Whats with Hollywood and killing kids now or days? What ever happened to BASIC decency? Well if your looking for decency it ant in this god forsaken movie. Nor in the first one
message to the cast, crew, writer, director. This is karma. you get all the piracy you deserve....idiots
you do know it's a movie right?
the awful green screen when the baby was flying was a giveaway
don't worry, the baby is fine, he was never even near the monsters (wich were guys in rubber suits), the director wouldn't want his own baby hurt.
Hola Burro!
That was the directors kid?! Sick bastard. I can't believe anyone would think this was funny. The humor fell flat on its face with over the topness (much like that baby). I wanted to turn the movie off much sooner, during the alien autopsy. I've watched some sick stuff in my life (try French horror) but this just didn't illicit one laugh from me. The first Feast movie was waaay better and actually funny.
shareCan someone explain me what's the difference between killing a teenager on a horror movie and gutting her insides out from killing a baby?!?!?
Aren't both human beings, helpless?
it's just wrong, dude. babies are defenseless. nothing bad is supposed to happen to them.
but, it's a grown up thing. we have babies and actually care for them...
Alright, now, wasn't that fun?... let's try something else
[deleted]
[deleted]
seriously. Teenagers aren't defenseless. Many teenagers are straight up @$$holes. And much of the audience for these horror movies are teenagers, and so the filmmakers are just trying to make the characters relatable so their deaths hit you harder. And the adult audience remembers they were @$$holes when they were teenagers too. There is no comparison to killing a baby. It'd idiotic or psychopathic to even suggest that.
But when a baby is brutally killed on screen... it's just there to show the audience that the filmmakers don't draw the line anywhere, and common decency says one probably should. They have a right to do it, but the audience has the right to call them classless scumbags too.
Plus they can't make a decent movie to save their lives. This reminds me of that commercial back in the day for the most offensive movie ever. Most offensive is not something to be proud of. The kind of audience that enjoys that is the kind of audience who enjoys "Ow my Balls!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_4jrMwvZ2A
This is one of the worst movie I have ever seen. Garbage. Not funny and not redeemable. And I sat through the whole thing.
No, no, no Deus_ex-Machina . Until you have a child... Until you have a child...you can't possibly understand.
shareDon't be such a pussy little whiner. Everything has been done in horror movies, we've all seen the teens and their parents ripped to shreds in every way possible. It was time for horror movies to find a new way to shock: hence all the baby/kid death in movies these days.
I for one am glad someone is pushing the genre (splatter comedy) forward enough to include infant deaths. It was so taboo and hush hush to kill a kid in a grisly way, much less a BABY. Now we've moved past that finally. Don't like it? Good, that makes it an even better scene in my eyes. Now go watch a Barney tape or something ya little girl.
Also not sure what the piracy comment was about. ALL movies end up online, what does that have to do with anything? Also these movies came out like a year ago, they're no longer even being 'pirated' if they're available for rent or buy...
No fear. No distractions. The ability to let that which does not matter truly slide.-Tyler Durden
I for one am glad someone is pushing the genre (splatter comedy) forward enough to include infant deaths.I could get angry at you for making such an unbelievably tasteless, moronic comment. But the fact is I might have written the very same thing back when I was 13 years old and reading Fangoria magazine. (Magazines are things us old people used to look at before the internet was invented. You can probably read about Fangoria on Wikipedia.) And I probably would have written it to annoy grown-ups. So instead of getting annoyed at you, I'll tell you something about yourself.
...or I could be an adult about the whole scenario and know the difference between a movie and reality? Sorry if that's too hard for you, but some of us can handle it.
I'm not even gonna respond to the rest of your post, as all you do is assume things about me, then make fun of me for the things you assumed... so who's the real 13 year old in all this?
In-film effects > CGI
...all you do is assume things about me, then make fun of me for the things you assumed...When you write immature, idiotic posts it's fairly safe for me to assume that you're an immature idiot. share
You mean when I write something that is of a differing viewpoint than yours? That's essentially what happened here. I said my opinion on how the scene was great because it's pushing the limits of decency and that's what I look for.
You came back with assumptions and name calling like a child who had his ice cream taken away from him. I think we're done here, as I cannot have a real conversation with you, have a good one...
In-film effects > CGI
You called the original poster a "pussy little whiner" and now you're crying about me calling you immature? That's rich. At least you were right about not being able to have a real conversation. Keep working on your communication skills and maybe someday it will happen for you.
share[deleted]
Grow up dude, If you can't stomach a fictional character getting killed off in a movie then maybe you should stick to "sleepless in seattle" or "when harry met sally" or something like that.
I think this movie was fairly stupid and in no way entertaining but it was refreshing to see a movie were kids don't have this indestructable shield that protects them from everything including movie-nukes and movie-asteroids (even if it was put in specifically to shock people like you and make the rest of us laugh at your prudishness).
I mean seriously, if the plot of Armaggeddon had involved the meteor actually hitting earth we would have seen parentless babies all over the place because Hollywood lack the backbone to kill a fictional character based on it's supposed age. It's not realistic, but it's there to keep ratings from going to high so the movie can make money off the younger audience as well.
Light travels faster than sound,
that's why people seem bright,
until you hear them.
It's a Z grade, el-cheapo exploitation horror film. Why is every one upset. Why are kids sacrosanct? I thought it was quite funny actually.
shareSome day, perhaps years from now, when you are holding your baby in your arms you will remember the comment you wrote here, and you will throw up in your mouth a little bit.
It's possible you will never fall in love, never have children
Congratulations, that post just succeeded in making ME throw up in my mouth a little.Well it's nice to know I'm appreciated. But it's probably not the first time you gagged on some guy's post, right? share
LOL, it is quite amusing reading these posts and watching you argue with everyone that has a different viewpoint/opinion than yourself, you are the one acting very childish.
-maximumxxx
LOL, it is quite amusing reading these posts and watching you argue with everyone that has a different viewpoint/opinion than yourself, you are the one acting very childish.Yes, how childish of me to have an opinion that differs from yours. I must be very childish indeed to agree with the original poster of this thread.
LOL,
Well before you assume I'm a fan-boy or that I thought the scene was funny maybe you should ask, no I don't care for Feast 2 or Feast 3, and no I didn't think the baby scene was all that funny, I'm not here defending the movie, just here pointing out how idiotic some of your posts are and seeing you argue with every other person on this board that doesn't share the same opinion as yourself. Grow up
-maximumxxx
Well before you assume I'm a fan-boy or that I thought the scene was funny maybe you should ask, no I don't care for Feast 2 or Feast 3, and no I didn't think the baby scene was all that funny, I'm not here defending the movie, just here pointing out how idiotic some of your posts are and seeing you argue with every other person on this board that doesn't share the same opinion as yourself.Are you trying to win a prize for the longest and most pointless run-on sentence ever used in an IMDB post? Maybe you should master the basics of punctuation and sentence structure before you call my posts idiotic. At this point your writing is so poor I find it impossible to understand what you're trying to say. You seem to be suggesting that it is idiotic to be arguing on an internet message board, but if that is what you're trying to say then why are you arguing with me on an internet message board? share
Is this what your life centers around? Giving grammar lessons on IMDB, trashing people on IMDB, and trying to make your opinions facts? I'm not at work, if i wnt 2 type wth all my wrds abbreviated thn I sure as hell will, oh and in case you were not bright enough to figure it out, I was shortening those words on purpose. Now, enjoy your life you little troll.
-maximumxxx
Is this what your life centers around?Whoa, projecting much?
[deleted]
[deleted]
vampyrebat666 - You suck at posting.
sharevampyrebat666 - You suck at posting.Fair enough. You suck at everything else. share
Thanks again for proving my point.
You have to be among the worst posters on this site. You've certainly contributed nothing to this thread---nothing that is, except for a bunch of assumptions. You're immature and need to grow up. But until that day happens...
YOU NEED TO STOP POSTING!
YOU NEED TO STOP POSTING!You want some cheese to go with your whine? share
[deleted]
You have no right calling yourself vampyrebat666 and being such a pussy. Please change your name to frillylittlepoodle_wah-wah-wah.Are you going to hold your breath while you wait for me to do that? share
Children die in real life, and in horrible ways. I simply can't understand why that obsession with children having to be safe at the end of the movie. I like when a movie is completely unpredictable, like in "The Blob" remake, which has one of the most unforgettable and shocking child deaths in the history of cinema.
I haven't seen Feast II, but I would have liked more films like Tremors, Jurassic Park (any of the 3), Gremlins, Independence Day, Friday the 13th, etc... had the guts to kill off onscreen some of the kids. The movies that do (both on and offscreen) it are sometimes great or those deaths are memorable... Assault on Precinct 13 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pC6DjBKlSNA), The Blob (remake), Frankenstein (James Whale)... (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-34gLU2vxU), Interview with the Vampire or the extremely hilarious sequence in Zombies of Mass Destruction http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyZK-Zo6Wkc (a couple of seconds after promising the child that everything would be ok and that she would be safe with her)
But at least I can understand people being uncomfortable with a baby or child death, it's even worse that rule that the dog (or pet) has to be saved by any means... poor Tamara in "2012".
(psssssssttttttttttt.....you forgot that the Heroine 2's son got killed in the first Feast)
shareI thought that it went too far with the baby!! WAY TOO FAR. I had already made my mind up that the movie sucked 15 mins into it, but that certainly sealed the deal. I was so dissapointed in this film, i loved the first feast. This was just such a major dissapointment. The characters were all annoying and pointless. That stupid biker chick just went round hitting everyone, again pointless. You couldn't root for any of them. I pretty much just hoped that they'd all die.
shareWhats with Hollywood and killing kids now or days? What ever happened to BASIC decency? Well if your looking for decency it ant in this god forsaken movie. Nor in the first one
im with you it was sick and wrong
shareWow, just where do I begin.
First of all, it is a Horror-Comedy.
Second: the guy who threw the baby was the actual father. Now, apparently those of you who are appalled don't know archetypes of a character. Greg Swank was exactly the type of person to do just that. Now, he didn't give much thought to saving the kid, but throwing it... well, he was saving his own bacon. I'm sure you would run and run and run until eventually those monsters would catch up with you and then, guess what, you would die along with the kid because you didn't throw him. So, double fail to you!
Thirdly: You saw how the first movie was, don't tell me you all are too stupid to figure out that they would do something even worse in the second? The third probably went beyond that, or not as I have not seen it, yet. But I will.
Fourth: How many of you have seen The Last House on the Left? Hrm? I bet you enjoyed it. I really bet you didn't mind when the girl had to watch her friend getting raped. Oh, how long did that scene last? The baby scene could have played 2 or 3 times compared to that scene. I suppose Teen Rape in a movie is much better than a campy fake baby getting eaten.
If you know what sort of movie it is you need to set yourself up for it. If not, then you are just going to be disappointed and come on to the internet where you think your opinion matters - just like me. heh heh
Don't take things too personally, you'll just be disgruntled in the end.
Greg Swank was exactly the type of person to do just that. Now, he didn't give much thought to saving the kid, but throwing it... well, he was saving his own bacon. I'm sure you would run and run and run until eventually those monsters would catch up with you and then, guess what, you would die along with the kid because you didn't throw him.
http://stuffblackpeopledig.wordpress.com/share
You know what! It's just getting boring now reading comments like this. Why do people just start attacking other people on purpose. Jeez it's just so bloody boring. Everyones opinions matter ACTUALLY!!
shareSeriously people, it was just a movie, we all know it didn't really happen! However, as hard as it is to say being a father and all, babies die in real life too, innocent or not. I'm not saying i agree with the director for putting that scene in, or for any child dying in any movie, or in fact real life. Was it in bad taste, sure, but the fact that a movie cannot put in a baby death just because some believe it's wrong is simply ignorant and stupid! In the words of the late great George Carlin, "I believe you can joke about anything, . . . it's what the exaggeration is." the main word here being EXAGGERATION, deal with it people!
shareDon`t be ridiculous, it was pure comedy. Lighten up kid, this PC nonsense does more harm than good.
Eyes pop, skin explodes, everybody dead.
The best scene was when they ate the baby, hilarious.
shareWow I have to see this film...advertising Birth control.
share