"Xcuse" me, but I agree with the OP -ESPECIALLY about the trees - OK trees (natural ones, not cultivated) look stunted and gnarly when compared to the forests of much of the rest of the country - there's a huge difference. And I think most people from the "middle" states NE, KS, MO, OK, TX, AR and maybe even CO and the Dakotas would see that the landscape isn't right. Not only that, but that couldn't have been the Arkansas river - it had water in it!
And please, no lectures on the difficulties of filming locations for small budget movies - Coppolla managed to make three feature-lengths in Tulsa and environs - and all we purists asked of this movie was a few establishing shots.
I wondered about the airport and the buildings along the highway, but I've been gone a long time and knowing how Tulsa loves to pave over any empty space,I took that in stride.
I do have to say though, that I was dising Nelson's Okie accent until I looked him up on IMDB and found out that not only was he raised in Tulsa (like me) but we went to the same private school!!!!
I still don't think the accents - even of my revered Ms. Sarandon were right. I remember ages ago, seeing a dialect coach on a talk show who said that Okie was the most difficult American accent to master. It's similar to most other "country" speech of the South and West, but there's this tricky, subtle difference. In Nelson's defense, however, I don't remember any of my classmates (or myself) sounding characteristically Okie - and I have to admit that I can't imitate it either. I can do lots of other credible accents, but not my "own." So Mr. Nelson might have found himself somewhat of a stranger in his own land in this regard.
I lived in Washington DC for 20 years, and believe me, - Washingtonians, residents of a seat of global power and influence, were just as quick to see all the inconsistencies of place and geography (Hey! You can't get there off that exit!) as any provincial viewer seeing his home territory portrayed on the screen.
reply
share