... being capable of firing more than 70 consecutive rounds without requiring a single reloading. Even when taking account of the movie's genre, this is truly outstanding.
Seriously, film makers shouldn't assume their viewers to be even dumber than they are themselves - not that much dumber.
My friend and I watched that scene and counted how many rounds he fired...it's been a while since we watched it, but if I recall, it was about 130 rounds. lol
I know it's obvious, but they just kept looping the same footage of him over and over and over again. Firing at one group, turning and firing at the guy behind the dumpster, then just looping that footage over about 15 times.
Though hard to win an argument with a smart person. It's impossible to win an argument with an idiot
It might have been 130 rounds total, but there were about 70 consecutive rounds ... meaning, in a row!
Thanks for providing to the subject – I know your last line is just a signature (could be mistaken as content text b/c of missing distinction), but it totally matches it ;)
lol yeah, sorry. I tried to put it in italics but I think I'm at the exact character limit for signatures.
"Don't start an argument with a stupid person. They'll bring you down and beat you with experience."
Never mind, it wasn't an issue to me obviously ... but I can imagine you getting in trouble with some people in the past because of that. Funny ^^
share