MovieChat Forums > Pretty Bird (2008) Discussion > Disappointing **SPOILERS**

Disappointing **SPOILERS**


The ending left a bad taste in my mouth mainly because I have trouble understanding Curtis. Could someone REALLY be that much of a bastard? I guess the devil really does smile while he simultaneously screws you in the ass.

I guess my real question is...

Why didn't someone kill him?

Does the film's integrity lie in the fact that NOTHING is resolved? Is that really what it boils down to? I guess I'm selfish and dumb for wanting just a sharp glimmer of resolution... But, damn, why couldn't they? It's like they ran out of money, got lazy, or just... I don't know. The film was good, but it completely left its audience hanging. I'm sure that I can't be the only one feeling this way.

I also see no reason why Rick could not have just built another rocket belt. That is, if the blueprints really came from the public library... Right?

reply

I agree with you. I liked the movie up until the credits started rolling. I enjoyed the dry humor and the characters that carried the movie for about an hour. I even liked the conflict that developed and how it turned more dramatic later. The main character was pretty sympathetic and comandable throughout despite taking advantage of people all the way until the end. I kind had to cheer of him a little and his drive for success despite clearly not having what it takes. That scene toward the end when he was doing one of his last presenations and they asked about what the market share is, the market share is...awesome...and then break into a scene from Dead Poets Society. That was brilliant.

You gotta feel bad for the guy and admire his will to make something of himself. But i dont get what was going through his head at the end of the movie. Why go out completely on your own? I guess the ending meant that he was a stubborn failure since he didn't achieve anything with that belt and noone ever saw it again. But was the belt worthless to begin with and he was fighting an impossible battle he could never win? They made it seem that way to me but then why did Paul Giamantis character want that belt so bad. It had to be worth something. I understand the selfishness, i just dont understand why the main guy choose that over at least a shot at success. He asked for the help to start with, and he was looking for more help (investors) as the story went on, so i dont get his motivation to cut everyone out for what seemed like no good reason.

reply

Sometimes these little conflicts happen in life and there's no real resolution -- not saying all movies should mirror this (because that would be boring as hell, right?) but IMO it's not so bad every once in a while for a movie to take this course of action.

reply

OK resoultion was not reached, some degree of this would have lead to a more satisfying ending. However it was still a good film, and in life total resolution is never reached.

reply

To answer the question: Why couldn't Rick have just built another rocket belt?...

He probably didn't have the money/resources or he assumed Curtis was right that he couldn't sell it on his own anyway, so he was counting on suing him.

And to address the question: "Why didn't someone kill him?"...
Yikes! I hope that's not how you resolve conflicts :). I know what you mean though. Maybe because only he knew where the belt was or maybe, again, because they wanted to sue him or use him somehow to get something in return. But, hey, maybe they did kill him--we don't know what happened after the last scene, right!

I was also disappointed by the way the movie was ended--I didn't need for everything to be resolved, but I also felt like we were left hanging for no apparent, artistic reason.

reply

Only just saw this today and the ending was indeed, massively disappointing.

As for what was said above about killing him - why not? When he jumps over board they pulled guns out, so they were prepared to put a bullet in him, so why not torture him? Why not put a gun to his head and see if he talked, seeing as they were seemingly ready to go that extra step when he jumped off the boat.

Or why not initially hire a professional to follow him? Too many silly inconsistencies at the end there. And I refuse to believe that any man, not matter how loyal, would stick by a so called friend when they go and ruin their whole life and not want to help someone bring them to justice in any way.

As usual with Paul Giamatti movies, it is worth watching for his performance, but not for the story itself.

reply