MovieChat Forums > Experiment in Torture (2007) Discussion > Which idiot gave this 10/10?

Which idiot gave this 10/10?

posted 17 years ago by darthstuey
8 replies | jump to latest

Please tell me it was a joke. This was easily the worst film ever made in the history of worst films that have been buried for a thousand years in the worst films grave yard; before being resurrected as still the worst film ever made.

This must have been made by a fifteen year old who only just came through a portal from an alternative universe where daytime soaps are the top of the highest mountain of artistic achievement- and don't come back with the 'could you do any better?' comment- Christ, anyone, with a budget and a group of women too ugly for porn and not enough talent for acting as most low level porn stars, could.

Spiderman 3 made me angry but that was actually watchable compared to this. If anyone suggests you watch it tell them you would rather have your eyeballs spooned out. It doesn't even pass as so bad it's mildly good. It makes Catwoman and Bloodrayne look like the greatest films ever made.

The reviewer lasted an hour- you need a medal, I had to contend with 30 mins then forwardwinding to see if it actually got any better.

Somebody please prevent the people who made and released this from ever doing so again.

[–] Youcanmakeabettermovie 17 years ago

I agree. Between the shaky camerawork and the dimly-lit poor acting this was pure torture to watch.

NoMatterHowMuchYouThinkYouLoveSomebody,You'llStepBackWhenThePoolOfTheirBloodEdgesUpTooClose.

[–] ami_blu 16 years ago

I attempted to watch this film last night (I fell asleep 2/3 into it, but I'm surprised I made it that far!). This movie was terrible! The acting was pathetic. It seemed like I was watching someone's homemade video. It's amazing that crap like this gets made at all.

Life's a garden. Dig it.

[–] buddy3_16 16 years ago

It was probably some of the cast members, crew or people the producers paid. Certain studios are notorious for paying people to come onto the message boards and talk up a poor film. Plus when there's a small film like this it's not uncommon for the actors to have the time and ambition to come on a pump up their films.

I don't think it would be too amusing for the youngsters if I conjured a demon from hell for them.

[–] jackiebarber 16 years ago

love the title of the film, Got all excited thinking this would be a great film. I was so bored I kept watching it must of been 40 mins into movie and thought I can't take anymore of this cr@p. It was painful to watch because of the awful acting bad camera work I have to say after 40 mins I started to fall alseep lol. Will add while watching it one of the girls looked like she needed a wash her skin was murky If that was me I would of been mortified

[–] coflorida 16 years ago

whoever gave this 10/10 was either:
1.high
2.drunk
3.mentally retarded
or all the above

[–] saldirai 16 years ago

or a cast member :)

[–] CorumJI 16 years ago

> or a cast member :)

Heh. Probably the Director. Duh.

"You just don't understand my art" -- LOL.

[–] CorumJI 15 years ago

I'm 20 minutes into it, and the thought running through my head is that the director went to a film school run by the director of "Manos, Hands of Fate", easily the worst movie of all time. This does improve on that a notch, as apparently someone associated with the film grasped the concept of pulling focus... But that's literally the only thing I've seen which is an improvement on Manos, so far. It's got everything Manos does --

a) Pointless characters introduced then "disappeared".
b) Pointless killing of random individuals for no clear reason (even a slasher film does better at "justifying" the deaths)
c) Lots and lots of irrelevant dialogue
d) Lots and lots of useless passing scenery to pad the film out.
e) Lots and lots of other shots with no dialogue and no relevance to the plotline. Wait. IS there a plotline? Ah. No. That's the problem!
f) lots of shots of an apparently pretty well-builtup & busy lake where the house in which the events take place is supposed to be. Hardly a secluded location to do a lot of killing.
g) lots of ridiculously dark footage in which whatever the hell is supposed to be going on is completely or nearly completely indecipherable.

I'm impressed. This may actually be the second worst film of all time. I'm not sure if I'm going to actually make it to 45 mins. Nope. Not going to. This is a movie that clearly needs Joel or Mike and the Bots...