MovieChat Forums > Nanjing! Nanjing! (2009) Discussion > Where was Chairman Mao during all this??...

Where was Chairman Mao during all this????


For those who know the history...was he still alive? and why didnt the U.S help China??

"They snappin pictures of my brain
trynna get my mind frame!"

reply

For those who know the history...was he still alive? and why didnt the U.S help China??
Of course Mao Tse-tung was alive in 1937 (the setting of the movie)-- how else could he establish the People's Republic of China in 1949?

As for why the US didn't help China... I thought it was common knowledge that the US stayed the hell out of World War II, because they were profiting from it-- that is, until the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. Then it become the "right thing to do" for the US to "saving the world".


"I don't go to movies to escape reality: I go to experience life in a raw, intense way"-- S. Copley

reply

Mao was the enemy of the Nationalist government at that time(the government shown in the film) he probably went into hiding.

reply

Actually, Communists and Nationalists already formed United Front against Japanese that time. Mao and the Eighth Route army fought in Northern China.

reply

Ties actually between the Communists and Nationalists actually broke down later on in the war and Chiang Kai Shek even labelled the communists as a bigger threat than the Japanese. Mao thought the same way.

Let the world change the punishment for sexual-related crimes to execution

reply

[deleted]

I thought it was common knowledge that the US stayed the hell out of World War II, because they were profiting from it


Funny, it seemed like Chamberlain was trying to do the same thing at that time...

I AM right remembering it was him that said "Peace in our time"???

I AM right remembering that the UK's and France's promises to defend Poland were little more than vacant posturing at the time of the fall of Poland, right? (Causing the "Phony War.")

I AM right remembering that Great Britain was pushed off the European Continent in about six weeks, correct? (The same amount of time as the Rape of Nanking...)

The United States has never sought colonies in foreign lands. Hong Kong was a British Colony. The UK had major interests in Shanghai. Where the hell was Britain - the most powerful empire in the world at the time - when the Japanese were taking all their Asian colonies from them?

You want to compare our ideologies of US isolationism again the European policy of laying down and spreading their legs for the Nazis and The Empire of Japan, I'm willing to go toe-to-toe with you any time.

..Joe

reply

The United States has never sought colonies in foreign lands.


Haha, good one! Tell that to Cuba, the Philippines, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, the Marshall Islands -- and don't forget the Monroe Doctrine! Or should I say the "stay out of the Western Hemisphere European powers so the U.S. can *beep* with Latin America" Doctrine.

reply

I AM right remembering that the UK's and France's promises to defend Poland were little more than vacant posturing at the time of the fall of Poland, right? (Causing the "Phony War.")


Please, reread your history.

France and Britain had just emerged from a catastrophic world war (France had lost 3 million of its men to that war) and were still recovering from the effects of the economic collapse that had swept the world. Britain was also without much in the way of a wartime army at this point. Chamberlain's policy was meant to buy time for Britain and France to build up their armies and prepare for the inevitable.

Limit of the Willing Suspension of Disbelief: directly proportional to its awesomeness.

reply

The UK is busy fighting off Germany during the Japan occupation on China. That's why most of their colonies are unprotected like Malaysia and Singapore.

The US did has colonies. The sex slaves by the Columbus and the African slaves by the Columbus jr. Or when they they forced took the Indian's land and celebrate the whole things as Thanks Giving Days. Even now they still invade others countries in form of economics and wars for resources.

reply

I don't think the US gave much assistance to China in 1937, but FDR did approve all sorts of covert aid to the Chinese eventually, and before the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.

I think if the US public had been put to a referendum vote on whether or not to aid China against Japan in the years 1937-1940, the US public would not have supported the aid. The US economy was still in the lurch and it's unlikely the public would've supported any significant efforts to aid foreign countries, particularly poor, non-white ones. So it's interesting that a President basically ignored democratic concepts of majority rule and used his Presidential authorities to launch aid for China out of a one-man humanitarian desire and not a democratic desire.

Think about how the US public payed no attention to the wars in Central Africa during the last 20 years. 4-6 million war dead and the US public didn't give a crap the whole time. America cared more about Kosovo in the late 1990s, and its mere 2,000 war dead (attributed to Milosevic) than Central Africa, despite the situation in central Africa being far worse. Clinton gave the green light to Kosovo, but not to other wars. It really shows how powerful the US Presidential office is, how they can set the national agenda and the media's attention, and how the American public has so little influence on US foreign policy (in the short term particularly).






reply

I'm surprised this hasn't been noted. Anyone remember the Flying Tigers? The US was covertly fighting in China with pilots under the flag of the Nationalist China government. The Flying Tigers was a huge success and a chance for Americans to get some real wartime experience (just as they did in England, flying under British or Canadian colours [I'll even use the british spelling;) ]).

It appears they didn't fly combat missions until a few days after Dec 7, 1941, but it shows that there was more going on than trade.

One must also remember that territorial boundaries are not as they were in 1941, nor were the general feelings between our countries. The US held the Philippines as a territory (my grandfather was in Manila on Dec 7 when Japan started bombing). There was also a growing disdain as each government played off each other's refusal to give in during trade and 'peace' talks (the US demanded japan's pull back from offensive moves and reduce armemants while threatening to cut off oil and resources such as steel. Japan's move to south-asia was to gain some of these).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_tigers

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

the generic assessment of this era in my modern history class, was that Maos communists avoided any real heavy lifting of fighting the invading Japanese, leaving it overwhelmingly to the Nationalists, while carefully arranging their propaganda to exaggerate their role and claim significant battles and victories out of very small ones.
You can see the angle there, the Nationalists knock themselves out against the Japanese, the Red Chinese preserve their strength for overwhelming Chiang after the war with (hopefully) the Japanese threat and occupation defeated by someone else (as it was).
LOL, thanks for providing the Nationalists' propaganda side of the story, namely:

1) the Nationalists' being distracted from destroying communists by the invading Japanese;

OR

2) the Nationalists' being distracted from repelling the Japanese by the rebelling communists;

So that everyone knows, either which way, it was the communists "fault" that the Nationalists "gave away" North-eastern China, was thoroughly unprepared for the invasion of Shanghai/Nanking, etc..

The simple reason why the communists didn't have to do any "heavy lifting" during the Japanese invasion was because they were not the "de facto" government of China-- the communist "regime" was recognized by no one but themselves, except maybe Comintern.

The Japanese needed to shock and awe China into surrender-- because they NEVER planned or had the resources to physically conquer every inch of China-- and so naturally concentrated their energies on Nanking (the Nationalists' Capital) and then Chunking (the Nationalists' Reserve/Back-up Capital).

But the Japanese also spent the entirety of their campaign trying and failing to bomb the communists out of Northern China... so I can assure you that the communists "reputation" amongst the people in the parts of Northern China-- which they held against the Japanese-- needed little "propagandizing".

Well, now you have both sides of the story-- all you need now to complete the picture is to have some right-wing Japanese to tell you why China NEEDED to be invaded by Japan (e.g. bringing peace and progress to China/Asia by imposing "pax Giapponese") or how they LEGALLY ruled/represented China (e.g. through "Manchuria", or the surrendered "Nanking regime/government", etc.).... LOL



"Because bad movies deserve to be hurt back!"-- Spoony

reply

As per my Chinese Government class at Cornell, the Nationalist and Communist agreed to a truce to jointly fight the Japanese and settle their differences later. Chiang Kai-Shek then betrayed Mao and the Communists launching 5 "extermination campaigns' to annihilate the communists. Mao led his communists on a "Long March" of 6000 miles into the mountains of north China consolidating his army while converting the people in the countryside to his communist dream. He created the concept of guerrilla assaults, farmers by day, soldiers by night. Chiang was ruthless and deserted Nanking with his officers and left a small battalion in Nanking which was instructed to fight to their death.

reply

The order of events is a bit off: Chiang's attacks on the Communists (late 1920s and early 1930s) and the Long March (1934-1935) happened before the Second United Front truce. It's true that the Nationalists and Communists were allies prior to Chiang's attacks (the First United Front) but that was to fight Chinese warlords, not the Japanese.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

He was fighting the japanese in the north of china. he probably had no clue any of this was going on. And keep in mind his china was not as strong as the one in control of Nanjing

http://oi41.tinypic.com/e67kmc.jpg
Formerly known as DanteRussia💏

reply