana is far superior to that in Oklahoma, certainly at the time the film was shot (You'd be amazed how many films have been shot in the Shreveport area over the last few years, from THE MIST to YEAR ONE to BATTLE: LOS ANGELES). The other reason is that Tim Blake Nelson had a bad experience with the Oklahoma Film Commission in the late 1990s trying to shoot his film O in Oklahoma, which poisoned his attitude toward shooting his films in Oklahoma. Hopefully some day the new people running the film commission will change his attitude, but right now that's the way things are.

However, the OP has every right to point out the errors in this film when it comes to Tulsa. It's no different from all the New Yorkers who get upset when a film set in NYC was obviously shot in Toronto.

reply

[deleted]

Some scenes/shots were filmed in a little town called Plain Dealing located in North Louisiana.

reply