MovieChat Forums > Singh Is Kinng (2008) Discussion > Sounds like bollywoods going to satirica...

Sounds like bollywoods going to satirically portray sikhs..yet again


well judging by the actors, the fact it is a comedy, and even the name..bollywood is planning to show sikh's as comedic idiots with no morals. Why can't bollywood deviate away from this stereotypical nonsense? And when i say punjabis, i mean sikh punjabis who wear turbans (turbans are religious attire in the sikh religion, like the jewish yarmulke or muslims hijab - something which should not be made fun of..a sikh turban is tied, and not worn like a hat)

reply

Dont watch it then biatch

reply

[deleted]

when did sikhs become a seperate race??????

sikhs are the same race as the rest of the indians, they just follow a different religion

another thing all punjabis are not sikhs

plus bollywood cant possibly "satirically portray punjabis" as almost of bollywood happens to be punjabi

reply

[deleted]

"another thing all punjabis are not sikhs '
Exactly.Many ppl dont realise/know that.

" bollywood cant possibly "satirically portray punjabis" as almost of bollywood happens to be punjabi "
True.But isnt this movie about Sikhs?? I was just wondering because, most punjabis dont associate themselves with sikhs.On the other hand, I dont see Akshay kumar doing such a role.Happy singh will probably be a cool as *beep* surd who gets the hot girl, kicks some ass, is not in the movie only for comic factor.

You can bet on this movie making a fortune in north india.

"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."

reply

"most punjabis dont associate themselves with sikhs"

guess it depends on which punjabi, most people use punjabi and sikh interchangeably, since may people are both like me.

its clear the the bad portrayal of punjabi's that the op is talking about is the portrayal of punjabi sikhs, with turbans. like all the times johnny lever did his sardar act.

reply

U know what i mean. Everytime you see an actor dressing up as a sikh and acting like a retard, you know that bollywood has no integrity or respect for sikhs. And yes, sikhs are a different people, who were never meant to be a part of india, we saw that ever since nehru took office after the british in 1947, and after the indian government tried to mercilessly eliminate the sikhs altogether in 1984. Why live in a country where your religion is not respected..i'm sorry, i also believe sikhs are the same ethnicity as everyone else, but the politics of india does not let the sikh religion share the same importance as other religions. theres a reason why india is still known as "hindustan".

reply

Ahh, you're so full of *beep*

"sikhs are a different people, who were never meant to be a part of india"- erm, what? Where are you meant to be, then? And why are you not there?
"Why live in a country where your religion is not respected"- rubbish. India is far more tolerant of ALL religions than most other countries e.g. Pakistan. You haven't been discriminated against; all parties have suffered in one way or another at the hands of the government, so don't victimise yourself.

- do you really expect India's title to change from 'Hindustan', given you're a minority? It's your country as much as it is the Hindu's country, but you are in the minority, so stop complaining.

reply

go screw urself

reply

well its just like saying why most hollywood film main actor roles are made around white ppl and blacks have a funny black token role? because most of the people who watch holywood movies are white.

bollywood makes the movie for there main stream Hindu and Muslim viewers where as the Sikhs count for only 5%-7% of the population and Punjab region is small compared to Capitals like Mumbai and Delhi where the official language is Hindi. its not just Punjabis the same goes for Gujarati, Tamil, Nepali, Bangali even if they are Hindu they will still be potrayed as a joke like character.

Its a shame but get use to it the movie industry not just bollywood will be abit racist to its minority viewers.

reply

"bollywood makes the movie for there main stream Hindu and Muslim viewers where as the Sikhs count for only 5%-7% of the population and Punjab region is small compared to Capitals like Mumbai and Delhi where the official language is Hindi. its not just Punjabis the same goes for Gujarati, Tamil, Nepali, Bangali even if they are Hindu they will still be potrayed as a joke like character."


actally sikhs in india are NOT 5-7% of population, its more like 2.1% give or take. i know it sound low but i have looked it up MANY times. 80% are hindu, around 12% are muslim, 1.9% give or take are christian. the rest are jews, jains, and others

i dont mind a sikh/sardar being the made fun of sometimes BUT it ALWAYS happens, i agree with the part about nepali and south indian, now that i tihnk about it, you are dead on about that.

reply

I completely agree with you, it's completely ridulous now.

How many times have you seen the 'Daru Singh' and all of that nonsense? It seems like a lost cause to me though, in my eyes Bollywood is the most money obsessed movie industry (as if they all aren't I know) but the rate of rubbish compared to the extremely rare non-formuaic, serious movies is a joke.

I haven't watched a bollywood movie in years, and I don't see a reason to tbh, I feel so angry when I see the token idiot Panjabi, i can only think of Sunny Deol in Border and perhaps one of his other movies (which he probably financed) where I've seen a Panjabi in a lead role and not a total moron.

reply

there are plenty of examples of punjabi not being shown as goofballs, but for some reason its punjabi's who are sardars are the ones shown as goofballs/idiots whatever. sometimes its ok but thye do it WAY to much. johnny lever as a comical sardar was something i never minded.

reply

AdamMonroe

I don't mean to be nosey but is that your real name?

reply

[deleted]

i shud never be made fun of, bollywood has no right. Sikhism should be respected like all religions...there is no excuse for this insulting behavior.

reply

Uhmmmm No.
I hope not.
Even though it's funny... but painfully annoying.

I just saw an interview by Akshay Kumar and
he is strongly apposed to the way sardars are
portrayed in movies and he said this movie will
show them in a good light.

reply

Well its the other way round and going by the actors and directors interviews Sikhs are portrayed gloriously here...

reply

from the songs it seems as if sardars definitely know how to have their patiala pegg lol!!!

http://chroniclesofacreativewriter.blogspot.com
Bollywood's 6-months of grief!

reply

Yeah this movie looks retarded to me. But it'll make a lot of money will all the conterversy and hype about Snoop surrounding it. Clean shaven sardars are always look goofy anyways. I heard they had Askhsay re-shoot some of those scenes. I'm surprised as to why it is always hard for bollywood to find proper sikh guys, even for backup dancers? They always have some goofy dude with fake beard and pug attempting to play the dhol. And from the trailers it looks like there will be plenty of that.

Proper (realistic) representation of Sikhs in Bollywood movies in most recent memory are...these examples are far and between: LOL I can only think of 5 right now.

Border
Gadar (I hated this movie)
Jab We Met
Rang De Basanti
Maachis

reply

"satirically portray punjabis"

WTF???

If u havent noticed more than half of bollywood happens to be punjabi. Where do u think these Kapoors, Roshans, Deols originate from??? In fact think of it most of the bollywood heroes, directors, etc are punjabis. They may not be sikhs, but most of bollywood is dominated by punjabis and muslins. Only a select few are from different communities like marathis, bengalis,etc

reply

U know what i mean. Everytime you see an actor dressing up as a sikh and acting like a retard, you know that bollywood has no integrity or respect for sikhs. And yes, sikhs are a different people, who were never meant to be a part of india, we saw that ever since nehru took office after the british in 1947, and after the indian government tried to mercilessly eliminate the sikhs altogether in 1984. Why live in a country where your religion is not respected..i'm sorry, i also believe sikhs are the same ethnicity as everyone else, but the politics of india does not let the sikh religion share the same importance as other religions. theres a reason why india is still known as "hindustan".

reply

so..manmohan singh is sikh

reply

manmohan singh is a puppet of the indian government, who despite being a sikh, has taken very little action to bring justice to the sikh people.

There are still widows of sikh mean killed in 1984 who live in poverty, why hasn't he done anything?

Even the United States recognized the neglected civil rights of the sikh people in the 70s and 80s.



reply

@jaislamba
You are not a resident Indian are you??

"has taken very little action to bring justice to the sikh people."
What justice are you talking about.
Is it the compensation for 1984 riots?? Is it for the sardar jokes?
Try being specific.

"There are still widows of sikh mean killed in 1984 who live in poverty"
Umm...he hasnt done anything for the rajiv gandhi and family.I mean, cmon,Rahul lost his grandma..shouldnt he be compensated??
Get real brother,nobody gets compensated in India.Deal with it.There are plenty more innocent people dying in our country right now,how about we rather focus on them.

And why on Earth do you post your comments TWICE???Do you assume this tactic would reinforce your comments??

I live in India,and Sikhs do pretty well around here.They are usually looked upon with respect.Dont puke out ignorance on this board.

"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."

reply

You have no idea the impact the corrupt indian government has had on the sikhs. You are obviously totally blind of the neglected civil and basic human rights the sikhs had to endure at the hands of your beloved gandhis, the whole family deserves to burn in hell if you ask me. It all started with that scumbag nehru, who manipulated the sikh officials into the thinking the hindu majority government would provide all amenities for sikhs, when the british were ready to hand maharaja ranjit singh's punjab to the sikhs. We obviously saw 30-40 years later that was not the case because of his corrupted constitution changing religious temple attacking daughter indira. over 5000 sikhs were murdered in delhi in less than 3 days of rioting because of your murderous terrorizing government, and your pissing about rahul gandhi? whose grandmother was justly executed for her crimes against the human rights of a specific religious group! She asked for it. 10s of thousands of young sikhs were killed in fake encounters with police in punjab. Why was all media banned from punjab for so long? it's so the acts of your dirty government couldn't be seen by the world. Face it, in the nanavati report, there is so much evidence pointing to a full scale religious genocide that the corrupt politicians wanted to start, just so that the true sikh homeland could not be returned to the sikhs-the rightful owners of all of punjab. Punjab is ours, it was maharaja ranjit singh's before the british, and it is the backbone of india..which has no real infrastructure. I do not support any form of terrorism, thats your indian government's job, but i do support the fact that punjab is actually the sikh nation, i just wish that our sikh officials weren't so caught in the evil web of lies nehru and the congress party entangled them with. And now bollywood is trying to show it's understanding of sikhs by producing this movie? this is total *beep* for india knows not the plight of the sikhs! Vive la revolution! we will have our justice, in this lifetime or the next

reply

"You have no idea the impact the corrupt indian government has had on the sikhs"
You are right.I dont.Infact,no one does.Have you considered therapy?

"the whole family deserves to burn in hell if you ask me. It all started with that scumbag nehru"
I am with you on that one.I hate Gandhi family as well as Nehru.

"over 5000 sikhs were murdered in delhi in less than 3 days of rioting because of your murderous terrorizing government, and your pissing about rahul gandhi?"
Prove the figures.Many Hindus were muredered too.No side can be justified in a riot.At the same time,no one side deserves our pity.
Rahul gandhi was a sarcastic remark you idiot.

"whose grandmother was justly executed for her crimes against the human rights of a specific religious group"
Ya right.The whole nation is proud of Indira gandhi for teaching those moronic terrorists a lesson.If only we could do that in Kashmir,at a more severe level.

"10s of thousands of young sikhs were killed in fake encounters with police in punjab. "
Again,prove it.As for "fake encounters",who executed them?? KPS Gill.A Sikh.
Now he wasnt a "puppet",or was he???

" it's so the acts of your dirty government couldn't be seen by the world."
What THE *beep* do you mean YOURS????
WHO ARE YOU?A pakistani?Chinese?American?? If you are an NRI,then dont say "yours".If you are a PIO,then *beep* OFF.This issue should not concern you.
I dont deny our government is corrupt,but so is the case in almost every country.And it isnt as if Indian govt was corrupt only against Sikhs.

"just so that the true sikh homeland could not be returned to the sikhs-the rightful owners of all of punjab. Punjab is ours,"
Who else lives there you b.utt face??Marathis?tamils?? Here let me enlighten you.Punjab is occupied with Sikhs and Punjabis only you schmuck.
And "Punjab is yours"??? WHO THE *beep* ARE YOU???

"it is the backbone of india..which has no real infrastructure"
Ya right.If you wanna *beep* me,try harder.Dont end up making a fool of yourself.

"I do not support any form of terrorism, thats your indian government's job"
What the hell is that supposed to mean???How STUPID could you get?

"but i do support the fact that punjab is actually the sikh nation"
Nation?? Aahh..I know your type.Sitting on your laptop,far away in Canada. Never been to India,but love to tear its policy to shreds.Moving only in Sikh circles,never meeting anybody of other caste/race/ethinicity.
Your type are the SCUM of the Earth.

"this is total *beep* for india knows not the plight of the sikhs! Vive la revolution! we will have our justice, in this lifetime or the next "
HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Its because of Douchebag *beep* a.s.s *beep* suckas like you,that sikhs get a bad name.
Rot in hell btch.Sikhs like you give us Indians a bad name.Sikhs like you are bent on dividing our country on pure selfish grounds.
You all deserve to die, just like 1984.

We Indians(residents) exist in harmony.Sikhs,punjabis,Hindus live happily together.Keep your venomous crap to your "clan" over there.

"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."

reply

you are a self loving nationalistic prick aren't. You havn't even done the research to back up your defense. You still think the 1984 massacre in delhi was a riot?? who the f*K is teaching you this b*llsh*t??? The delhi massacre was no riot, it was a slaughter. Not one hindu died in the massacre, and many sikh women and children survived because they hid in hindu homes or disguised themselves as hindus. Your a retarded illiterate. Why don't you even read some history of punjab, and how the british were ready to hand it to the sikhs. It is all in the books, and they dont lie. Your distorted view of separatism is obviously deterring you ability to comprehend my argument..you think i want to divide your country? i just want the sikhs to have what was rightfully theirs, from 1947! The sikhs are living as a subjugated population in india, but of course you would have no compassion for the sikh community, one because your a fearhead nationalistic pig, and second because you just hate to see the power shift. You think i dont know india? IM BORN IN JAIPUR MORON. My family moved to canada in 1986 while i was young because they realized the unlawfulness in india, and couldnt bare to live under rajiv gundhi. I've been back since, last in 2002, and india is just a sh*thole cuz of your corrupt government. If I weren't a sikh, i still wouldnt live in india..this country's a mockery of democracy. No leader other than a hindu can be fairly elected by the hindu majority public..manmohan singh was appointed PM by sonia gandhi cuz she backed out last minute after she won the seat btw. They control the vote, while the gov't controls them..it's simple, and sikhs dont need to be a part of it. So your calling me a terrorist now? "You all deserve to die, just like 1984." ahahah come eat it b*tch, your the terrorist..you'd kill innocent ppl just to keep your country from losing punjab, thats the type you are, a cold blooded murderer, why dont you read some books a*shole. just imagine you eating dinner with your family, then a hindu mob breaks into your house, sets it on fire, rapes your wife, smashes your childrens heads to bits, then sets you on fire. Thats what sikhs experienced at the hands of your type. you f*kin murderer, go pray and hope karma dosent stick it's hand up your ass. I dont wish anyone to die, i respect all religions...but i will fight for justice, and kill whoever needs to be killed. I would never follow your ideology. KHALISTAN ZINDABAD

reply

"The delhi massacre was no riot, it was a slaughter"
Ha ha ha ha.You should try to become a script writer.

"You havn't even done the research to back up your defense"
More than history,I am aware of the present.I am aware of the current living conditions of every community.You,sitting all the way in Vancouver,have no clue about India.
Lemme guess,you are a "proud sikh",but you like to be called Jazz instead of jais/jai.Yeah,you are all the same.

"Your distorted view of separatism is obviously deterring you ability to comprehend my argument"
Not my distorted view,but my anti separatist view.And the filth you puke out on these boards,does not deserve to be called "argument".

"and how the british were ready to hand it to the sikhs"
ever heard of a theory called divide and rule.Hell,the british were even handing the nizam of hyderabad separate independance.If it hadnt been for sardar patel,India would have been reduced to nothing.Maybe you should do some research boy.We are all meant to be together.In our diversity lies our progress.Why dont you separatist fools understand this.

"you think i want to divide your country? i just want the sikhs to have what was rightfully theirs""KHALISTAN ZINDABAD "
Is there any way on earth your contradictory remarks can make sense.
Try not to make a fool of yourself.

"The sikhs are living as a subjugated population in india,"
Again,an ignorant remark.I live in Delhi,and Sikhs are not at all "subjugated" around here,to say the least.If you go to Punjab side,you can see them in full glory.

"IM BORN IN JAIPUR MORON. My family moved to canada in 1986 while i was young "
Duh...dude..you dont know India.there is no way you could.

"If I weren't a sikh, i still wouldnt live in india..this country's a mockery of democracy"
I know India has alot of corruption.I know our system is *beep* up.But dude, its mine.This is my country,I was born here and I owe my life to this land.
Even I hate the system here.Bribing each and every govt official to get any job done,rampant corruption,bastrd politicians,communal violence...et all.
But all said and done, even if I get a green card,I will never be an American.
Good or bad,this country is mine,and I can try to be a responsible citizen.
I would rather live in my own filthy land than migrate abroad,call some other country home,and be looked upon as a IMMIGRANT for the rest of my life.

"manmohan singh was appointed PM by sonia gandhi cuz she backed out last minute after she won the seat btw"
Mr.Manmohan singh has always been a respected politician.He is one of the best finance ministers our country had.Our nation respects him for that.Its only while under congress was his stature diminished.But people still talk of amazing budgets he produced for India.

" your the terrorist..you'd kill innocent ppl just to keep your country from losing punjab"
And how did you arrive on that??pray tell.

"why dont you read some books a*shole."
why dont you come here,live here for a while,assess the situation and then open your mouth *beep* face.??

"just imagine you eating dinner with your family, then a hindu mob breaks into your house, sets it on fire, rapes your wife, smashes your childrens heads to bits, then sets you on fire."
Aawww..cry me a river darling.
With all due respect for the dead,I do not wish to turn a blind eye towards the injustice.But get this,Hindus were terrorised too.We all faltered.Both Hindus and Sikhs made mistakes.But there is no point in mulling over it now and carry vengeance.We all have moved on.
I am hindu,i have grown up with sikhs,punjabis,muslims.. and never did we have even an iota of hatred towards each other.Thats the case with most Indians these days.We all coexist,despite the sad mistakes we have made in the past.
Its because of Dumb effin moronic NRIs that this irrelevant issue has been raised.

"I dont wish anyone to die, i respect all religions...but i will fight for justice, and kill whoever needs to be killed"
Again,your statments contradict each other.Funny,even spending most of your life in an english speaking country,you find it difficult to articulate in this language.
Ohh...i know.Your type usually doesnt mingle with the non sikhs.You stay closely together.Most of you "revolutionaries" run small gangs on the streets of vancouver,ruining India's name.
I detest your type,you blathering bigot.

"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."

reply

ok, first of all, none of my statements are contradictory, yours are. Since you're living in India, why is it you're so cold-hearted when I state any info about the delhi massacre. It is because you know of no one who has experienced this. Your cozy life is granted to you because you are a middle class hindu, and i understand that (it makes you invisible to the gov't). "" your the terrorist..you'd kill innocent ppl just to keep your country from losing punjab"
And how did you arrive on that??pray tell", ok i will..by stating that "You all (sikh seperatists) deserve to die", you basically told me to go die to my face, how liberal and harmonious of you. What I can't understand is why you are denying history. And anytime i make a statement, you say i should "write a script"? wtf is wrong with you? And this, spoken like a true hindustani: "More than history,I am aware of the present.", of course you are, how else can your lack of learning from the past be explained. You say if the british had their way India would be reduced to nothing, then u turn around and state the hindustani sarkar is "Bribing each and every govt official to get any job done,rampant corruption,bastrd politicians,communal violence", ahahhah, sounds pretty much a gov't that isn't even functional. And i was not undermining manmohan singh you idiot, i was simply proving that under normal voting circumstances, he would not have been elected..the general hindustani public dosent care for his accomplishments as the finance minister, all they see is religion. When i depicted my accurate details of a hindu mob attack on a sikh residence in '84, you say "cry me a river"...and then state "With all due respect for the dead,I do not wish to turn a blind eye towards the injustice." your statements are so counterproductive that your bias is totally visible to me; saying "cry me river" shows very little respect to the dead- your pretty much a 2 faced person with zero compassion. And how many hindus were killed at the hands of sikhs?? prove the figures to me, i doubt you can; it is impossible to compare hindu-sikh killings to sikh-hindu killings in the same context. ahaha nazim of hyderabad? umm i think the muslims were granted a little country called PAKISTAN by the british. You dont realize the fact that i know sikhs will never be granted a homeland, the time for that was in 1947, and now it is too late. I feel no sensitivity in your words, so i know you have a "pathar dil", and any words of revolution, or freedom fighting wont do any good. A sikh homeland is an idea idiot, a theory..given all the events that have occurred in the past, this would seem the solution, only next to a full scale compensation and affirmative action for sikhs who suffered at the hands of the hindustani gov't - if that happened, i would have very little to say. the 1984 events occurred not very long ago..you make it seem like it was in the last century; the wounds are still fresh..just ask the victims, as you will find many. Another thing, i don't live in vancouver, i don't personally know very many separatists, and i have friends from a more diverse group of faiths than you ever will. And in my eyes, saying khalistan zindabad is equivalent to you saying "jai hind", I am not praising a physical sovereign nation obviously, i am exemplifying the idea of a sikh state..they're just words which carry on the essence of a free state. oh, and i don't call myself jazz you retard, damn..you sure like to state stupid assumptions of indo-canadians that just make u look like more of an illiterate to me.

reply

"Since you're living in India, why is it you're so cold-hearted when I state any info about the delhi massacre."
I am not cold hearted.I only think that there is no point in holding grudges even today.Ofcourse you cant forget the past,but to cling on to it, and cloud your judgement in the present is foolish.

"you basically told me to go die to my face, how liberal and harmonious of you."
How does my hatred for militants equal terrorism.I want the militants in kashmir to die too.Does that make me a terrorist?

"What I can't understand is why you are denying history"
Of course I am not denying history.I only wish to let go off it.

"spoken like a true hindustani: "More than history,I am aware of the present.", of course you are, how else can your lack of learning from the past be explained."
How is your statement supposed to help your case?Isnt it relevant to live in the present.??

"hindu mob attack on a sikh residence in '84, you say "cry me a river"...and then state "With all due respect for the dead,I do not wish to turn a blind eye towards the injustice." your statements are so counterproductive "
The cry me a river was only to mock you.You speak of atrocities of 84,you speak of history,but how come you remain quiet on the incidents that led to the 84 riots?How come you remain quiet on the fact that bhindranwale was merely a terrorist who tried to separate the country.How come you remain quiet on the fact,that his death was necessary,the execution at golden temple,although extreme was effective and unavoidable.How come you remain quiet on the fact that many hindus across delhi actually sheltered sikhs during the riots.
Sadly the venom of bhindranwale has seeped into you.Probably you grew up hearing one sided accounts from your family,from idolising bhindranwale..

"i think the muslims were granted a little country called PAKISTAN by the british."
So thats the reason to give sikhs a different countries.Next on the list,marathis will want a new country.Not to forget naxals/maos who want a gorkhaland.We cannot divide india.

"I feel no sensitivity in your words, so i know you have a "pathar dil", and any words of revolution, or freedom fighting wont do any good. "
So be it.Atleast my "pathar dil" nature allows me to see sikhs as humans firsts and sikhs second.Atleast I dont go around judging ppl from their caste and ethinicity.
But now,thanks to you I will probably.I will look at every sikh from now on and wonder if he is a terrorist and wants a separate country.Thanks jais.

"A sikh homeland is an idea idiot, a theory..given all the events that have occurred in the past, this would seem the solution"
No..It isnt the solution.

"And in my eyes, saying khalistan zindabad is equivalent to you saying "jai hind","
Despite all evidence to the contrary.

"I am not praising a physical sovereign nation obviously, i am exemplifying the idea of a sikh state..they're just words which carry on the essence of a free state."
I wish to exemplify the idea of a united nation.How is that??




"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."

reply

well i guess we agree to disagree then. I did make a remark about hindu families hiding sikhs in their homes btw, in my latter posts. And i don't idolize bindranwale, i idoloze master singh tara singh, who first proposed a sikh state in 1947. Bindranwale made a huge mistake fortifying a gurudwara as holy as harminder sahib. He is the reason they attacked; i have always said that he should has held his ground somewhere else. The reason operation bluestar seems so shocking to me is the degree of the attack the hindustani army had on harminder sahib, and how they attacked on a sikh holy day, and how more pilgrims were killed than militants. I never supported any group that supported using brute force to accomplish it's goals..thats should only be reserved for self-defense, but in the case of bindranwale defending himself, he was at the wrong place. And you use the term terrorist so loosely punditz, do you even know its meaning? A terrorist is someone who attacks the public without warning or consequence, to only produce terror. I can name a few terrorists...H.K.L bhagat, jagdish tytler, rajiv gandhi, the R.S.S., nearly 1/4 of the congress party..need I name more? And yes, i acknowledge there are factions within the sikhs who have used terror to accomplish goals, but terrorist to true sikh ratio is so small that almost all sikhs (like me, who follow the sikhism that is outlined in our holybook--in political terms, i am a conservative sikh, not a reactionary) strictly reject hatred or violence against innocent ppl. It is our tenth guru who stated to protect yourself and the innocent against violent genocidal brutes (in his lifetime, the mughals; and in ours, the the hindustani government --but why would you care, you think all sikhs are terrorists, just like the politicians in your government; you are no different from them as i can see). Those who kill innocent people to keep a country together are much more evil then those who fight the government to free their own. But in delhi 84', the government attacked innocent sikhs who didnt even want khalistan or sikhistan to begin with; the 84' massacre only led to a widespread hatred against the hindustani gov't, and thus many sikhs who initially opposed a sikh state began to support it (why dont you try pointing the finger at your own government, they are the ones who instigated the widespread acceptance of khalistan, not bindranwale, after the golden temple attack, and 84' massacre, people began to see the true colours of hindustan) And the sided accounts you speak of of 84', watch a few documentaries (even on youtube), and read a few books before you spill that B.S. to me. Oh and this statement (i'm not sure if your being coldly sarcastic, or just plain evil) "So be it.Atleast my "pathar dil" nature allows me to see sikhs as humans firsts and sikhs second.Atleast I dont go around judging ppl from their caste and ethinicity.
But now,thanks to you I will probably.I will look at every sikh from now on and wonder if he is a terrorist and wants a separate country.Thanks jais." --that has to be the most contradictory statement i've ever seen.

reply

"that has to be the most contradictory statement i've ever seen."
There is nothing contradictory in that statement.

Either way,I am done arguing with you, and I guess I will never agree with you.
So I am gonna sign off.
And I only hope,that one day in our lives we are able to erase all the hatred and co exist peacefully.


"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."

reply

I respect your wish for peace, as i too want the same thing. But it is not hatred of religion, caste, or creed that drives my obsession for justice and affirmative action, it is the hatred of the disrespect/disregard of HUMAN LIFE expressed by corrupt politicians and governments; these politicians and governments who poison the delicate framework of culture and religion which is india..they are ones who give me the incentive.

reply

holy hell!
you have a lead actor playing a sikh with all the right morals and qualities of a hero of a bollywood movie.. and people are bitching here about sikhs being portrayed badly. Your timing for this bitching couldnt be more wrong. i have a sardar friend who saw this movie with me and had a blast. You guys need to freakin chill out!

reply

Shut up!!

I am a sikh living in Canada and I thoroughly enjoyed the film. I did not feel the sikh were portrayed badly at all. Yes, many of the time Sikhs' are portrayed badly or stereotyped as jokers, but it's because we have a great sense of humour compared to many Indians who don't.
I am so sick of the Khalistan Zindabad crap especially from NRI's who keep the fire alive. Most sikhs in India don't want a Khalistan. Would you live there if it became real? I didn't think so. The rest of India is thriving right now and they would do just fine without Punjab, where all the workers are from UP and Bihar by the way.

reply

"i am a sikh living in Canada and I thoroughly enjoyed the film. I did not feel the sikh were portrayed badly at all. Yes, many of the time Sikhs' are portrayed badly or stereotyped as jokers, but it's because we have a great sense of humour compared to many Indians who don't.
I am so sick of the Khalistan Zindabad crap especially from NRI's who keep the fire alive. Most sikhs in India don't want a Khalistan. Would you live there if it became real? I didn't think so. The rest of India is thriving right now and they would do just fine without Punjab, where all the workers are from UP and Bihar by the way."

good post, i agree, i'm a sikh in canada as well. the khalistan movement is over, its done, talk about it all u want. india is doing well, along with punjab, sikhs are doing well aswell. a few people keep the idea of Khalistan alive mostly because of misinformation there parents have told them OR they actally went through a lot of bad *beep* at the hands of the government and police in india back then so ofcouarse theres anger and bitterness. in another generation there will be no talk of Khalistan, it takes time to heal wounds.

also its easy to thorow around words like terrorist, the truth is more complicated, i dont consider binderwale a saint or a terrorist, just like indira gandhi and the government at the time werent all bad or good, its complicated but black and white. there are to many conspiracy theories and misinformation floating around.

reply

ur ignorant simple.

one thing is true goverment of india is messed up but the same goverment lets a SIKH become a prime minister.

If India was a Neo-Hindu country then the goverment will not allow this. I hate indira ghandhi and to be honest that entire family.

India's ppl (hindu, muslim, sikh christian, jain, jewish, buddhists) decide the next prime minister not the goverment because its a democrocy.

i got alot to say that can challege your entire statment but its to early in the morning here.

reply

manmohan singh is a puppet of the indian government, who despite being a sikh, has taken very little action to bring justice to the sikh people.

There are still thousands of widows of sikh men killed in 1984 who live in poverty, why hasn't he done anything? There are several thousand families across northern india who don't how or why their family members were murdered in staged encounters by the police. There has been no compensation for anything!

Even the United States recognized the neglected civil rights of the sikh people in the 70s and 80s.

After all this, the government expects us to forget the fight for our freedom, and bollywood goes ahead to make mockeries of sikhs.


reply

mate, i just retruned from watching singh is king, its a mindless entertainers, no logic, some genuinely funny moments, great songs and akshay kumar...

i am a jatt sikh and live in delhi, and all i can say, i am proud of being an indian and a sikh, and the rest is immaterial...the kind of crap i read here on this post was juvenile
all i will say is,- as the title says it best - singh is truly king...
and in punjab even hindu punjabis say sat sri akal instead of namaste...coz in punjab, the hindu punjabi and the sikh punjabi are the same except for the turban

in the various posts i read about the khannas and the roshan and the deols being punjabi - yes they all are, except for one difference - the khannas, roshans, kapoors are all hindu punjabis and the deols are jatt sikh punjabis -

have a good life all, and learn to coexist -
by the way besides singh being king, brando is also king.lol

"Im just a bum sitting in a motor home on a film set, BRANDO said, and they come looking for ZEUS".

reply

i dont disagree with you on the 1984 issue. You miss out on a key element on that issue the indian army sent to amristar majority of them were sikhs. All sikhs not only in punjab but in haryana, delhi, nepal, jammu... know that khalistani rebels are no good for the country or punjab (why is it you see a lot of sikh men joining the indian army each day even after 1984) and there is a huge majority of the Indian army that are sikh.

This is a fact that khalistani rebels are aided by the pakistani and chinese goverment to weaken india. Why are these true khalsa sikhs putting weapons in the golden temple is that not sacrilege? These same rebeles take young kids from gudwara's put a gun in there hand and tell them to fight for khalistan and its been reported by a number of sikh families in the punjab region.

I agree that bollywood is BS and so is the indian goverment the way they treat the minority of the people in India not only sikhs but community of hindus as well. It is also true that manmohan is a puppet and all the ghandhi family from sonia to mahatma should not even be allowed in the goverment I mean no one likes the ghandhi family - Rajeshtanis, Gujaratis, Tamils.... Hindutva, Rss, Tamil Tigers, Khalistani rebels, Nepal Insurgents and the list goes on.

im more on the side of a bhaghat singh and nathuram godse they are the true heroes and the goverment should be run by them sort of people.

and to the people out there who are offended by mahatma comment I mean come on back in the day before he was some type of Icon not a lot of people liked him for taking pakistans side! did they? I can tell you this much there was some joy between the hindus when ghandhi was killed lol.

reply

haha since when are more sikhs joining the army after 1984? more sikhs were in the indian army when the british were colonial rulers of india! I personally know for a fact that sikhs were kept to minimum in all the armed forces of India around the time of 1984; they were even kicked out of the police force!

reply

manmohan singh was appointed by sonia gandhi after she won the election, he was not directly elected by the public..and this cosmopolitan voting populus u speak of is overshadowed by a huge hindu majority; which will vote for only a hindu prime minister because they do not see the credentials or accomplishments of a candidate, all they see is religion. read my other posts to get the full understanding of my logic.

reply

[deleted]

Well they've got Muslim lead male actors that dominate Bollywood. That doesn't mean that Indians think that much differently about Muslims though.

TBH I don't think it is offensive in trying to perpetuate negatives about Sikhs. They seemed to show that Sikhs can have a big heart and it sure didn't show Sikhs as being weak; instead they were involved in organised crime...

My only issue with it is that it doesn't try to represent Sikhs properly and the film seems to just be capitalising on the whole Sikh angle to make money.

The propect that Bollywood is using Sikhs as jokers/minstrels to line their own filthy pockets is appalling.

reply