'Backward' in time !


Cmon the asylum cant even get their trailers right, let alone their movies

'The elite military team were sent backward in time' oh so they didn't go back in time they went 'backward!' in time rofl

at this point the trailer lost the little credibility it had

reply

I don't understand your point. If you never existed in a certain past (i.e. you were never there before), you couldn't go 'back' there. You can't return to somewhere you never were.

You normally move forward through time, so to go into the past would be to move 'backward' in time.

Not trying to argue with you, and I don't work for Asylum, I just don't know what it is you're saying they did incorrectly.

reply

To go back to a time you have been before you would travel backward in time, and like wise, to go back to a point in time you've never been to before you would still be travelling backward in time.. Thats how I understand English anyway.. :-)

Travelling backwards or forwards, to just travel back would be, as already said, would infer travelling back to somewhere you have already been.

reply

I think backward in time makes sense.
If you travel to the future they say you went forward in time.

My HS Football coached told us "Tommorow, today is gone forever".
My reply was that tommorow, today is yesterday, today is yesterday's tommorow and yesterday is gone, yesterday's gone. So, don't stop thinking about tommorow!

reply

Its pretty simple..they went backward in time....but this is absolutely one of the very worst movies ever. The acting, well, you would think they would cast some people who had at least diven by an acting school at some point in their lives. The script was terrible and I'm amazed the director has been allowed to direct anything since.

reply

I think this'll be a good film...

Why bother making a sequel to a 1980's film if they didn't have a good script..?

reply

DUH! its not meant to be a sequel. Its meant to capitalize off 10,000B.C. you remember, the movie about the white guy with dreds who was searching for his girl and happened to free the slaves from Africa along the way. Even an asylum butcher job can't be as bad as that movie.

*shudders*

reply

What? It has nothing to do with 10'000 BC - it is a sequel to The Philidelphia Experiment...

www.bluspykz.co.uk
www.myspace.com/bluspykz

reply

wouldnt it be "dreads"?

RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

reply

This movie sucks movie sucks big time...i couldnt even watch it till the end...

reply

Ya what everyone else said...... You can't go back to somewhere you have never been before. I had to type it, I'm here...

reply

Just saw this. REAL bad film. Laughed my way through it all. Cheesy special effects, lame dialogue, and bad acting pretty much the death knell for this trash.

reply

I didn't get one thing, they went back in time... Wtf are they doing in a city?!

/Sorry for my english, I'm Swe xD

reply

They go back in time only to RETURN TO THE FUTURE(tm).

reply

I was waiting for some serious sh*t to happen.
Damn time machine mever hit 88!

Jordan Godzilla Sullivan you stop that right now!

reply

This is a bad movie. Midway through the one actor sums up the movie stating, "Stupid piece of shi*". The only good thing about the movie was the Ruth character, she is a cutie with a short skirt and you can see her butt when she runs.

reply

I guess going 'backward' in time is rewinding your own time. So It doesn't really make sense since none of those guys have lived for a million years? I haven't seen the movie, and I don't want to.

___________________________________________
The worlds gonna end? Better get the booze.

reply