MovieChat Forums > The Ghost Writer (2010) Discussion > A Masterpiece - Gets better and more rel...

A Masterpiece - Gets better and more relevant every year


"The Ghost Writer"
was well received when it premiered in Feb. 2010,
but there was criticism because of seemingly "far-fetched plot twists"
(The Guardian).

Even I had problems to imagine that a conspiracy like that would be possible,
but I changed my mind in the last years...

Looking at the history of spy agencies, the Church-commitee (referenced in the movie) and especially Edward Snowden's whistleblowing everything seems possible now...

- We know now that the UK and the USA indeed work very closely together
in terms of intelligence agencies ('Five Eyes'). By doing so, they are able to spy on their own citizens without breaking the laws.

- We know now that 'honey traps' and personal/sexual relationships are not uncommon tools of intelligence agencies to aquire 'human intel'.
A female C.I.A. agent to marry and manipulate a British politician who becomes the Prime Minister later, is in the realm of the possible.

- We know now that total US surveillance IS reality:

The first Ghostwriter didn't want to tell Rycart on the phone what he discovered and only said "It's in the beginnings...". This phone call must have been intercepted by the US agencies, who told Amelia (Kim Catrall) to take care of the manuscript because there might be a security risk, she said at the end.

The so-called 'far-fetched' conspiracy that "The Ghost writer" uncovers before he's killed seems more and more plausible, possible and realistic.

We are in the same position as 'The Ghost' (Ewan MacGregor) in the movie:
We only know what we see and have huge blind spots.
We never get the big picture.

'The Ghost Writer' represents the C.I.A. as the invisible ghostwriters of
international politics and history.

This is a great film, more relevant now than it ever was.

And: It's funny, moody and stylish.

reply

Excellent post! I totally agree with you, Naples.

http://vincentandmorticiasspeakeasy14846.yuku.com/directory

reply

Thanks!

Today I read a very interesting article that makes the conspiracy in "The Ghost Writer" even more believable...
It all seems credible now ;-)

Ever heard about a US program called
"International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP)"?
Former PM Tony Blair knows: He was a participant.

WikiLeaks asked "Is the US IVLP the world's most important human intelligence coup?" [Twitter, 22.4.2014]

They suggest that IVLP might be a front for gathering intelligence on future leaders to better influence and control them in the future...


Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12880901

29 March 2011 Last updated at 11:29, 22.4.2014

How do you spot a future world leader?

By Jon Kelly BBC News Magazine

A US scheme to pinpoint future VIPs has spent 70 years introducing power-brokers-to-be to the American way. So how can you tell who will one day be a head of state? They're out there, somewhere, embarking on their relentless climb to the top.

The next generation of politicians, cultural pioneers, business executives and media voices are starting their first jobs, desperate to escape obscurity, determined to make a name for themselves.

All you have to do is find them.

Predicting who will one day run our lives might not be an easy task, but a little-known scheme run by the US State Department has demonstrated an uncanny capacity to pinpoint these leaders-in-waiting.

It has received little attention during its history, but since 1940 the International Visitor Leader Program (IVLP) has proved remarkably prescient when it comes to guessing who might one day govern the planet.

As part of the highly prestigious - and expensive - programme, participants are hand-picked to spend typically three weeks visiting Washington DC and three additional towns or cities, meeting their counterparts and other VIPs and experts - all highly valuable networking experience for any ambitious young man or woman on the climb.

Of the current cabinet, some 11 members are alumni of the scheme, according to the US Embassy in London. Former prime ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Margaret Thatcher and Edward Heath were all participants early in their careers.

Nor are British heads of government the only ones to have been talent-spotted. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, his Afghan counterpart Hamid Karzai, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Zimbabwean premier Morgan Tsvangirai are among serving leaders who have passed through the project's ranks.

In the UK alone, over 2,500 citizens have travelled to the US as part of the IVLP. But for those hoping to apply for this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, admission is strictly invitation-only.

Conspiracy theorists warn the scheme is all about an imperial power meddling in the affairs of sovereign regimes, seducing their future political leaders and moulding them into Washington-approved candidates.

One recent attendee is Victoria Eastwood, who was working as a producer on Channel 4 News when one of her State Department contacts with whom she would arrange US government interviewees for Jon Snow nominated her for the scheme.

In 2009 she was taken to New York, Nebraska, and San Francisco, where she was introduced to former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

The visit did not alter the journalist's scepticism about the 2003 invasion of Iraq, with which Ms Rice was closely associated. But she acknowledges that the experience deepened her appreciation of how the American system operates and, in turn, ensured her coverage of US affairs could offer an insider's perspective.

"I was quite conscious that I didn't want to go on some kind of propaganda trip," Victoria says.

"But what they are doing is exposing you to people in power so that if I'm looking at something like Iran sanctions I know the person who's responsible for putting that policy into practice."

(...)

Prof Giles Scott-Smith, an international relations expert at Roosevelt Academy in the Netherlands, has studied the programme extensively. He acknowledges that being invited onto it carries a high degree of prestige and can bring participants into elite networks earlier in their careers than might have been the case otherwise.

(...)

He says the programme succeeds because it comes with no strings attached, which overcomes many sceptical invitees and allows them also to feel immune from accusations of manipulation.

But he believes it is nonetheless a prime example of US "soft power" in action, shaping first impressions and casting America within the context of one's own ambitions, aspirations, ideas, and possibilities.
In the London embassy, he observes, staff do not so much conduct their own surveillance as tap into existing local knowledge about potential rising stars.
"They really keep track of what's going on in the House of Commons very closely," Prof Scott Smith says. "They'll have one political officer who is assigned to follow each political party.


Prof Jonathan Gosling, director of the Centre of Leadership Studies at the University of Exeter
"It may be their personality, it might be their ambition, it might be their staying power, it might be what they've achieved already.

(...)

"It's not just a US operation. It's about mutual interest. There's this ongoing fascination with the US. We're still in a world where we look to the US for leadership, for influence, for potential sources of solutions."

Not everyone views the programme so benignly, however. Intelligence expert Robin Ramsay, editor of Lobster magazine, accepts it is likely that all the beneficiaries of the project's largesse would have risen to the top anyway.
But he argues that the notion of a major power courting the future elite of another nation state offers cause for alarm.
"I'm concerned because I think Britain should be independent," he says. "I think the idea of a foreign country interfering in our politics is worrying."


Certainly, a 2006 study by Prof Scott-Smith (PDF)[Download on Site] suggests the programme was used in the early 1980s to reach out to young Labour politicians, including Blair and Brown, at a time when scepticism about the Atlantic alliance was prevalent within the party.

However, Philip Breeden, press counsellor at the US embassy in London, insists such concerns are misplaced. He says the scheme works to the advantage of both his country and those of the programme's alumni.

"There's an obvious benefit to have people in public life understanding each other better across national boundaries," he says. "This is people-to-people diplomacy, not country-to-country diplomacy.

"What we're looking for is people who are making a contribution to their community, who we think will advance in their chosen career path, who will serve as a good link between our two countries."

Whatever your view of the scheme, one truth remains unquestionable: our future elite are still out there. And if anyone can find them, the Americans know how to do it.

reply

Excellent post. Ty for sharing.

My 100 favorite movies http://www.imdb.com/list/Uvw_F2_GMx8/
What are your favorites?

reply