MovieChat Forums > Frankenweenie (2012) Discussion > Why so many bad reviews?

Why so many bad reviews?


Reading through this message board i've noticed that there is a lot of hatred towards this movie.

I personally thought it was a masterpiece, typical of tim burton to create a faultless movie and typical of complainers to fault it. It was an emotional rollercoaster from start to finish, fantastic animation, lovable characters, originality, excellent setting and an overall brilliant movie.

I don't think half of the complainers know what's involved in stop motion animation, anyone can pick up a camera and make a movie but stop motion is on a whole new level. As far as stop motion animation, this movie is a work of art.

reply

Beats me, I'm an inclined stop motion fan already. It's plain dumb to say you don't like it because it's in black and white if anyone has said that. That's automatically losing credibility of obviously shallow opinion. Guess they don't get the charm of moving puppets and how hard that can be to accomplish this well without looking hokey. Not only that the story has depth. I like how Victor looks like Victor from Corpse Bride in child form!

reply

Most of the whining sissies are young kids who know nothing about motion pictures made before about 1980, so if there aren't car chases, simulated sex and lots of CGI -- in living, bloody color -- these clowns automatically ignore it.

Though they'll cream their jeans over some piece of trash like Avatar or the latest regurgitation of the zombie films.

reply

What? Avatar's awesome. I agree with your other points though, trailers don't guarantee what you think.

reply

Or maybe they're just people who don't share the same opinion as you?

reply

87% with a 7.6 average on RT makes it one of Burton's best reviewed films.

reply

Because it had no heart.

Technique and "Burton", and endless ham-fisted references to a few horror classics don't make a masterpiece. Heart and Soul do. This had neither.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
I can understand how the hommages to older horror or so much overly defined 'genre' of Burton, that perhaps slowly has started to bore recent audience (the trick might get old) can overshadow this though.
I personally did sort of experience the old passion of what I liked about atleast a few (Corpse bride, Scissorhands and Ed wood(Nightmare before christmas is Henry Sellecks!) of his movies in this one.

reply

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
In my taste it could even be taken further though; what if Sparky had started to crave for human flash, or would mutate worse and worse; while such things happened, would he still see Sparky as sparky?
And the cat had to turn into a monster, and was sort of treated from that point on as a repulsive monster, while it might have been interesting if it hadn't....so maybe the movie was too 'safe' and and Burton has not found his Burton back.

I can understand how the hommages to older horror or so much overly defined 'genre' of Burton, that perhaps slowly has started to bore recent audience (the trick might get old) can overshadow this though.
I personally did sort of experience the old passion of what I liked about atleast a few (Corpse bride, Scissorhands and Ed wood(Nightmare before christmas is Henry Sellecks!) of his movies in this one.

reply

[deleted]

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
In my taste it could even be taken further though; what if Sparky had started to crave for human flash, or would mutate worse and worse; while such things happened, would he still see Sparky as sparky?
And the cat had to turn into a monster, and was sort of treated from that point on as a repulsive monster, while it might have been interesting if it hadn't....so maybe the movie was too 'safe' and and Burton has not found his Burton back (or he just was never the Burton we had in mind: the audience outgrew him...if I make sense).
Also, maybe the Burton Schtick, the hommages to classic movies, might in that prospect overshadow the actual story, but I think it might always have with some viewers. I personally did enjoy it though and felt since a long time his movies hadn't had soul like this before.

reply

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
To my taste it could even have been taken further though, also having in mind Burton's usual thematics of horror; what if Sparky had started to crave for human flash, or would mutate worse and worse; while such things happened, would he still see Sparky as sparky?
And the cat had to turn into a monster, and was sort of treated from that point on as a repulsive monster, while it might have been interesting if it hadn't....so maybe the movie was too 'safe' and and Burton has not found his Burton back (or he just was never the Burton we had in mind: the audience outgrew him...if I make sense).
Also, maybe the Burton Schtick, the hommages to classic movies, might in that prospect overshadow the actual story, but I think it might always have with some viewers. I personally did enjoy it though and felt since a long time his movies hadn't had soul like this before.

reply

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
To my taste it could even have been taken further though, also having in mind Burton's usual thematics of horror; what if Sparky had started to crave for human flesh, had maybe even eaten humans, or would mutate into something more monstrous; while such things happened, would he still see Sparky as sparky?
And the cat had to turn into a monster, and was sort of treated from that point on as a repulsive monster, while it might have been interesting if it hadn't....so maybe the movie was too 'safe' and and Burton has not found his Burton back (or he just was never the Burton we had in mind: the audience outgrew him...if I make sense).
Also, maybe the Burton Schtick, the hommages to classic movies, might in that prospect overshadow the actual story, but I think it might always have with some viewers. I personally did enjoy it though and felt since a long time his movies hadn't had soul like this before.

reply

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
To my taste it could even have been taken further though, also having in mind Burton's usual thematics of horror; what if Sparky had started to crave for human flesh, had maybe even eaten humans, or would mutate into something more monstrous; while such things happened, would Victor still see Sparky as sparky? It sure tests his love for the dog, and complicates it more.
And the cat had to turn into a monster, and was sort of treated from that point on as a repulsive monster, while it might have been interesting if it hadn't....so maybe the movie was too 'safe' and and Burton has not found his Burton back (or he just was never the Burton we had in mind: the audience outgrew him...if I make sense).
Also, maybe the Burton Schtick, the hommages to classic movies, might in that prospect overshadow the actual story, but I think it might always have with some viewers. I personally did enjoy it though and felt since a long time his movies hadn't had soul like this before.

reply

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
To my taste it could even have been taken further though, also having in mind Burton's usual thematics of horror; what if Sparky had started to crave for human flesh, had maybe even eaten humans, or would mutate into something more monstrous; while such things happened, would Victor still see Sparky as sparky? It sure tests his love for the dog, and complicates it more.
And the cat had to turn into a monster, and was sort of treated from that point on as a repulsive monster, while it might have been interesting if it hadn't (the spoiled girl could have still loved that cat with all her might)....so maybe the movie was too 'safe' and and Burton has not found his Burton back (or he just was never the Burton we had in mind: the audience outgrew him...if I make sense).
Also, maybe the Burton Schtick, the hommages to classic movies, might in that prospect overshadow the actual story, but I think it might always have with some viewers. I personally did enjoy it though and felt since a long time his movies hadn't had soul like this before.

reply

I don't know, I saw it once, but I definitely thought it had heart. I cried when the dog died, and loved the way his love for the dog overcame the fear of the undead, even if his tail fell off, it was still his sparky.
To my taste it could even have been taken further though, also having in mind Burton's usual thematics of horror; what if Sparky had started to crave for human flesh, had maybe even eaten humans, or would mutate into something more monstrous; while such things happened, would Victor still see Sparky as sparky? It sure tests his love for the dog, and complicates it more.
And the cat had to turn into a monster, and was sort of treated from that point on as a repulsive monster, while it might have been interesting if it hadn't (the spoiled girl could have still loved that cat with all her might)....so maybe the movie was too 'safe' and and Burton has not found his Burton back (or he just was never the Burton we had in mind: the audience outgrew him...if I make sense).
Also, maybe the Burton Schtick, the hommages to classic movies, might in that prospect overshadow the actual story, but I think it might always have with some viewers. I personally did enjoy it though and felt since a long time his movies hadn't had soul like this before. And also; with in mind an audience that probably exists out of families with kids, the edgy can't be taken too far.

reply

I loved it, that stop-mo fluidity, the animation is incredible, the b&w was cool ...& a movie with no heart wouldn't make me tear up every time I watch it.

Sometimes I just don't understand the attitudes that go on around these sites, it's like there are weird rules, eg: you can like James Cameron ...& you can like Peter Jackson--you just can't like both of them at the same time.

These Paranormal movies, I don't get how many people eat that crap up..an hour & a half of a vid camera in a corner watching somebody sleep walk, really doesn't seem like anything beyond a boring home movie. But they'll rate that trash high while giving a movie like Frankenweenie a "zero"...I've given up trying to figure out the logic (or rather, lack of) and watch what I like and don't dwell on what I didn't like.

reply

Bad reviews?
This is one of Burton's best reviewed films. A few bad reviews but there's always one:)
On RT it has 87%, and it got nominated for almost ever single animation award that exists

On IMDB however it's a different story. People give "0" or "1" sometimes for no reason. Sometimes so that their precious new popular movie can get more votes.

reply

Stop motion animation doesn't require sh_tty writing...

reply

Reading through this message board i've noticed that there is a lot of hatred towards this movie.
I think you should know by now, people on good ol' IMBDb can be harsher on a movie than any critic out there, ha ha. But hey, at least most of the "professional" reviews recognized what made this film good.

At any rate, I thought it was a great film myself. In fact, I think this is Burton's most impressive work in years (and I wouldn't hesitate calling it one of his best).



Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!

reply

I really enjoyed it, and thought Tim Burton took his clever short film and improved it in just about every way, adding to it without significantly changing it. The visual style was great, the comedy was cute even if not the "gut-busting" variety and there was genuine pathos, at least for dog lovers. The voice casting was just right too, with Martin Landau doing a fine job and my favorite, Atticus Shaffer from "The Middle" playing "E" Gore.

reply

Because it's pointless garbage. The critics are really high on this one.

BUGS

reply