Disapointed


I was disappointed with "Heaven on Earth". I recall reading somewhere that with this movie Mehta's intention was to show what the immigrant experience was like in Brampton and that she herself was unaware of the Punjabi community in Brampton as she had resided in downtown Toronto all her life. While I am sure Mehta did her research of the "Brampton Punjabi" experience, her lack of familiarity comes through and ultimately makes the movie fall flat.

The movie starts out strong with some beautiful filming in India. However, as soon as the character Chand lands in Toronto, the scripting and acting becomes weak. While many aspects of her new family ring true, the scenario and setting aren't believable. For example, the scene where Rocky first abuses his wife just doesn't seem likely. I know a real-life Rocky and Chand and the nuances of such a relationship aren't explored. I also don't particularly like the domestic abuse angle the movie takes. I am not saying domestic abuse does not happen in the Indian community and that it's not a valid story to tell. I think the movie could still have shown the misogyny present in Indian culture and how it's exasperated in the immigrant experience, without having to boil down into the stereotypical "he hits her".

I particularly loved the filming of the couple at Niagara Falls in winter, showing the awkwardness of her bundled up in a big parka wearing traditional Indian clothes. The feeling that those shots created should really be where the movie had gone. She should have shown Brampton for its full glory; Brampton should have been a character in the movie. Being a sub-urban development outside of Toronto with a large Punjabi population, who have really melded the Punjab into their Canadian experiences.

And ultimately the whole magic/cobra thing was a big risk which failed. One of the end shots was cool where she had the cobra around her and was proudly proclaiming her innocence – but that shot didn't justify a confusing (and unsatisfying) plot twist.
Love her work and hope her next movie is better.

reply

It saddens me greatly that typically only the abused "get" this film. Many others rush to critique it for its brutality, invalidating us all by calling it stereotypical and unrealistic.

I understand the film's subject may not explore the original poster's perspective of one particular abusive relationship. However one should not assume all domestic abuse cases present identically. Opinions that the first abuse scene "doesn't seem likely" miss the authenticity and depth of exploration Mehta truly gave the subject. For those who don't believe abuse at times can start this nonchalantly, yes -- a resounding YES -- it can and does happen this way. And the film does not stop there. In point of fact, it goes beyond what some see as unlikely to a much harder truth to accept: how domestic violence thrives with systemic / social conspiracy.

Claiming the movie "boil[ed] down into the stereotypical 'he hits her'" fails to recognize the subtle relationship nuances depicted -- not just for the husband but for everyone. Each character's varying degree of complicity in the abuse and his/her personal struggle with it is demonstrated beautifully. On one extreme, the mother-in-law's powerful jealousy is juxtaposed against helpless chattel-like Chand, fabulously challenging our need to blame traditional gender roles. On the other end of the spectrum a curt exchange at work shows how indifferently Chand's employer tosses aside her rights by giving her earnings to her husband. And somewhere in the middle, in the conflict of the youngest children, in the outrage of the co-worker, is a call to action for all. Yet there are those who dismiss it without pity or shame.

The level of isolation some victims face is so staggering that society is, just as depicted, but a mere transition between scenes of fear, abuse, drudgery, false hope and abject despair. There are countless Chands for whom this is truly, bone-chillingly authentic. Showing more of Brampton, or any venue for that matter, would have detracted from the protagonist's perspective and the realism of her stark isolation forcing a retreat to imagination. Ultimately it was insanity, manifest as the Cobra, that forced her to go against what everyone told her to accept as normal. Here indeed is the film's true departure from reality; for many can attest that such insanity as self-preservation and the audacity of hope rarely goes unpunished by the abuser and conspirators. Instead, miraculously, Chand is permitted to find her freedom. However I can see the reason for and forgive the departure from reality here. It serves to inspire victims to have faith and fight for their survival, no matter what the apparent risks or costs, since few others will.

It is with both outrage and defeat that I write this in hope that some will come to believe in this film, this plight, this stain on society, but knowing most will not. I am saddened by what this teaches me about our world. A thing so heinous can become so mundane as to be callously dismissed by those who do not wish to face it.

reply

i agree with you ..unfortunately women-abuse exists in our society in some form or another in almost all levels of society at-least in the typical sub-urban and urban Indian middle class with which i am familiar however we always try to downplay it in the name of our culture..our society at-least now-days tends to adopt a very simplistic view and always avoid exploring the root causes and remedying them..

reply