MovieChat Forums > Walled In (2009) Discussion > Holes in the plot - who wants to count t...

Holes in the plot - who wants to count them?


Nope, I'm not going to list them, I was wondering if anyone is as mad as Malestrazza (or whoever it was) to count the holes in the plot.

I'll have a guess, Mmmmm about 58.


reply

58? I think you're being nice... lol
What a terrible film! There was nothing in it worth watching.

t'ain't no sin to take off your skin and dance around in your bones

reply

amen to that! this movie was a giant hole in and of itself. I'm sure someone else has mentioned this....but who builds a 100 plus tenant dwelling in the MIDDLE OF NOWHERE!!! The plot is about as plausable as Micha Barton's acting, I want my rental fee and 90 minutes back. That joke of a director should sell his sweater collection and give us all our money back. The best actor in this film is the fire extinguisher.

reply

in the MIDDLE OF NOWHERE!!!


Again soemone who didn't pay attention. Just because YOU didn't get it doesn't mean it is the movie's fault. When Jimmy and Sam were in the empty house he said that there were many houses like that around, but when the factory closed everyone left and most of them were torn down. So obviously this was once a big community. As to why a an accomplished architect would build such a place, they also said that he didn't build for money or fame but only what he wanted to. The movie was as plausable as any other decent film in that genre. And Mischa's acting was very good, something most reviews agree on.

reply

You need to pay attention before you whine .... the movie CLEARLY points out that an earthquake destroyed every building except that one apartment. It was a basic plot point to show that the architect made the building indestructable!

reply

Wasn't that referring to a different building of his in Mexico? I could be disrememberizing.... Either way, the other poster nailed it as far as Jimmy's comment.

reply

This is a good movie, minus the ending. But very few plot holes, yall are complaing just for the sake of complaining by the sounds of it.

reply

The only thing that had me going "what the ...." was the fresh, wet cement pouring into the grave since there would have been no way to keep it like that for all those years (at least no way that I know of). But it was an interesting movie and I loved the architecture.

reply

Has anybody read the french novel Les Emmurés' that this is based on? Is there an English Translation?

reply

Yeah, the fresh cement was laughable. I was rolling my eyes at that one too.

Also, I'm wondering what kind of police they have there that would pin all the murders on the Factory Worker. I mean, the place was BUILT with tombs inside. Who else could have been the murderer except for the architect?



Elle

"If they give you lined paper, write the other way"

reply

What a terrible film! There was nothing in it worth watching.


Oh, I dunno. I thought the building was cool. ;)

reply

Read the book if you think the movie was so crappy lol. The production team ran out of money half way through so they had to wrap it up quickly making the movie not very good.

reply

Do you have the book En Anglais? I have been searching and can only find it in French. I can read french but I'm not gonna pay an inflated price for the French book just to see what they left out of the movie.

Why not enlighten us if you are in the know?

reply

Doesn't there have be a "plot" for there to be plot holes?


Bad films are a crime against humanity.

reply

There were a ton of plot holes in this movie, not to mention cliched' situations and a final that was unfortunately cribbed from hundreds of pyscho-killer movies where the beautiful protagonist is captured as a love slave by the deranged killer.

First off, Demo-chick is very acquainted with the career and legacy of this Malestrazza dude, yet she's never heard of the notorious details behind his last work, all the murders and his disappearance, and has to google them to learn about them while staying there?!

Also, it's her first demolition assignment, and she's given such a huge responsibility of deciding where to lay charges to bring down a building that's already been mentioned as withstanding an earthquake while everything else around was leveled? I don't care if she is just entering the family business, I think she'd be given a task that's a bit more uncomplicated to start with, like, oh maybe a parking garage or a slum tenement. If anything, she wouldn't be solely responsible and doing it all by herself.

And this Malestrazza dude has been kept prisoner by the Mom for 16 years? In his own building? And in that same circular room? Did I mention we're supposed to believe he's been a prisoner for 16 years? If he was held in that same room for all that time, there'd be more than that small mound of food cans piled in the corner laying about, not to mention a huge dung heap somewhre around buzzing with flies because I didn't notice a toilet anywhere down there.

And if this place had really been the infamous site of multiple murders supposedly committed by the world-famous architect Malestrazza, it's notoriety would attract a wee bit of interest by the media in the days leading up to it's demolition, dontcha think? It would never have been so forgotten about and ignored before it's destruction; there would have been newspeople swarming all over it to revisit the horrible details and "pick over the bones" one last lurid time before it's brought down.

I know this sounds like I hated the film, but actually I didn't. If anything it's more a feeling of disappointment that fuels my anger because I loved the set design of the film and the basic set-up of the plot; it's just that by the end of the film too many inconsistentcies and unbelievable actions and motivations of the characters became too hard to accept. I know it was based on a novel, and I have no idea what was either left out or added that may have aided the plausibility of the film, but it's obvious something got "lost in translation" because by the climax this film has overreached itself asked way too much suspension of disbelief from it's audience. Some films can overcome that detriment with a gripping, kick-ass finish that makes you overlook plot-holes prior to that point. Unfortunately, the worst thing about this film is it's silly ending and that just makes every mis-step in the plot leading up to it stand out embarrassingly even more.

Being generous, I give it a 5/10.



"That's a very, very heavy burtation!"

reply

that's already been mentioned as withstanding an earthquake while everything else around was leveled?


I agree with most of your points and yet also liked the movie well enough, but the building that withstood the earthquake was another one by the same architect, located in Mexico City.

Otherwise, you're right that any such building, built by a famous architect and standing alone on the empty prairie, would attract a lot of attention just being there. The murders would greatly magnify the notoriety, and when it was about to be torn down, it would be big news. (And the murders themselves would be hugely famous with international publicity. Even if, by chance, Sam hadn't heard of them, someone in her family would have and wouldn't send her off by herself, at least not without telling her.)

reply

Not much worse than a lot of other horror movies. At least it had a somewhat original idea to begin with.
You need to watch more horror movies if you think this one is so bad.. it wasn't very good but i've seen worse.

reply

I kept thinking: The lights go off every 6 minutes, huh? That should make some suspenseful scenes. Did happen very much, if at all. Also, if I'm by myself in a place that has limited light supply, I would buy a freaking flashlight & batteries at the store! They don't accept checks? Take time to drive an hour away (the nearest hotel was 50 miles away) and find one! Never mind the creepy stories, if you want to do your job right you need the correct equipment.

reply

What made the police stop looking for bodies in the walls? They already found a bunch of them. Why'd they stop looking?

Also, this is NOT how a demolition company goes about bringing down a building.

I'm aware that it's just a movie. There's no need to remind me.

reply