a few shocking things for a disney movie

so because this is a disney movie, starring disney stars, most notably ashley tisdale, you would figure this film to be quite kid/tween-friendly.
For the most part it is, however i was shocked to hear a few things in the film considering the innocence you would assume.

first of all, a couple of boys were referring to the character of mandie as a 'hump and dump' and a 'hit and run.' also, mentioning her nice 'boobsicles.'

also, when mandie is talking to drew about lisa and her piercing scream, it was obvious drew meant it in a way that did not portray fear, but hinting a reason for his knowledge somewhat sexual.

so next mandie's friends discuss the possibility that drew only likes mandie temporarily, as he is using her to continue a ritual discussed as 'deflower in the shower, in the tower.'

when the girls venture to the mall they have an encounter with a man named bruce working in a furniture shop. once they are done in the store, they run out laughing leaving bruce calling 'hey, whatever you girls are on, can i have some?' i do believe his comment to imply drug use.(although in regards to drug use, we can most likely infer the girls were NOT on anything, it was just the comment that was surprising)

and, a minor detail, yet still shocking: mandie's dad finds his nephew watching some sort of 'girls gone wild' tape in the bedroom.

shut up troll just because you didn't like the movie doesn't mean you should ruin it for people who have not seen this movie girlcanrock117
pg-13 hello!!!

The most logical answer is this probably was NOT intended as a Disney/ABC Family TV movie when it was written, or even being filmed.

Most likely, Ashley read the script... Along with hundreds of others... And decided she liked the part of Mandie (because I believe the character is very similar to Candance on "Phineas & Ferb" which means she really didn't have to stretch her acting chops much). This movie probably was intended to go straight to DVD, but I am pretty sure Disney snatched it up because AT is in it and wanted another title under their belt to promote another one of their "stars" -- Sooner, or later AT is going to break out from under the Disney label and be her own actress... Just like Lindsay Lohan, and Anne Hathaway.

actually, this wasnt a disney movie at all, even though ashley is in it.. everything she does isnt going to be for disney. she can do other stuff.. and as for abc family, it was a straight to dvd movie and they decided to shut it on abc family.. they cut out one part of a scene in the movie that wasnt appropriate to show on tv, but abc family does show things that were a little inappropraite in the movie, for example in the secret life of an american teenager or 7th heaven.. so yeah.. just thought id say

Maybe you should pay a little more attention because it is not a disney movie and it is rated pg-13

Yeah it was slightly shocking I intended to watch this with my niece she is 11 and may not get the jokes and terms.I guess its up to her mother now. There was one more comment that was said at the yogurt shop when the one girl was telling the girl behind the counter how to get Mandie to drink the macadamia nut yogurt smoothie. "I don't care tell her its orgasmic" Also the part when the 3 girls do some sort of ritualistic curse using Marylin Manson's blood. so I think they should have edited this a little more on abc family.

The movie was executively produced by Tisdale's company "Blondie Girl" Films - the movie was produced and distributed by MGM. Just because Tisdale is in it doesn't mean it's Disney.

Do your research before making such a stupid post.

[deleted]

As a not, I thought the screaming was meant as the girl being angry and screaming around him all the time, be it at him, or on her phone to her friends. I think this movie was a very refreshing take on this style. Pushing the envelope and being edgy as opposed to how boring and white-bread safe most of the Family/Disney movies are.

"The day your born, your already dead."