I think the wide variance in the direction these people’s lives have taken is what makes this such an interesting and compelling doc. It’s kind of like one of Michael Apted’s “Up” films for a bunch of Z-movie actors and director.
Most actor profiles you read or watch are canned, controlled, and spun so they make their subjects look as appealing as possible. Since these aren’t really actors, they had no press agents or marketing folks to answer to (or to hold their hand) so we’re seeing real people’s lives.
Some parts were sad, but then some people’s lives are sad, and sadness is part of everyone’s life to some extent. The actress that played the mom was the most difficult to watch, as whatever her “complications” are that she mentions several times in her time on screen seem to be ruling her life. Her opinions/delusions (“Troll 2” is comparable to Bogie-Bacall films) would strike nearly anyone as pathetic, but I wasn’t laughing at her, nor were the filmmakers. She seemed to have serious mental issues.
I almost thought the director was in a way more pathetic than the mom. He seemed perfectly sane and even successful to some extent, but somehow is not in on the joke. How can a man be so in denial about the “esteem” his most famous work is held in? Everyone except him gets credit for being a good sport about their role in what is truly an incompetent and too-weird-to-be-believed product like “Troll 2.” But he honestly doesn’t get it. How is this possible? That’s the enduring question posed by “Best Worst Movie.”
-------------------------
I have meddled with the primal forces of nature and I will atone.
reply
share