i agree the film was overlong and rambling; unlike 'Grizzly Man', there was no focus, just a tacked on monologue about how there isn't much left to discover, and how the world is coming to an end. 'Grizzly Man' functioned as both an interesting examination of a bizarre life that was doomed to end in tragedy, and as a cautionary tale about nature, and man's--perhaps overly confident--relationship to it.
i also don't believe the glory and majesty, along with the danger, of this 'place' was constrasted anywhere near as effectively as it could have been, and the music was generally overdone, trying too hard to give the impression of a quasi-religious experience.
i also agree the film had at least 2-3 'natural' endings.
good, but it could have been better.
reply
share