I was expecting it to be a brilliant fun filled film, but I barely got those. Sure there were a few good parts, but the movie as awhole grew to be quite boring lacking something. I can't put my finger on it. It had potential. Pattinson's performance was pretty good though. I'm just stating my opinion.
shareI do know what you mean, in a way I think the improv seemed to stifle the flow of certain scenes and I found that a lot of the dialogue was mumbled and I had to rewind to hear what was said. It did lack something but then that might have been the point as the main character is a passive depressive then it would make sense for the story to seem slightly lethargic and dull. I enjoyed it but it's not a film I'll be able to watch over and over despite having Rob Pattinson in it as it only evokes feelings of not belonging and bewilderment.
But I did like the script and thought some of the lines were very funny especially when Art says about his bed: "That's exactly where my bed was as well except it was over there."
Air in the hands Motherstickers this is a *beep* up!
I agree; Boring, boring, boring.
Tried to stand to the end, but gave up after 50 minutes. Gave it a 4...
Yeah I thought I would be the only one. I honestly think some who adore this film are only saying it because of Rob. Had Rob's character been portrayed by a different actor, I doubt some of the fangirls would be over it.
shareWell, that's definitely not true for me. I found his friends more hilarious and engaging than he was, not that it was Rob's acting that was bad, but just because of his character and how it was written.
share