It's WAY too stupid and over-the-top to be offensive! It's not realistic AT ALL! It just cannot be taken seriously! Seriously, if this scene offended you, you probably have sensitivity issues and take things way too seriously.
shareI agree with you NoseofNicko
shareI 120% agree, It's obvious they were trying to make a joke out of it. It was a joke in bad taste and the green screen effect was HORRIBLE. but that was not offensive at all. You monsters with wangs hanging out screwing everyone while there is needless nudity and violence amongst the humans. this movie should never be taken serious.
share[deleted]
The idea of someone who can be offended by a film watching Feast II--and making it all the way to the baby scene, at that, strikes me as incredibly absurd, lol.
http://www.rateyourmusic.com/~JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies
If people were offended by this they should see Lars von Trier's Anti-Christ or even Vinyun. Some scenes in those movies would put these people in the ER! Feast 2 was such nonredeemable crap, those other two were actually made with artistic aspirations.
shareAnyone who takes feast seriously is clearly an idiot
shareSorry, I disagree.
And I have seen AntiChrist and Vinyan.
I loved Dead-Alive. I loved Vinyan. I loved Cannibal Holocaust. It (usually) takes a lot to really make me uncomfortable in a film.
But the baby scene flat out disgusted me in this film. It was unnecessary and not funny, and it was a cheap shock joke, completely void of anything relevant to the film. The realistic thud he made when he hit the ground, and the blood spilling onto the sidewalk ... no ... just no.
Even with all the over the top camp in the film, the baby scene was desperate. And anyone who laughed at it is a disgusting person.
Yeah. I said it. You are a DISGUSTING individual if you laughed at that scene.