MovieChat Forums > Ink (2020) Discussion > 'Ink' Deconstructed *SPOILERS*

'Ink' Deconstructed *SPOILERS*


First, let me preface this by saying I'm not religious, I'm just deconstructing a movie.
So, the first time I watched this movie, I was blown away. First film I've watched since "2001" that I immediately watched again, and again, and...
I've analyzed literally every second of this film, and let me tell you- this is a film you can analyze every second of. It's a perfect allegory; the filmmakers left very little to theory or debate- once you figure out the main allegory and accept it, every second falls into place and makes perfect sense. I'll share what I've learned- perhaps you guys can help me with the parts I haven't quite gotten.

"Ink" is an allegory for Christianity- specifically a Trinitarian kind (I'm inclined to think Lutheran, given the references within the film). Sorry, don't blame me, I know you guys want this to be "The Matrix" and it's hard to accept that anything this brilliant could have such a "disappointing" message (not my opinion, I grasped it from these boards), but it's true. Once you accept that fact, this film becomes very easy to deconstruct, and everything falls nicely into place. I'll break down the major characters and plot points, and you can see what I mean.

One more thing- you can't look at this film like a normal movie with a plot, story arcs, etc- it's not. It's an allegory, or "running metaphor", and the "plot" as such really comes second to that- it's just a means to delivering a message. With that being said, here's my take:


* "John" is the everyman, a soul searching for God who has gone off track somewhere.
* "Ink" is a representation of sin within the everyman- an "Ink blot" on the soul. He represents the part of John that is lost, confused, angry, violent- he's the result of bad choices, influenced by the "Incubi".
* The "Incubi" are demons. They influence us subconsciously, in our dreams and throughout the day by whispering in our ears, pushing us towards doubt, anger, fear, Sin, and ultimately death.
* The "Storytellers" are angels, influencing us to hope, do the right thing, and believe in God.
* The Head Incubus is Satan.
* The "Pathfinder" is the Holy Spirit. He leads by faith, not by sight. He's separate from the angels, more powerful. He notices the patterns within all life, and is the only one capable of affecting that pattern from the Spiritual world. The music, the beat- put it together. Accept it and you'll see it's undeniable.
* "Liev" is God, most likely the Christ aspect of God, in Angelic form. (Liev is veil backwards, by the way, which is a metaphor for "the veil that was torn" when Christ died, as well as the illusions of Sin being removed by the Truth). This is blatantly stated throughout the film- we see her walking through heaven, always serene, playing with children, we see her meditating in heaven at the same time she's fighting Ink (omnipresence), we see her in communion with the other angels while somewhere else (omniscience). She somehow knows exactly where Ink and Emma are, and is able to find them, while the other angels get owned and left in his dust. She keeps referring to Emma as a lion, as well (Christ is the "Lion of Judah")- this threw me off a bit, making me think perhaps Emma is Christ and Liev is God the Father, but there's not enough evidence to support that. She sacrifices herself for Ink, which results in his "Salvation". The demons are terrified of her. The greedy "in-betweener" calls her "The Big Prize". I could seriously go all day- it's so obvious once you accept it.
* "Emma"'s up for grabs- the only thing I can think of is that she represents innocence.
* Now then, why Trinitarian? First of all, because the Holy Spirit and God(Christ) are represented by separate entities (I'm assuming God the Father doesn't make an appearance per se, but if I missed something, please fill me in). Also, there's a Purgatory, which is a Trinitarian concept. Ink does most of his traveling within this Purgatory. We see souls "in-between" heaven and hell, here- stuck because they haven't been able to let go of something from their lives. "The Collector" represents Greed, obviously ("mine, mine, mine"), and lust towards Liev. "The Bride" represents Vanity, Jealousy, etc. ("How they all love to see me smile). Note that both of these entities are deeply affected by Liev.
Once you've started noticing these things, you'll see little moments you didn't notice before- John is on his knees praying for Emma at the end as the angels battle demons- this moment of prayer is what allows the Holy Spirit to communicate with the other angels and call for help- basically everything culminates to that point, and that little moment of prayer is what turned the tide of the entire event. There are literally hundreds of other little moments throughout the film that support this thesis.
I actually believe there is an even deeper metaphor beneath this- that the plot itself is really just a metaphor and not to be taken literally at all, but I have only my opinions to support that. I think the wife is meant to symbolize God in John's life- he knew love, then fell away into the world of work, drinking, etc, lost love (God), and then had to be completely redeemed through the sacrifice of Christ for his sins. He had temporary love, and was looking to fill the holes with anything else he could find, until he finally accepted the "True" love of God.
I love this movie. I don't care if it's Christian- it's freaking brilliant. "The Matrix" was a straight up Buddhist metaphor, by the way. This is on that same level, maybe better.
Oh and the whole time thing- it's pretty straightforward. Ink was the result of John's suicide in one potential future. It's said over and over that time is different in the spiritual world- for them time isn't a straight line- think of it as God looking down on time and seeing past, present, and future as a whole, instead of moving with it. Once John accepts God and decides to save Emma (in the "present" as John, and the "future" as Ink), suicide is no longer a potential future for him, and so the "Ink" timeline disappears completely (literally- Ink and Emma dissolve from the screen as soon as the decision is made).
Anyway, thanks for reading. Let me know what you think and what I missed!

reply

Kudos...absolutely love the explanation. I agree with almost everything you said. Fantastic movie, and explanation.

reply

I didn't know the Holy Spirit was capable of tripping over branches because he got his count wrong.

I have to disagree with you on the religious thing. My recall is that anytime there's a brilliant fantasy/sci fi movie, parallels are found with it and religion. Neo was called Jesus more times than I can remember, to use your example. But this is all to be expected since all religion derives from mythology and mythology is the very basis of the fantasy genre. Tolkien claimed to have written LOTR because he felt like England didn't have its own mythology and openly admitted that he was influenced by Christianity, Norse mythology and others (like Greek, Persian, Celtic and others) as well as fairy tales.

So the genre has these themes built into the very fabric of its storytelling. Even fantasies that work in the grey area or morality don't completely escape these common factors.

Moreover, anytime you have a good vs evil telling, every creature in the good category can be representatives for god/jesus/mary/holy spirit/angels/heaven and everyone in the bad category can be Satan/demons/fallen angels/lost souls/Hell/ect and anyone in between are those mortals heading in one direction or another.

I find it interesting that you saw so many Christian parallels when I saw many other movies in here. The first time I watched it I kept going "this part reminds me of this movie, this reminds me of that movie" but not at all in a bad way. In fact that only thing in this movie I didn't like were the dream warriors. They were boring, forgettable and had no character worth remembering other than "television actor in a movie, who like to whisper their dramatic dialogue."

BUT!

You make a good case for your argument and am in no way criticizing your view.

reply

I totally agree with you. I thought it was pretty obvious myself, but it seems others don't see it. Liev was called "THE Storyteller" which was a nickname for christ. Then, she sacrifices her life for the salvation of John's soul.

I also felt that the "numbness" the people of the Assembly talked about was "turning away from the Word" or not being able to hear "the Word of God" anymore.

And I'm not a christian either ... I just thought it was pretty obvious what was going on. Not everyone "gets" allegory or metaphor however.

reply

" A day is as a thousand years, a thousand years as a day" pretty Much clinched it for me. From that point on, I saw the Incubi vs Angels battle pretty Much as straight foreward.

While I can see how many wish to see this as " sci-fi/fantasy" that fails, since No science is described.

It might BE fantasy, except the parallels between what the Incubi and angels Most reflects battling for the girl's soul. Something not always seen in "Fantasy" but is In relogious movies.

While the Storyteller's identity, The Pathfinder etc may be debated. I find Only those Unwilling to see religious allegory where it is, will try to minimize the religious nature of this film.

Kind of Like reading "The Screwtape Letters" By C. S. Lewis and trying to say that was also science fiction.

The reasons that this movie has religious undertones are not because " all fantasy derives from myth" as someone talking about Lord of The Rings" implied. Since there is No direct derivation from amy Mythological framework.

This is straight up religious allegory. Like Pilgrim's Progress. Anyone denying it simply wishes to wash any religion from anything outside a church or obviously religious film...

It is a Good Movie, an artistic movie, but a Movie that also has a LOT of religious symbolism.

I feel that such Movies need to be applauded and supported.

reply

"Anyone denying it simply wishes to wash any religion from anything outside a church or obviously religious film... "

Totally disagree with this closed minded view. Ink is a great movie and it is up to many different interpretations. Forcing your interpretation on everyone else and saying everyone who views it differently wants "to wash any religion from anything outside a church or obviously religious film" is completely close minded and wrong of course. But then again some religious people are this close minded, and there is nothing that can be done about that.

reply

Liev is derivative of the Russian Lev = Leo = lion

reply

A nice interpretation. I can wholeheartedly recommend you read The Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell if you're interested in the symbolism and allegory in this movie.

reply

"Ink" is an allegory for Christianity-

Not necessarily. It all depends on how YOU want to interpret it. When John was going to sacrifice her daughter on the altar, I can say, is a metaphor of Judaism from the old testament. Or it could be argue, as I prefer, that this is a non-religious movie. You assume,if I am correct, that John was praying. I never saw it this way. He just had his head down (in a position of relaxation and hope) and holding his daughter's hands. All the characters, throughout the movie, are basically the good or bad choices we have to make in daily life. It's a perfect example of the constant struggle of good vs. evil. And all these choices have causes and effects. As the pathfinder goes, this was just the events that life puts in front of you. You decide how to act or react to them.

reply

I'm not Christian, but I think the message is pretty damn clear here.

I do think there is a tendency among non-Christians to automatically deny/avoid/dislike any and all material associated with the religion, because to be honest, a LOT of it is very aggressive in it's manner and message. Usually, avoiding anything preachy is the right move.

In other words, I think a lot of people will purposefully overlook the obvious derivatives here because they enjoyed the film and find the association unpleasant.

reply