OK, this was not THAT bad
I have been reading posts slamming this documentary, calling him offensive, anti-semitic, another Michael Moore, etc.
First of all, yes, this is not the most masterful documentary either. It IS unfocused and tries to do too much in too little time. Not all the points he bring up link to his thesis. I think each of his locations (U.S., Paris, London, Berlin, Auschwitz, etc) should each have taken at LEAST an hour. This would have been much more intriguing, and affective.
However, I think that people are either not comprehending him or are looking for reasons to get mad when they act so offended by him in this movie. He makes glib remarks, and pushes the envelope, but, at least to me, he never comes off as Anti-Semitic. Really, to me, he is a little harsh on the other side. He pretty heavily critizes your average person who is trying to deal with the reality of the recent catastrophes.
But, again, I understand. His remarks on the tourist aspect of the Holocaust bring up a good point (and would also make a good movie by themselves).
And those saying that he is not being respectful to the dead; I think that selling hot dogs at Auschwitz is disrespectful to the dead. That is what he focuses on in his trip.
I think that he would have been a bit better recieved if he had combined his black humor with some retrospect. Yes, he was horrified at the time, and turned to humor and sarcasm. This is REAL, it is his reaction. But if he would have come up with a more eloquent way to express his feelings later, I think his point would have come across better.
Overall, there were some interesting points brought up in the film (why do we want to know if he is Jewish?), but it really seems more like a beginning to me. His job was too big; you can not try to find all of your cultural identity and history in one hour.