was that samuel L jackson?


The narrator in the movie was that samuel L jackson? or was i completely mistaken.

reply

I certainly thought it was him but can't see anything anywhere confirming or denying it.

reply

SLJ's voice is deeper and richer.

The voice-over actor had a more street/gangsta timbre to his voice for the narration, like possibly it could have been Ice-T or a sound-a-like.

Anyhow, Samuel L. Jackson would never be involved in this super low-level crápola, but if he did the producers would have made sure everybody knew about it...even using the voice-over in trailers or his name on the dvd cover or whatever.

But, again why would he even do something like this? For the money? Please! There wasn't enough money involved in this to get him.

As a favor for a friend? Possibly I guess, but unfortunately that was NOT the case here. Actually hearing his voice might have improved it a bit...maybe added a certain authentic (historical?) feeling to it. The narration, as it was, was just another flat joke element added to the rest of the flat jokes. Not bad, but not really adding too much laughter or much else. I guess it was just slightly better than just hearing Will Sasso narrate (which in theory it was supposed to be .

reply

Guess what? It is Samuel L. Jackson. He has been associated with cinematic dreck like this one: remember 'National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon'? He does whatever he feels like doing because he's SLJ, baby! By the way, I give the movie ten freakin' stars for being stupid, sophomoric, homophobic, ridiculous, inane, outrageous, and downright fun! It doesn't pretend to be anything other than the stinkbomb it is and it's on in the background right now. A cinematic masterpiece of utter crap!

reply

It was Ludacris

reply

i also thought it was ludacris

reply

i don't know but one thing I do know is that Rip Torn's character had the perfect name for his comeback. King Looney is just so appropriate. lol

reply