Correct me if I'm wrong, but the impression that I got was that the pictures of mutillated fetuses came from the dumpster divers. Is that right? If so, how do we know that they weren't tampered with? Clearly these people are willing to go to whatever length they deem necessary to get their point across - is it really a stretch to think that they might make them look worse to make a greater impact with their 20 foot tall posters?
shareI could say the exact same thing about the pictures pro-choicers bring out of mutilated women who underwent back-alley abortions.
Really, human nature being what it is, I think both sides do some tampering.
I really don't understand the mentality of anyone who is against 'choice',like your personal liberties haven't been taken away enough by idiot Fundamentalist w4nkers.....jeez
"God put you here to test my faith,dude"-BILL HICKS
If men were the ones that had to carry the babies, not ONLY would abortion be legal, but you'd be able to get a tax write off on it.
The abortion issue isn't about "dead babies" and it never was. It's about control. If someone invented a pill that a man could take that would prevent him from getting a woman pregnant for a certain amount of time and the law was HE HAD TO TAKE IT unless he was married, he wouldn't take it. Even if he never wanted to have children. Because no one's going to tell a man what he can and can't do with his body.
http://stuffblackpeopledig.wordpress.com/share
op,
you are correct.
they have been using the same pix since forever, taken from that dumpster dive.
i love the way lil miss feels the need to bury these precious corpses due to the sanctity of human life, but first has to divide up all the bits and pieces and photograph them, i guess there's no conflict there. all those pieces, arms, legs, etc... she had to decide which made which baby, they had all just been tossed together, they were not all clearly ziploced and labeled with dates of conception. so yes highly suspicious and not scientific. and if you know anything about computer manipulation you can plainly see that, too.
even the original (from their giant display), the baby in the womb with the thunb in mouth that they like to compare to, is backlit and digitally enhanced.
that's fine, if someone has reason to believe life starts at a certain age they should just stick with the facts of their argument. those pictures are junk science.
I agree with you completely!
I also want to say I would never have had my rapists baby! But, they give the morning after pill at the rape crisis center so that helps.
They only explicitly linked one picture between the dumpster divers and the posters, but then again there really were only a few pictures total repeated over and over.
The splat pictures were obviously at least partially artisticly rendered, but it's not even relevent. A human corpse of any size is pretty disgusting looking to most people at any stage, and it's safe to say bodies found in dumpsters have been decomposing for a bit.
It's an interesting tactic. I'll need to set up some anti-war "Face the Truth" signs showing the mutilated bodies of civilians we have killed in our pro-life supported war campaign.
Surely the pro-lifers would say "Yes yes but clearly you are overlooking..." at which point I'll cut them off and say "Yes, yes indeed... but ignorance is not just bliss here in america, it's power; you need go no further and nor do I".