MovieChat Forums > Orphan (2009) Discussion > What if Esther raped Daniel?

What if Esther raped Daniel?


even though she prefers polite middle aged men not mean boys.

reply

That would have been an interesting twist, but Daniel was too much of a jackass to her; I would have liked to have her castrate him instead.

reply

You people are really sick. She didn't do that bc she's not a complete and sick monster. That would make her a nasty pedophile and predator, instead of the fascinating and ultimately sympathetic character she was.

reply

I said it would be an "interesting twist," that isn't the same as a "likeable" one.

reply

You then said you would have liked to see her castrate a little boy.

reply

That was meant as an alternative if something along this line of nasty had to happen.

reply

Way too graphic and disturbing for me, and would have given her away rather quickly :S

reply

[deleted]

You are freaking pro-child sex, aren't you? A filthy, putrid bastard. Or maybe just a troll. Go rot in privacy and keep your perversion away from us.

reply

[deleted]

This was just a film right? A horror esque film at that? A genre where *horrific* things happen in *horror* films? This conversation makes it sound like someone is suggesting it was a fly on the wall recording of real life and this stuff really happened and the people are real....... LOL

And no, you're not a troll, English. I don't agree with all that you've said, but I get the point behind the line of questioning. Because at that point in the film, you still think she's a kid...and you know something's off, that she's mentally too old for her age, but you can't quite place it.

And in the original script, she has scissors that she puts to his eye, then down between his legs, threatening to cut it off if he speaks (with words that hint to a sexual connotation with the 'before you even know what it's for' line, and while he's in a bed), and then it clearly says in the script that she takes a moment to 'savour his fear', so she's taking pleasure out of the whole thing. That's not as clear in the film, it's clearer in the script.

So there are hints of a sexual undertone in the scene that remains firmly unspoken (and no, this is not sick, this is a well known horror writing trick if you study the craft of writing and film making, especially in the horror genre...if you trick the human brain into thinking into thinking on a sexual line about something, (even if for a fleeting second or unconsciously without you even realising that what you're seeing has a sexual undertone), when that is alongside something horrific (sometimes it's blood and gore or killing, in this case it's a teenager being terrified by a knife) then it makes the scene even more disturbing to the viewer (or reader in a book). Because they are two things that shouldn't go together, so we have a bigger reaction of repulsion to it. And it's even more so when it's subtle, because you can't put your finger on why, you don't realise there's a sexual undertone, so you don't realise that's why it's disturbing because it's alongside something horrific...it's so subtle you can't put your finger on it, you just know the scene is really flipping disturbing. It's actually very very clever and something that good horror writers use with skill in films and books and have done for decades.

So it's a very pertinent question, but I completely disagree with the idea of there being a rape between them. It would have been far too much and would have made me feel thoroughly sick.

So yeah, I don't agree with the original post question, but I can see why it was thought of by someone. And seeing as there's an actual sense behind the question, that means, English, you're not a troll, cos you weren't just replying out of nowhere for the sake of winding people up, there was an actual sense behind it.

reply

[deleted]

Ok, did you see his whole post? You said this, Saxon:

"Debatable whether a sexual exploration between them would be in any immoral anyway, if done lovingly (don't think Daniel would have objected). In fact the whole situation had potential for a very liberated and loving family unit, if she'd only had the equilibrium to grasp it!"

This isn't some subtle thing about how maybe there's sexuality involved, you blatantly just said that sex between them might be just fine if he consented, and went on to say it might have been a very cool "liberated" family unit, allowing such sexual filth. You're a sick freak.

reply

[deleted]

Try to make who you're addressing clearer.

reply

instead of the fascinating and ultimately sympathetic character she was.


I hope it was a joke

reply

No hon it wasn't, but please read the trivia if you're mystified as to why I feel that way (I think she's fascinating without it, but the trivia better explains the sympathy feeling).

reply

[deleted]

She was only interested in men her own age, not kids like Daniel. Plus he was a jackass like someone pointed out

reply

Unfortunately, many people who were sexually abused as children have the risk of ending up doing the same to others. It's called 'identification with the oppressor/ abuser/or aggressor. So her doing the same to someone else might not be out of the question. But I almost think that if Esther were to have done such a thing, the target she would take advantage of would be Max.

reply

Um, no; Esther was abused by a man, so if she had been a total monster like her worthless father, she prolly would have hurt Daniel. But she wasn't, so she didn't, and the number of abused people who further become pedos is lower than people used to think.

reply

I don't think the gender the person targets correlates with the gender of their abuser, and if it does I don;t think it happens 100% of the time. I didn't say it was common. It's a possible effect that places like foster care systems have to keep in mind. I think nowadays it's been shown that most pedophiles were not molested as children, so that excuse won't always fly anymore.

reply

Very true. But I just doubt very much she'd target Max; many who abuse again particularly despise one gender. Plus, she wanted to replace Max's mother.

reply

[deleted]

Go away you disgusting freak.

reply

[deleted]

You're the same pedo I've seen several times before and you need to get far away from here now.

reply

[deleted]

oh please.. she was a 'grown up' despite her appearance... interestingly she made her thoughts on Daniel very clear in a scene in the film.. she had no interest in him physically or otherwise, he was a little douche anyway.

reply

Wtf

reply