..that's all I want to know?
It has a 7 rating which is good for IMDb and can be dL'ed over the internet as of this morn...so if anyone seen it can u please inform us if it was worthy watching or not? Thank u
Well before i watched it the ratings on here was high, so i went and watched it, while watching i did think to my self why did this get such a high rating when other films i had recently watched which were a heck of allot better than this got lesser ratings, however when i looked again the next day the ratings had dropped to about 3/10 which i would agree with, it wasn't that great a film imo, the acting was poor as was the story line imo however some of the visuals were not bad but i wouldn't go looking to see any more of these films im afraid. I found myself trying to count how many times i heard the word leggat i think it was pronounced, lets just say if there was to be an award for a film over using the same word over and over i think this film would win it hands down for repeating that word so many times its unreal and why would you be thinking of such things while watching a film lol, need i say any more. Kids would maybe like this film but as for adults nah. Maybe he will do better next time :)
shareI'm afraid the award for the film using the same word(s) over and over again has already been claimed by this movie...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATpq5P1tPjY
"Well...I've seen enough. Come on Charlie, we're going home."
The costumes are bad. I mean, nice designs but they needed to be "roughed up" at least a little.
The lighting is horrid. It's like a first year film student wanted to do everything himself.
The acting is on and off. Some of the actors aren't bad while others would be better off flipping burgers.
The environments, much like the costumes, are way too clean.
The post-processing makes the film look like it was shot with a $200 digital camera. Actually, it is a combination of the cameras used, the post-processing, and the lighting.