If you had to circumsize your daughter

and I'm fine with my mutilated vulva, does that mean it's right to mutilate babies? no.

You shouldn't be mate, my father has been circumcised fairly late in his life and he told me that since the procedure his sex life sucks big time. Basically during the OP the most sensitive part of his penis has been removed plus the whole "mechanics" of a sexual intercourse changes, making the whole act less pleasurable than it used to be.

Not quite true. I was circumcised as an infant in the US, and I have always hated it. Many other men do too, in fact there is a strong and growing movement against the practice for this reason.

Surveys have found that about a third of men circumcised as infants in the US wish it had not been done. There is also an international support group with chapters across the world for them. www.NORM.org

to those who claim female cutting is totally different because it's worse, or meant to control women: not always true. there are various forms of it practiced in different cultures, some remove the clitoris, some remove labia, some sew together labia, and some remove only the clitoral hood, which by the way, is the same body part as the male's foreskin; they develop from the same tissue in the womb, and are in fact the same tissue type. one covers the glans penis, the other covers the glans clitoris.

so removal of the clitoral hood (the prepuce) is the most exact equivalent of male circumcision. Yet today, removal of the girl's prepuce is illegal unless she is a consenting adult, while in America and Muslim nations, a man's prepuce is commonly cut off when he is an infant, without necessity, never giving him a chance to say no.

there are various justifications given by supporters of both male and female cutting, that are often the same; it's easier to clean, smells better, it's considered more attractive or normal in that culture, they might get made fun of by other kids if it isn't done, it's only a little bit, etc.

pOint is, no one has any right to cut off someone else's body parts without his or her consent, unless in the rare case of necessity (a rotten tooth, appendicitis, fixing a birth defect, etc.)

Buffy>Angel>j00

Well if you actually looked up information on castration, you would no, but i'm not gonna waste my time with you, because in america you're allowed to be stupid. The foreskin scientifically is the same as the clitoris, they both have nerves that effect human sexuality. Many men in america complain about problems because of their circumcision at birth. Women and men in america think its funny to castrate a man.

So- you think ignorance is bliss? Then you must be the most blissful person in your country! oceena your proof that ignorance is bliss.
The absurdity is laughable. Yes you are very laughable .
Answer this- how can these men who were mutilated and castrated be forced into prostitution when they no longer are capable of having an erection? Oh yeah, what 'other countries' is this taking place? Ever heard of sodomy," no I did not think you did. Oh yeah, look up castration on wikipedia, then you'll know what country.