a terrible movie..

In Skyfall's case, you don't accept the tunnel as rebirth, even though it's a common symbol, like e.g. De Palma used in Mission Impossible, M2M, Body Double etc. If you had said you hated the rebirth theme in the tunnel, it would have been ok, but this is just not a trustworthy objection, if you don't accept or understand the theme.

I will write in such a manner that it gives the impression of a very slow pace, and simplistic explanation for your tiny brain.

Hitchcock's Marnie arguably has as much deep symbolism as many of Hitchcock's other far more popular, known and acclaimed film.

yet if i had gone up to any of my film teachers and said "professor, I crunched the numbers, and Marnie has 35 deep symbolic references and themes, pyscho only has 25. THerefore anyone who didnt like marnie more simply doesnt understand "art" and as you said, cant tell the difference between art and mass produced entertainment"

Had I said that, 100% of film proffs would of laughed me out of the room.

what any professor would say, or indeed any 18 year old who has taken a films 101 class knows (which clearly you do not and hence are less educated than 1st year film students. pretty sad eh?)

is that while filmic elements often have symbolic meanings (from a constantly reinforced one like the protaganist being a savior or messiah figure, to a single high angle shot implying vulnerability), they can have merit, beauty and value on their own, both attached to but also standing alone from their symbolic implications

-Actors may give amazing performances, not because their character better symbolized a messiah figure, but because their acting is more believable, immersed, and overall better.

-lighting in some shots may be simply gorgeous, such as in physcho and many tarintino flicks. often it implys something else, but on its own it may be beautiful aestetically

-the editing style may not nessecarily imply symbolism, but may be a throw back or homage, or jsut interesting in general because of how unique it is (Django unchained)

-sets or just frame compositions may be gorgeous lavish sets or perfectly balanced. Grand budapest hotel had some of the most perfectly balanced shots i have ever seen in a film.

-scores can set the mood and tone, but symbolism in musical scores???? by your definition the score has 0 merit and value to the film because it doesn not advance deeper symbolism

-the cinematography and what is filmed can be unbelievably beautiful mountain sides or other sets. Godzilla 2016 for example opened with some of he most beautiful shots I have ever seen... Unfortunately it killed off the interesting character played by bryan cranston and gave us a 2d archetype military guy whose character literally had no traits... he was in the military and had a son and wife... those arent traits. godzilla also had no real traits, he was rarely seen and a monster with 1 narrow goal.

so was godzilla bad because it simply didnt have enough symbolism?? or was it bad because maybe a film is madeup of more than just subtextual things like symbols, and MAYBE other aspects can contribute to make what we consider a good or bad movies, such as how the sets, editing, cinematography, acting, score all interact and effect the audience and our experience

Look, I gave you two good film recommendations. If you actually want to see a real Bond movie, then I've given you the information you need. But if you want to keep living your life thinking that Daniel Craig is a good actor, then I really pity you.