Watched Feast 2 last night and OMG, what a complete waste of time. It was awful. It was terrible. It was a prime example of why horror has such a bad reputation. And I bought the damn thing... and part 3 too! Not just a waste of my time but of my money too. Uggg!
shareNo, people like you are why horror has such a bad reputation. You obviously take the genre, and yourself too seriously.
shareNo, he's right. Feast II and Feast III are a prime example of the ADHD minded, stupidly random, trash that gives indie horror a bad name. I'm all for good ol' fashioned fun in horror and I've always believed that comedy and horror goes hand in hand quite often, but these films were just atrocious.
It doesn't help that the filmmakers are a pack of pretentious douchebags who think they've given us the holy grail of genre films with their *beep* little trilogy (actually that's not fair, the first Feast was great).
If you like the films, good on ya I suppose...
You really think the filmmakers behind the Feast trilogy really thought the films were the "holy grail of genre films"? I don't. I think they were given a few bucks by the Weinsteins and had a whole bunch of fun with it, cramming as much into two films as possible. I appreciate a classy, well-done horror flick as much as the next guy, but let's not kid ourselves; these films were meant to be fun. Removing the stick from one's ass might make that a little more clear.
shareTotally agree
This first one was amazing, and the other two are beyon terrible. Seems like a 14 year old boy was given a budget of $500 and told to do whatever the hell he wanted
Such an awful continuation of an amazing first chapter
I agree this movie was really bad, I was disappointed because I found the 1st one interesting.
share[deleted]