Disappointing rubbish


Personally I think it's rubbish! Please...would anyone really have followed the Messiah as portrayed by Mawle? He is ineffectual at portraying the charisma which is so much a part of any great leader but especially one who led in peace at a time when leaders were characterised by their willingness to make war.

I am disappointed by the inaccuracies wrt the bible...did no one think to actually READ the story before making a film. But then the fact that it was commissioned by HBO should warn the viewer that any attempt at making a realistic ,rigorous piece of work would be second in priority to commercial considerations.

As mentioned in another thread it seems that the cast was hastily assembled from bit part soap actors and those who are more familiar to the public as the face of Yellow Pages and BT Home Hubs.

I think some diligence should be expected and a more serious approach to casting and acting when dealing with the core themes of religious beliefs.

Dare we expect a life of Mohammed (starring Ross Kemp as the eponymous hero)to follow or perhaps the threat of a Fatwah will prevent Mr Offer from approaching that particular religion in such a slipshod manner.

reply

It's not complete rubbish, but I was rather disappointed by the inaccuracies too. There were many parts added that were not from the biblical stories, and many important parts that were completely missed or changed beyond recognition. It made the resurrection seem much more ambiguous and open to interpretation. But I think it could also have been a lot worse.

But yes, not the best interpretation ever...

This is my opinion I can think it if I want. People are not stupid for having a different opinion!

reply

Everyone's entitled to their opinion of this as a drama (I thought it was superb throughout) but I think it's a bit rich to write about its 'inaccuracies' considering all four gospels differ over the details anyway. Why not mix and match, and invent some bits that didn't get remembered and/or written down? If it's going to completely mirror a particular gospel version in every single detail it would be a total bore; I'd think 'might as well just read the book'. And in terms of its period detail I think this version is second to none.

reply

There are four accounts of the Christ in the New Testament and it would be wearisome indeed if a modern screenwriter did not add some credible and accessible plot threads for a 21st century audience. If the characters said 'Yeah verily' it would be hooted offscreen. After a rather slow start with an irritatingly Oirish Pontius,it became a very believable display of power politics sacrificing the innocent, a recognisable,universal theme. Penelope Wilton is never less than superb - even in nobhead stuff like 'Doug Who' - but her (NON-BIBLICAL) cry of 'My beautiful son!' was heart-rending and chilling and the cast was uniformly splendid. Nice to see the lovely and under-used Paloma Baeza in a leading role. The boy Mawle was excellent too - it was not the film's brief to show how, charismatic or not,he assembled his followers - the New Testament never tells us how they survived - only to show the Passion. That was why it was called 'The Passion'.OK?

reply

[deleted]