MovieChat Forums > Bereavement (2010) Discussion > The Movie the Halloween Remake Should Ha...

The Movie the Halloween Remake Should Have Been.


Just got back from the late night showing a little bit ago. The development of the plot with Martin Bristol has similarities to what Rob Zombie was trying to do with the Halloween remake, but in Bereavement it is executed much much better; the entire film builds up to the excellent last act and it was definitely worth it.
The cinematography, as has been reported, is excellent. The theater 's digital projector was a bit dull though, so I can't wait to watch this one on Blu-Ray at home as my tv and PC have settings more in tune with what I like. I actually liked the score to Malevolence better though, but the score was solid and fit the much different feel to Bereavement well (though I'd still prefer the piano and synth score Malevolence had). The sound design didn't really make good enough use of the surround sound system though, but it was more of a plot and tone driven horror-thriller, so though atmospheric sounds would have been nice, that can be forgiven. Bereavement had a pretty different feel to it than Malevolence did, better acting aside, there was more of a somber tone with the creepiness and the structure of the film was quite different. The film can be pretty brutal as well, especially the last act.
I also wanted to mention that the actor that they got to play Martin Bristol as a child looks remarkably similar to the one that played the adolescent version in Malevolence, so there's a smooth transition there in terms of both the look and the acting.
There is a post-credits sequence as well, which ties it in more directly to Malevolence, so you'll want to stay for that.
Unfortunately I was the only one in the theater, but that had its' positives as well, at least in terms of my comfort level. This is an indie horror film without much advertisement, playing a late night show on a somewhat dreary weekday, so that can be forgiven.

Overall I quite liked it, and can't wait to watch it at home. The last act alone was worth the price of admission.

reply

I agree...I was thinking the same thing. I was also thinking this guy really could be the next John Carpenter...he deserves a bigger budget and he deserves some respect. His take on horror is better than higher paid people who crank out crap.

I think perhaps he doesn't want to make it to the big time.....he prefers this maybe.... who knows.

Anyways... I'm hoping for a 3rd movie to finish off the trilogy if he has one in mind.

http://www.youtube.com/user/alphazoom
http://www.vimeo.com/1986276

reply

[deleted]

Well.... you have to be fair to Zombie... the workprint of Halloween was much better than the theaterical cut. Everything was in place for a proper remake and there was really nothing wrong with it aside from the eerie score from John Carpenter/Alan Howarth.

The mistake was recutting the workprint and adding extra deaths that were not there before...the one comes to mind...Danny Trejo's. He always like Michael the entire time he was locked up and treated him fairly and originally did not kill him. The ending was also changed as he got shot by the cops and died. Laurie did not kill Michael.

He ruined part 2 on purpose because he didn't want to make another one. You could tell because it was like a joke on Michael's character to do so many things he would never do.

http://www.youtube.com/user/alphazoom
http://www.vimeo.com/1986276

reply

He didn't ruin anything on purpose you retard. My God people are so *beep* stupid. His *beep* name is on the movie WTF would he wanna make a bad movie on purpose and possibly hurt him for future projects?

Halloween II was the movie Zombie always wanted to make; the reshoots of the remake were due to company and Zombie felt also he had to deliver something along the lines from movies past. With II he had creative control to do what he wanted.

As for the remake why was killing Trejo bad? It was to show Michael has no remorse, no feelings he'll just kill.

Seems like things went over your head.

Darling, you can't rape a townie.

reply

[deleted]

Zombie had no choice because of cry baby fanboys that bitched and bitched about the remake. I love the original Halloween, but way too many so called horror fans are ignorant of the genre and act as if Halloween was the first horror film ever made.

The backstory aspect of Halloween 07 never would have worked as a full movie since the same retarded fanboys would bitch he's not wearing the Iconic mask.
It seems as if people don't realize both films can be liked. It's not one or the other.

What I find funny is all these people bitched over a remake, but fully accepted the sequels, which if not for the original being such a masterpiece would have ruined its legacy.

Darling, you can't rape a townie.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

@ djblack1313 i think this movie was made way back in 2009 without any connection or possibility that TCM 3d was going to be made. She had the lead role in this movie and i guess for a upcoming actress this was a important role nevertheless

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Halloween Remake - well that's the problem as you stated right there.

Halloween and remake should have stayed as mutually exclusive events.

reply