MovieChat Forums > The Wackness (2008) Discussion > Ben didn't deserve the Razzie nomination...

Ben didn't deserve the Razzie nomination?


What idiots nominated him? Honestly, there was worse performances that year. He did not deserve that Worst Supporting Actor nod. He was really good!

reply

Yeah, I know ! After watching the movie, I was impressed by how good Ben Kingsley's acting was. I was shocked to find out he was nominated for a razzie.

My Movies - http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=32442779

reply

Mm. There were probably worse performances that year, but that's not really what the Razzies are about, that would be too easy. It's more about what popular actor turned out a particularly cringe worthy performance.

That being said, I think Ben dropped the ball hard on this one, especially if you read the script. I worship his Sexy Beast performance, but his acting in this was terribly uninspired and misdirected, even changing the meaning of the dialogue through horrible delivery. The jail scene comes to mind.

My theory is that Ben has never really been stoned, so he was taking a guess at how a stoned old man would act, combined with having to do an accent specific to a time and region he's not familiar with, and working with a first time director who isn't going to suggest much or demand very many takes from him.

reply

SAY WHUUUUUUT?!
kingsley was hilarious in this, it sounds to me like a lot of the people at the razzie awards have a very condescending attitude, it's almost like "oh you never smoked weed? pfft you need to get out more and live a little"
well screw them, kingsley is a solid actor and this was a quirky, if slightly goofy, roll for him to have some fun with

"is that a chinese baby?"
"sure is, japanese to be specific"

reply

SAY WHUUUUUUT?!
kingsley was hilarious in this, it sounds to me like a lot of the people at the razzie awards have a very condescending attitude, it's almost like "oh you never smoked weed? pfft you need to get out more and live a little"
well screw them, kingsley is a solid actor and this was a quirky, if slightly goofy, roll for him to have some fun with


I agree.

reply

I actually fairly like this movie, despite its flaws, but it is chock-full of anachronisms. Every movie has goofs but this movie was really heavy on the time-period sentimentality, which is why so many of the errors stick out. They were also trying to make Luke seem kind of "stuck in the past" by showing him using his battered old NES during a time when the SNES and Genesis were out, and the Sony Playstation had just come out, for one example. He prefers his old cassette walkman to, say, a CD player, even though he could easily have afforded the newest electronics, considering how much dough he was rolling in selling weed. It's also got its goofy moments (I STILL laugh when he says "word" after climaxing...LOL it's so silly ), but not every movie has to have academy award winning qualities to be entertaining. I'm sure that's stating the obvious.

That said, I will admit I cringed many times over Ben Kingsley's performance in this movie. I mean, we're talking about the guy who played Ghandi, for bleep's sake! I know he's playing a very flaky character, but at times he came off as, well, genuinely flaky (as in Ben being flaky, not his character). Ben Kingsley has always come off, to me, as one of those actors who has the propensity to pull off incredible performances, under the right director. Some actors are just great actors, who can pull off almost the worst roles, even with the rest of the cast falling apart around them, and regardless of the director. While other actors, like Ben, need a good director to really pull the performance out of him. When left up to his own devices, he rather fails. Hard. Like Magnum opus said, he came off as very uninspired and misdirected, and I absolutely agree it was likely the fault of the first-time director, who may have felt a bit intimidated by Ben's reputation (not as a threat, just that he was working with a seasoned pro) and sat back & let Ben do his own thing without stepping up when it was needed. At times I often wondered if he really was smoking weed during his performance, that's how dazed, flat, vapid, tired and uncaring he acted. In this case, he really did deserve the Razzie.

reply

Technically he didn't get it for this film as it was a body of work nomination. The film he really got the nomination for was The Love Guru. They just listed every film he did that year without realising he was actually good in this one.

It's an ordinary high school day. Except that it's not.

reply

I couldn't get past the accent to actually focus on his performance.
What WAS that supposed to be??

You better understand I'm in love with myself Myself My beautiful self

reply

[deleted]

They just nominated him because he was in The Love Guru. Which, whilst it was a terrible movie, he wasn't even that bad in, given the material and writing. The Razzies have this habit of nominating several people for the same award, or several films for one actor. Which doesn't add to their legitimacy a bit.

Kingsley's performance in this was marvellous. He captures that stage in our lives where we realise that it's 'all downhill from here' with unnerving accuracy. Filled with a sense of melancholy as well as injecting his character with humour and pathos, he also brought a world-weariness to the role. He pulled it off with wit and aplomb, despite the inconsistent direction. And I rather liked the slow line readings, it showed that he was very much wandering through life in a haze, desperately clinging onto his youth. Very sad, and very funny. A wonderful performance.

If you ask me, he should have been nominate for an Oscar.

FYC: http://i53.tinypic.com/25kq4gm.gif

reply

Definitely not, I thought SIR Ben was pretty solid. Not his best performance, but still very funny.

"I am not a complete idiot, some parts are missing."

reply