BOAN coming out people scared..FSOJ comes out people are fine..

So I guess Glory and Amistad are similar movies as well?

reply share

add reply

formatting help

What you are insisting is that a movie cannot have a white actor acting in a benevolent manner toward a black character. Or that a white actor cannot play the lead in a movie where there are supporting black actors.

thats not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying the vast majority of the stories and movies coming out of hollywood are either told from a white savior position or the benevolent white helper.

Name a story in the last 20, 30 years set in the slave era that shows blacks taking action on their own. By themselves For Themselves not because some nice white person told them to or gave them the idea or was key to their plans. BOAN is something unprecedented IMO. Its also something that makes ALOT of people uncomfortable. I don't care if the revolt was successful or not I want to see a film that shows black people doing it for themselves win or lose. Thats what Brave heart showed.

The Scottish fought British tyranny for themselves and they LOST and William Wallace was killed, Hell, the film ends with us seeing his torture and execution. But that doesn't matter that man and his people stood up for themselves and fought and they didn't have to partner up with or need some English person to help them or give permission that it was okay or defend them against English rule. Brave heart shows those particular white people taking their lives and destiny into their own hands. And if they have to die doing it then so be it. Thats the image and message white people project to themselves and the world all the time. Its the message of 300 and King Leonidas, its the message of Gladiator. Its the message of any number of civil war stories including FSOJ. White people LOVE movies where theyre seen making a life or death fight against all odds and saying we're willing to kill and die for what they believe in. Thats their message to the world.

But that same message is something that whites are clearly uncomfortable with others doing. Like I said BOAN seems to be the first of its kind and its interesting seeing how the public accepts it. I'm seeing comment sections where people are like "this isn't going to help anything..." or "this is just going cause people to be upset and do something.." Why does a film like this cause that kind of reaction?

It has now become politically incorrect for white filmmakers to make films about black lives. Which means that only black filmmakers can film stories about black characters. Otherwise, it is cultural appropriation. And it is now politically incorrect for? films to feature supporting black actors. They need to be the leads. Do you realize most roles in movies are supporting? What you are lobbying for would inevitably result in fewer black actors getting roles? This would end up being a new kind of segregation in movies: like "Straight Outta Compton", black films by black filmmakers for black audiences?

Put it this way..how would the jewish community feel if a non jew made shindler's list? How would italians feel if a non italian made goodfellas? I'm not lobbying or demanding that blacks always be the lead or anything like that. I'm saying that american history consists of more than white men doing everything. And the stories coming out of hollywood dealing with slave era whether its civil war story or antebellum slavery story invariably slant toward how the white people do anything or feel about anything and most importantly how white people FIGHT, arm themselves and FIGHT against any threat or oppressor. But a story focusing on blacks or other nonwhites (indians, mexicans, asians etc) shows them peacefully asking, or suffering in dignified silence but they NEVER FIGHT, they NEVER PICK UP ARMS AND ATTACK their oppressors unless theres some nice white person in the vicinity to help them in some way.

Let's talk about Will Smith, a man who often has a white actress as his leading lady. Don't you find it offensive that black actresses (who have a MUCH harder time than black actors) are losing out roles to Margot Robbie? How many films have you seen where a white actor plays opposite a black leading lady (like in this film)? Not common at all. And, frankly, this shores up the stereotype of the black male celebrity with blonde arm candy.

As far as Will Smith is concerned..in films where his love interest doesn't have a significant role or is one of many like ensemble casts its usually a black woman..

Films where Will Smiths Character SO has minor role in the story:

ID4 - viv foxx - big ensemble cast - black woman
Enemy Of The State - wife is minor role - regina king - black woman
Ali - bio pic - it is what is - black women
Pursuit of Happyness - wife has minor role - Thandie Newton - black woman
I Am Legend - wife has minor role - Salli Richardson - black woman
Seven Pounds - wife has minor role - Robinne Lee - black woman

Films where Will Smiths character SO has major role in story:

Wild Wild West - love interest has major role - Salma Hayek - latina
MIB 2 - love interest has major role - Rosario Dawson - latina
Hitch - love interest has major role - Eva Mendes - latina
I Am Legend - possible love interest and ONLY SURVIVING ADULT FEMALE in the film - Alice Braga - latina
Seven Pounds - love interest has major role - Rosario Dawson - latina

Films where Will Smiths character has significant contact with a white women:

I, Robot - white woman with major role - Bridget Moynahan - platonic

Hancock - white woman with major role - Charlize Theron - may as well be platonic

Bad Boys - white woman with major role - Tea Leoni - never realized on screen

Men In Black - white woman with major role - Linda Fiorentino - professional relationship

Focus is the FIRST film where Smith has a romantic white female love interest

A bit of trivia Casting Will Smith’s love interest in “Hitch” was not a simple black or white decision.

Eva Mendes was given the role opposite Smith because the moviemakers were worried about the public’s reaction if the part was given to a white or an African American actress, according to Smith. The actor is saying that it was feared that a black couple would have put off worldwide audiences whereas a white/African American combo would have offended viewers in the U.S.

“There’s sort of an accepted myth that if you have two black actors, a male and a female, in the lead of a romantic comedy, that people around the world don’t want to see it,” Smith told the British paper, the Birmingham Post while promoting the flick overseas. “We spend $50-something million making this movie and the studio would think that was tough on their investment. So the idea of a black actor and a white actress comes up — that’ll work around the world, but it’s a problem in the U.S.”

Eva Mendes — who is of Cuban descent — was seen as a solution because apparently, the black/Latina combination is not considered taboo.

Sony didn’t return calls for comment.

http://www.today.com/id/7019342#.UXWGzaKR9IU

As a woman I'd also point out that women - like black men - have rarely had important historical roles to play. Why? Because women - like black men - have been oppressed for most of history (and still are in many countries today). I can understand feeling bitter about the fact there are so few examples of women in historical films leading independent lives, becoming heroes in their own right - and women are and always have been the majority of the world's population. It's a damn shame we can't politically correct history. But we can't.

women and people of color have played significant roles in american history and world history.. its just that usually the people telling the story or who have the means to broadcast it to the same degree as white men can aren't people of color or women..

reply share

add reply

formatting help