The Point Of This Movie


Apologies if this has already been brought up, but I think that this movie has made a very simple yet powerful point.

The teacher is a French teacher (so picture the US equivalent of an English teacher). At the beginning the students are reading a text and pointing out the words that they don't understand. It is the teacher's job to then familiarize the class with the meaning of those words. But what he fails to point out as he gets too caught up in the proper conjugation of verbs and insistence that his students understand "proper" French is that every single word has a strong, powerful meaning and should not be taken lightly.

Then - he uses a word that he doesn't truly understand (of which the English equivalent is "skank"). It is a brief moment - but look what happens just because he uses that one word. Only due to that one tiny word, the entire landscape of his classroom changes and possibly the lives of some of his students. The kid from Mali may get deported. The girl whose eyelid gets split has a transformation in personality and suddenly feels empowered. His teaching career seems to be put on a downward spiral. These are just a few examples.

I feel that is why they intentionally left many questions unanswered. Will Wei's Mom get deported? Will Carl turn himself around? So many more questions as well. The answers could all hinge on such tiny circumstances as the improper use of a word. We all can affect and change the lives of others and not even realize it - especially teachers.

Of course many other points are made in this movie, but I feel this is the primary theme.

reply

Very good take on the film. thank you.

reply

Very strong and interesting analysis.

reply

[deleted]

dawn at bay. I'm pretty sure that The Class did in fact have a story. Maybe one that didn't appeal to you but you can't fault the fact that it didn't have a story. And I hope you realise that it was originally a book and it wasn't actually shot as a documentary, only shot to look like a documentary.

And you clearly missed the point of the film, if you believe that it isn't trying to say something specific. It is trying to show how countries are becoming invaded by multi cultural races and how the education system fails through to frustration and how one rates success.

Honestly I don't get the point of your post.

reply

dawn at bay, i recommend you contact the director and writer of the movie and see what they have to respond to you when you tell them 'It isn't trying to say something specific'. EVERY writer and director is trying to say something specific no matter how random, strange, different or hard to understand their point may be. my brother directs films and trust me, they know exactly what message they want to make when making a serious movie like this.

i would interpret the specific thing that they were trying to show with this movie was the huge, almost insurmountable, challenges which teachers face today in a multi-cultural classroom environment with modern children who are finding it increasingly hard to stay focused on lessons with mobile phones, ipods, xboxes, nintendo ds, tv, radio, internet chat, facebook, etc all bombarding them in their own time.

in addition i think it's about how this generation who are being given everything (even more so than the last generation) are becoming increasingly difficult to please and motivate because in a sense they already have nearly every thing they want. 8 year olds with mobiles in my school is one good example! parents with whole rooms full of unused toys is another! these spoiled kids are becoming teenagers and young adults now and the problems are a natural consequence. my grandad who was a really respected principal use to say 'once the hello's, please and thank you's disappear the rest will surely follow' - im a teacher for 6 years now and am convinced he was right

reply

This has nothing to do with the multicultural society. Well, the situation of this movie is in a multicultural society, but that isn't the point.

The point is that because of bad politics (I know it is easy to blame it on politics, but in the end, it all leads to that), classes are filled with people with different values (or none at all), not because they belong to a different ethnic group, but because they grow up in poverty, massive (unintegrated?) families and - especially - in ghetto's. This is especially noticeable if compared to other regions in the country, where poor people integrate seamlessly, because they are in a class of people who don't have these issues at home.

This movie shows us that the current educational system (and, perhaps even more important, the teacher's values and zero tolerance policies) is not working any more. The traditional pupil-teacher relationship is put to doubt, the whole idea of a teacher doing whatever he wants, vanishes.

It is obvious that for this "kind" of pupils a more personal, friendly approach is crucial, especially when they're in the first years of school.

Honestly, you can't say Souleyman (not sure about the spelling) deserved to get expelled. You can't say his class reached a higher level after he left. You can't say Souleyman will eventually turn out just fine and end his high school career. And the only reason this happened is because the teachers (and the principal) were forced to exclude him, simply because of these "traditional values" of a system that is not adapted to the current youth.

This is certainly not a case that can be limited to the banlieues in Paris or children of immigrants.

reply

"Honestly, you can't say Souleyman (not sure about the spelling) deserved to get expelled."

I'm not sure how you can say this with any definitiveness. We aren't privy to everything he did, over the whole school year. What we are told is that he's had behavior issues in all of his classes - possibly even worse in classes other than French. It seems that he was expelled more because this was the last straw than specifically for this incident.

As for whether or not expulsion will help him, well, we don't know. It appears that Carl was expelled from his other school, but (aside from the heated exchange in the courtyard) he seems to be doing better at this school.

I think the point of the movie is simply to show inner-city education for what it is - a system that produces extremely uneven results. For Souleymane the system didn't work. But some of the students *do* succeed - one is transferring to the very prestigious Lycée Henri IV. The question the film provokes is, what can be done to produce more successful students like Burak (?) and fewer failures like Souleymane? I don't think there are any clear-cut answers.

reply

I read what you wrote not once, not twice, but THREE times, and I fail to find any clearly and concisely stated point. So, pray tell, what is the point of the film?

And please don't tell me that it is "ever single word has a strong, powerful meaning..." etc. because that means absolutely nothing. It is irrelevant persiflage at best.

So, again, what is the point, according to you?

reply

You mean that "words matter"?

How is that connected to contemporary French society? What is the larger context? I don't get it.

reply

An interesting analysis by the OP. Though personally I feel The Class concerned itself with social issues. Debates about use of language within certain social classes, student's worries of their future, etc. All dealt with intelligently by portraying the dialogue openly.

"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".

reply

How is that connected to contemporary French society? What is the larger context?
M.Marin is teaching classical French to first/second/third generation immigrants, mostly from countries that were Francophone, and there are lots of references to the value of classical French to them. Whether or not they are French, or identify with another country, e.g. the football conversation. Not understanding him and he not understanding them. The film shows the fault line in ethnically diverse societies where the majority culture disenfranchises other cultures. It's not just a story of contemporary French society but contemporary European societies although it's not a coincidence it's set in Paris and there's a discussion about arrondissements.
I give my respect to those who have earned it; to everyone else, I'm civil.

reply

Very nice OP. The importance of language and its as discourse. They didn't get his and he didn't get theirs.

I give my respect to those who have earned it; to everyone else, I'm civil.

reply