Where did Meg Ryan's plastic surgeon study medicine???
So that I won't send my child there...
THE WORLD IS YOURS
So that I won't send my child there...
THE WORLD IS YOURS
I'm of the opinion that it had to be the same person who patched up Jack Nicholson as 'The Joker' after the chemical accident.
shareamen to that, the only thing that kept me vaguely interested in this piece of *beep* movie was my fascination with how much meg ryan's face kept reminding me of the joker!
share
Wow, this movie sucked - true - but you're way, way outta line. She's a pretty enough woman, especially for her age. She may not be your cup of tea, but holy crap. How shallow can you be?
Facts are facts, regretable though they may be.
I have been a huge fan of Meg Ryan ever since the 1980's, I think that she is one of the most beautiful and talented women in Hollywood. Still stunning in her forties, she did not need any plastic surgery.
I can only imagine that the pressure to keep up with younger actresses overwhealmed Meg's better judgement and she agreed to have work done. However, whatever procedure she underwent has clearly been a disaster.
I just hope it's reversable.
The only person shallow here is Ms. Ryan.
This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.
On this issue, I agree with Jejozi 100%. Why on Earth did Meg do it? She didn't need to. Meg made 'The Women' just a year ealier, and anyone can see what a stunning natural beauty she had just by glancing at the DVD cover. OK, so she wasn't 21 anymore, but she was still a lot better looking than most women who ARE.
Growing older is a fact of life. Just because an actress reaches the age of 40 it does not mean that her career is over and the kindest thing to do is have her humanely destroyed by leathal injection. The industry has quite a few mature women who could teach girls half their age a LOT about being vivacious and sexually attractive.
Would all Trolls and Cyber-Pundits please take note of the following:
The beautiful faces of Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman are not the product of buttloads of botox and plastic surgery.
The grotesque visage currently belonging to Meg Ryan IS.
Oh Meg, it's so sad. You were once SO lovely...
Well said Owen, one of my fav rom com's EVER is When Harry Met Sally...hadn't seen her in a movie in several years. Finally popped in my Serious Moonlight DVD and I couldn't believe it was her...her face actually IRRITATED me (her character in the flick didn't help the irritation either). A crying shame she bought into it, there were certain facial expressions where she SCARED me!
--
I'm your average ordinary everyday, jorgeegeetooo!
Jorgito2001, you should have seen Meg's photo on the IMDb in the months BEFORE she made 'Serious Moonlight'. She looked like an absolute freak! Children would have run screaming! I'm not joking - the woman was virtually unrecognisable! By the time shooting started on the movie we could tell that it was Meg in front of the camera, even if we were dismayed at what had become of her. Still, at least we now know how the urban myth that Nicole Kidman is 'the bride of Frankenstein' and that she has 'gone under the knife more times than the Christmas turkey' got started. You want an explaination? Read on.
In the Summer of 2008 the US tabloid the 'National Inquirer' ran a series of reports that claimed Nicole was addicted to Botox injections, and - despite having been warned by doctors that her face would be left 'deformed and bat-like' as a result - was determined to continue the treatments. At first, nobody took the stories seriously. Then the British satirical magazine 'Private Eye' ran a cartoon in which a man was reading from a newspaper which announced that Nicole had 'gone for the LA look'. The speech bubble of the man read "They must mean Leslie Ash!" as he sneered in contempt. This was a rather cruel reference to the beautiful English actress who was left disfigured for life by a blundering plastic surgeon. The once-lovely Ms Ash now bears a closer resemblance to a mutated trout than to a human being. Needless to say, her career is now over.
After that, Richard E Grant made a reference on TV to his work with Nicole on the film 'Portrait of a Lady'. "That was back when she had no LIPS!" he said in a bitchy manner "Back before the..." He then stuck his lips out like Mick Jagger while simultaniously yanking the flesh of his cheeks up around his ears. Everyone roared with laughter, despite the fact that it was obviously NOT what she looked like at all. From then on, Nicole was fair game. For the last few years, the world and his wife have been loudly declaring that Nicole Kidman's face is a frozen mass of scar-tissue, and that she flies to Switzerland every six months to be re-worked from her nose to her toes. Even though it should be clear to even the most casual observer that this not the case, the story is now 'common sense'. It has become accepted as true by both the media and the public.
The strong resemblance between Meg Ryan and Nicole Kidman has often been noted in the past. The two women were good friends and could frequently be seen in each other's company. I can only assume that when the 'Botox Batface' story broke, Meg was coming out of the clinic with a scarf and dark-glasses on and was spotted by passers-by who assumed it was Nicole. After all, was she not in the papers as having botched plastic surgery? It MUST have been her, right?
I think that this is the only logical explaination.
By the way, the 'Botox Batface' story did actually have a small grain of truth in it. In a recent interview Nicole said that she HAD tried botox once - but had resolved never to touch it again once she saw the result. Would that Meg Ryan had followed her example.
yeah she used to be hot, sucked she went under the knife.
shareboo she's gorgeous. if your kid goes to medical school you should encourage a practice that doesn't involve breast implants and botox.
shareMeg WAS gorgeous once, now she's just a mess. Damn that butchering quack to Hell for what he did!
The irony is that in Meg's previous film 'The Women', she plays a woman in her forties who is RESISTING pressure to go under the knife. When her own mother Candice Bergen has a face-lift she is seen very much as a victim to be pitied. The entire theme of the movie is how women's bodies are constantly mis-represented by the media in one form or another - either for good or for ill.
In one scene, Meg's teenage daughter runs up to her mother brandishing a trashy tabloid. "Look, mom" she decares excitedly "Nicole Kidman has got cellulite!"
Meg peers closely at the photo, and replies with a sigh "No, dear. I think that they DREW that in."
Later on, the girl starts to decline meals because she wants to 'look like the models in the magazines'.
"Nobody looks like the models in the magazines!" cries Meg in alarm "THEY don't look like the models in the magazines. All those photos are airbrushed!"
The DVD even has a link to a Dove 'Real Beauty' website in which Meg speaks with great passion and sincerity about how 'true beauty comes from authenticity'.
Less than a year on, we see Meg in 'Serious Moonlight' and she looks like she's gone face-first through a car windshield! What the HELL was she thinking when she checked into that clinic?
It is seriously sad that she did not age gracefully. In contrast to Bell, Ryan looks all the more grotesque.
share