MovieChat Forums > Sauna (2008) Discussion > AWFUL movie... 5 LETTERS A W F U L...!

AWFUL movie... 5 LETTERS A W F U L...!


I am not gonna write many things about it...
although I have tons of things to say after WASTING 1 hour and 15 mins...

only wanna say...
I just wonder... Does the WRITER of this story knows?
The first CEMENT factory on this planet has been established in England - UK
during 18th Century...

Just could not understand an armoured concrete building in the middle of nowhere at 14th Century in the movie... Also the movie says :) It is probably established years before ( guess could be 100 yrs ago ). So imagine a Cement Sauna during the 14th century :))))

Plus... Although these bad remarks... I like nordic countries music understanding... They really do great in music industry...
And I liked the soundtracks of this movie...

The entire movie recieved 1 from me...

Liro Kuttner & Antti Jussi Anila... Hope you do a little bit better next time:)
But I dont think I will be watching...


--------------
Even if I dissaprove what you think! I will defend your right to say it!

reply

So it was bad because it had a cement building in the 14th century?
Actually it's 16th (almost 17th) century in the movie, but whatever.

reply

the movie is awful just because of the cement sauna? seriously?

there is always someone that have to cry for every single thing you know
if the sauna was a wooden hut like the rest of the houses he would have whined about the sauna not being as powerfull or frightening as it should be

don't get discouraged, the movie is great(as the OP would say) 5 LETTERS G R E A T!

reply

So it was bad because it had a cement building in the 14th century?
Actually it's 16th (almost 17th) century in the movie, but whatever.


You know, the more u open your mouth the more u put your foot in it. My uncle use to always tell me ppl makes azzes out of themselves when they don't read things thoroughly. She opened her comment by saying this, "I am not gonna write many things about it...although I have tons of things to say after WASTING 1 hour and 15 mins...". So no, the cement bldg wasn't the only problem w/ the film. I also responded to your comment on my string. If u can't accept constructive criticism than you have serious self-esteem issues pal

reply

""I am not gonna write many things about it...although I have tons of things to say after WASTING 1 hour and 15 mins...". So no, the cement bldg wasn't the only problem w/ the film."

Thanks for stating the obvious you *beep* idiot.


"If u can't accept constructive criticism than you have serious self-esteem issues pal"
Just because I reply to your stupid posts of "I didn't like it because I only watch things that are explained to me because I'm a dumb hillbilly and I have no imagination what so ever." Doesn't mean I actually made the movie.

Hajoo siihen.

reply

Yeah, Yeah, and how about that GUY WITH NO FACE - He should be in hospital, not roaming around in a forest scaring kids!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I was like OMG and WTF??!?!?

While watching the movie I knew there would be some KIDS who will gripe and moan here because there was a concrete building in a movie telling about late 16th century.

You know what material did the ancient Romans use when they built dome of Pantheon? Aqueducts?

Portland cement was developed in England in early _19th_ Century. I guess this is what you are talking about. But as Wikipedia tells us: "Many ancient civilizations used forms of concrete using dried mud, straw, and other materials."

But even if we don't care about historical stuff, may I ask: SO WHAT?

As the movie tells us, this building is a mystery, no one knows who built it and why? What it holds in? We don't know. Only thing we know is that it's not good.

For me it was the best thing in this movie.

reply

The Sauna made from cement was symbolic and to add to its eerieness, showing it's not from this world or time, so it stands out. It's meant to be the "thing that should not be" and gave a lot of power to the movie.

Also, a cement sauna was hinting to us that this village is not really "real", as were the villagers who represented the people the older brother killed (compare the numbers).

You can interprete something supernatural into it (like maybe hell or purgatory), or just assume the brothers lost their minds because they could no longer cope with what they did in the war.

reply

Frisil's 100% correct. The sauna looked the way it did to let the audience know that something is wrong. In a movie like this you'd think someone would be happy for a freebie like that.


PAX...

reply

Once again, spot on Frisil! It was one of the most obvious devices that the director used to suggest an allegorical element, the village wasn't necessarily real and was there to represent Eriks own personal hell.

reply

I have not yet seen this movie, but defenately I will.

Well, shortly; for me, at once when seeing just the trailer, it was very clear "the sauna" was something symbolic and not from the same world where the characters are from.

It is something you can't explain, just like the Monolith in Kubrick's S.O. 2001.

Like said, not seen the movie yet... Maybe tomorrow night, after the real sauna ;-)

reply

Haha comparing Kubrick's monolith to a modern day cement sauna? laff laff lols lols!

Sorry Eurotrashians, but the cement sauna was a very serious error in a surprisingly effective and well done film. Minus points for you and the film for that!

reply

Thanks for minus points ;-)

Now after seeing the film, after listening director's commentary on DVD, bathing in finnish "savusauna" and having a beer, after visiting an eroded russian sauna made of concrete (yes this is true) and having some vodka, I still stick in what I said earlier...

reply

FFS Some people should just bash their heads against a wall.

"Haha comparing Kubrick's monolith to a modern day cement sauna? laff laff lols lols! "

Would you care to explain why is it not comparable? And before you get even more idiotic, let me put it as clear as if you were 4 years old. He was not even comparing the films or the greatness of Kubrick's monolith compared with the Sauna. But a monolith in the middle of fkn apes definitely wasn't built by the apes, was it? So perhaps it kind of works as a counter point to the OP.

One idiot comes in and says the film is stupid because of a cement sauna. He doesn't blame the faceless ghost inside, but the freaking cement sauna! That makes perfect sense.

Then someone makes the obvious of pointing out an example, like that one of the monolith in the middle of apes, but obviously the baboons around here cannot grasp this simple idea and rant like "BUAUAHHAHAHAA!!! Monolith P@WNz the Sauna!"

Christ sake. Christ sake. Christ sake. Did you guys even read the freaking title of the film?

It's called SAUNA!

Is it so unbearable that it was made a little different? And how do you know it's cement? Maybe it's just cement pretending to be something else. Would that be ok?

Maybe his clothing and weapons weren't the correct ones for that period either. But what the fk in the world does that matter?!

It's a mysterious Sauna in the middle of nowhere built no one knows by whom or when and then this bunch who have sandbags for heads come here to rant about it being cement!

I just can't get a hold of myself. I get out on the street and these guys are everywhere! You get distracted for a second and BOOOM they suck you into their dark world of trollism and idiocy! I can't take it anymore!!!! GAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!

HELP!



reply

With all due respect, metro west dude, I think you take the "concrete sauna" - as many others in the Sauna forum - too literally in the film. As a Finn, I can tell you the place does not look like ANY type of sauna from ANY century, not on the outside or from inside, let alone the place it is built on, no matter what material it would be. Therefore, it cannot be considered as an anachronism, but a symbol of something alien, out of this world and/or (possibly) metaphysical. Movie-wise, I'm 100% confident that there is a very valid reason, why the building looks like it belongs very strongly in some other time and place.

The construction is a very bizarre looking element, very out of place lying in the midde of a shallow swamp pond. Something mystic, sinister and odd. The monk scripture in the film says that one of the monks who found the site and the building in the first place, think it looks like a sauna to them, since they really can't comprehend what the building actually is. Of course, all this is open for a viewer intepretation, as it should be - this movie offers little answers but a lot of questions and possible theories. Without answering anything, it makes us think of the possible explanation.

As few other moviegoers, I also got strong Tarkovsky and Stalker vibes from the swamp scenes, in a good way. Finland is far from being a cradle for a good horror-influenced films, let alone ones at least tampering with the symbolics, metaphysics and philosophy. I see Sauna as a well thought-out genre opening, not perfect but a step in good direction.

"The horror... The horror."

reply

laff laff lols lols!

...and about 20 minuspoints for that.

-- Powerslide --

reply

Are any of you familiar with plaster?
You know: the stuff Scandinavians (and I'm sure other countries) have been coating the insides and outsides of their churches with since the early middle ages?
It looks remarkably like cement - especially from a distance.

The movie had problems I agree, but the sauna itself definitely wasn't one of them.
_____
There is no Emoticon for what I am feeling..!

reply

I agree that the cement sauna was just too strange. That wouldn't have been an issue IF the characters had found it weird too. But they don't. They just see that extremely unusual construction in the middle of a swamp and oh, well, it's just a sauna! They don't even visit it at first. The sauna was one reason among several why the movie didn't work for me. Some of the authors' ideas could have worked I think if played differently. The script needed some polishing and rewrites; the beginning especially was awful.

__________________________
Last watched: http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=7838626

reply

First of all, the movie quite deliberately lays out in a conversation about the "sauna" that in fact it wasn't a sauna; it's actual purpose was unknown and it was there long before the village so we have no idea who built it. Also, we don't know that it was cement, and even if it is, cement was used by the Romans, who made it with rock and burnt lime. The movie calls it a sauna because it provides some kind of sin absolution/judgment that cleanses the soul.

reply