MovieChat Forums > Mulligans (2009) Discussion > problem with Chase's character - is he 2...

problem with Chase's character - is he 21?


I love Charlie David - I really do. I love Dante's Cove and I thought he was great in Four Letter Word.
However, I think he is really miscast as Chase. First, he's way too old for the role. Is he supposed to be an undergraduate? He's hot as hell but can he pass for 21? no way in hell. He talks about attending college in Four Letter Word but then, it works because you don't assume he's a traditional student.
Then, there is the problem with his best friend not knowing he's gay when he obviously is pretty "out." Chase's best friend seems shocked that he doesn't want to hit it with his girlfriend's pal. If they were mere acquaintances or if Chase was acting straight then, that would be one thing, but...
Then, there is the whole issue of Charlie David being pretty obviously gay. Don't get me wrong that is what I love about him, that he's so open, but when he has that moment where he compares gay to being a spy because nobody knows until you tell them, I laughed out loud. The character doesn't seem very straight to me (the haircut, the eyebrows). When his character wears abecrombie, he does not look like a college aged guy wearing it, but like some 30 year old gay mean wearing it.
The same reasons I love Charlie David as a hot openly gay thirty year old are the same reasons I don't feel he was right for this part.
I mean, was he talking to Thea Gill on the set of Dante's Cove and saying "you could play my mother" (not that she plays his mother per se but it's the same thing).
I'm sorry but he and Thea Gill look exactly the same age!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Charlie David was 27 when the film was made. So was Derek Baynham. So it was not that much of a stretch for them to play 21-ish aged college students. Thea Gill and Dan Payne were both about 37 at the time. So fictionally, about 16 years older than their "son" (Derek Baynham), who in reality was only 10 years younger.

reply

Doesn't matter. They look 30.

reply

I totally agree with the OP. Charlie David was totally miscast (most likely by himself) in this film, and it hurt the film's credibility a lot. From the moment we first see his character, it is absolutely obvious that he is gay. I truly despise the term "straight acting", but he is far from it. I'm not condemning him for being the way he is, I'm just saying he was completely wrong for this role.

However the biggest problem I had with his casting is that he has absolutely no chemistry with Dan Payne's character "Nathan". It just seemed implausible that they would be together (and not least of all because Payne seems almost twice Charlie David's height for a start).

It's obvious he wrote the part for himself, but I would have respected Charlie David more as a writer and as an artist if he'd been more aware of his limitations and not put himself in this film.

reply

Yeah, you could tell he was gay right when you saw him lol. Wasnt very believable.

reply

He looked like he was in his thirties and only a couple years younger than the dad and so very gay acting. The casting was so awful...I'm sure he was only cast because he wrote it.

reply

Of course- that's how it works

reply

[deleted]