Who believes in the conspiracy?


I just spent 50 minutes arguing with my sister about the conspiracy being true or un true, I believe it but she doesn't. She has more reason to believe in the Kennedy assination, and the Martin Luther King Jr assination. But she feels there is no possible reason that Diana was targeted by anyone, only that her reputation would have been tarnished so that Charles would get custudy of the boys, I believe that too but I just have a feeling that the Royal family didn't like the way Diana made herself so well loved and the royal family looked well, not like her.

Anyways, I believe it, there is a possible chance that she was eliminated because of who she was.

reply

I agree. It's a weird situation. I definately don't think her death was a complete accident. What did that mean at the end, the thing about the trial (or whatever it is, I'm not sure exactly) this October?

reply

I honestly don't know. But if it's true that a cop and one of the few guys that managed to get any good photographs of the accident died...that seems a bit odd. And there's that thought that some guy in Paris drank too much, sat in his car and successfully killed himself via carbon monoxide poisoning and his blood tests would be similar to that of the car driver...if that's true that also seems odd. I know the city is huge but it seems weird that some other male would die by means that would indicate such results from his blood tests that happen to be the same as a man who had very little indication he was under the influence of alcohol, not to mention the whole carbon monoxide thing.
You can't take circumstancial evidence into a court, but often a lot of circumstancial evidence is how the cops know when they might be on the right track in a case. So, if some of what this movie claims is true, that seems to be quite of bit of circumstancial evidence.
Although I must ask...why would the CIA want her dead? That made absolutely no sense to me, and made me question whether or not the author who wrote the book was pulling everything out of thin air.
It reminds me of the movie JFK, which can get you all hot and bothered and thinking the entire thing was some huge conspiracy, but if you see the official report issued after he died you start to think otherwise.

reply

I do believe there was a conspiracy - I just don't think she was the target. I think Dodi was the target. I think doing it while he was with the Princess was done on purpose to make the world fixate on what happened to her and why anyone would want her dead - It seems (from other shows) that she tipped off the press frequently - the frenzy around her wasn't something that Dodi's crew was used to - Dodi probably thought it was his team tipping off the press so he kept plans secret from them - if someone did want him dead - this was the perfect opportunity, and she was the perfect diversion/distraction. JMO

reply

Three countries make a huge profit from land mines every year. England, France, and the U.S. Diana's anti-landmine stuff might have ticked off an awful lot of people in high places

reply

I too believe that something other than a "crash" took place. The whole way she died was just too neat for me -- way too neat. Something here doesn't sit well with me, especially after viewing Diana's interview and hearing her say that she had become a liability and a problem.

reply

I can see why people think there would be a conspiracy, but I don't think there was. The sad fact is that if Diana had been wearing a seatbelt, she would have been fine. Plus there's the fact that, for the most part, she courted the paparazzi. I think that most people just want there to be a conspiracy because of who she was - no one wants to think that she could have died from something as silly as a car crash and not buckling up. We want it to be something more, something where there was no possible way for her to be okay.

reply

[deleted]

Its very obvious that the Royal family has alot of power. The CIA, MI6, and the SIS all have the power to orchastrate anything, and also do anything to cover it up. Diana had alot of trash on Prince Charles, mostly about his affair with Camilla Parker-Bowles. Prince Charles was never happy with Diana, and always want to be with Camilla. According to the "rules" of becoming king, the person the future king marries is suppose to be of a pure somewhat "important" repectful family. Which Diana was. Its just like Queen Elizabeth II's father King George VI, only became king after his older brother Edward abdicated the throne, to marry Wallis Simpson...an American who had been divorced twice. After Diana and Charles divorced, there was a small controversy about the British people not wanting Charles to become king, because of his affair and divorce. (Yes Diana had an affair also, only after knowing of Charles', but keep in mind she wasn't next in line to the throne..) In this situation now, the only way Charles could marry Camilla and still become king, was if Diana had died and left Charles a widower. The NUMBER 1 reason she may have been killed. And of course Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip want Charles to become king, but they also know that he wanted to marry Camilla. The next reason could be the fact the Queen and Prince Phillip did not believe that Prince William, who is second in-line to being king, should have a step-father/step-brother or sister who was Muslim. The 3rd reason why the French British AND American government or Secret services could have wanted her dead was because her Anti-landmind campaign. This could have resulted in what they saw as lower security and protection for thier countries, and also the loss of HUGE amounts of money that went towards manufacturing these landmines. There could be many more reasons. The day of her death, security cameras outside the Ritz Hotel in Paris, was about to capture the faces of multiple French, British, and American Secret Service agents. They were just out in the crowds of people, simply observing. Yes it could have simply been for her protection, but it could have been more. Henri Paul was supposedly associated with MI6. He had plans for a vacation the time Diana was in Paris. He quickly canceled his plans to stay in Paris. Being the driver of the car, he could very much have been part of the assasination plan. A plan that was made before for some guy back in 1992 that MI6 wanted dead. (Cant remember his name and if it was ever carried out....) but the plan for the assination was the use of a "bright flash or light" to blind the driver to make him crash. Which was exactly what happened in Diana's crash. Also if the paparazzi were the ones involved, how do we know exactly WHO those paparazzi were and what if they were actually with MI6? The white Fiat Uno supposedly was never found after the French authorites searched everywhere. Im mean honestly, the French and any other power authorities COULD eventually find something like that. Either they are covering it up, or just didn't actually look for it. Then, there were a few people outside the tunnel who saw the 2 cars go into the tunnel then heard a crash. they didn't know it was princess diana's car. but the first one to run in to see what happened claimed he saw a person running from diana's car. obviously it wasn't one of the passengers. So who was it? this could have easily been someone involved with the plot, who could have easily injected the driver with the amounts of alcohol supposedly in his system. (since no bar records or anything showed Henri Paul drinking alcohol, and also the bodyguards would not have allowed him to drive if they thought he was intoxicated.) The weird thing is, this person who claimed to see someone running from Diana's car, gave his story, but then not too long after the man was no where to be found. Could the French or British intelligence shut the man up? trying to cover up something? The next weird thing: after the crash, after the bodies and Diana was taken from the scene, immediately after the car was removed, the crash site in the tunnel was "scrubbed clean with detergent" by french officals. Now WHY IN THE HELL after a car crash involving someone of such importance, be SCRUBBED CLEAN before any other investigations could occur???? When the ambulance got to the scene Diana was not immidiately taken to the hospital. Then....there was a hospital 4 miles from the wreck, where Diana could have been taken to, but instead was taken more than halfway across town to another hospital. Also there was report that the ambulance stopped a few times along the route, and an ambulance worker was caught on photograph standing outside the abmulance reportedly looking to be having a casual non alarming phone call. No one in the ambulance seemed in any hurry. The next thing was Diana was suspected to be pregnant. Her body was only PARTIALLY embalmed. Why? Perhaps the medical examiner was instructed by a higher power to "cover up" any signs of her pregnancy. Also why would someone be embalmed at the hospital so soon after her death? AND ONLY PARTIALLY? Its obviously someone ordered her dead. and the person or persons who did, had enough power to have it done, and have it covered up. The French and British government has the power to cover up ANYTHING they wish. Someone could have shot the princess straight up in a public place seen by many people. But if the govenment wanted it to look like an accident or whatever, they can do ANYTHING they want to cover up the truth. People who know what they saw, could easily be "silenced" by the government. the said thing is, baiscally she was killed to protect the reputation of the Royal family, and unless someone involved decides to come clean, we may never learn the truth behind her death. Its obvious it WAS NOT an accident.

reply

Thank you! God Bless you, I am glad to read so many comments that show everyone knows she was murdered, I just wanna know if it was the Queen or Charles and why?

She was truly a princess to the people, her life is the greatest story in the world. I never saw the movie The Queen because I hold so much anger toward the Queen.

reply

I beleive too that she was killed and that it wasn't an accident she even states herself that she wouldn't go away and that was bad for the Royal Family.

Here you have this woman that is loved by everyone, she was at the time one of the most, if not the most, important people in the world. She speaks openly about her feelings, the trouble she's had such as depression, bulimia, cutting herself, she's extremely affectionate and is not afraid to be seen showing emotion. She's absoultely gorgeous (can't say that about any of the Royal Family) which of course raises her profile because not only is she this stunning, well poised creature she also a humanitarian.

Then you have the Royal Family who does not come off as endearing, caring, etc. (I live in the US so maybe we don't get to see that side). Of course she was loved more because of this and the fact that she wouldn't go away after her divorce did not help. Charles' camp tries to paint her as this crazy person which only hurts them because Diana comes out and states the truth. In turn giving her more praise. If she were in fact still alive today I think she would still be overshadowing the monarchy. Which is something they did not like.

I do love how it all kind of backfired though. She is still talked about today, she is still 100 times more popular then any of the royal family. When Charles married Camilla there was public outcry which probably pissed the monarchy off yet again. Everyone still praises her. Even after her death the monarchy was attacked yet again for the way they acted towards her death.

You can't come in here, this is my masturbatorium!


reply

Everything that you have just said is exactly what I have been saying, there are just too many reasons why she must have been set up. I saw her interview on Lifetime last night, as I sat there and looked at her, I was thinking; 'who ever took you from us, will pay in their death which I pray for. We love you Diana, you were more worthy of a crown then any member of the monarchy'

Diana aka the People's Princess.

reply

Out of the many ways to kill someone isn't a car accident the best. You couldn't poison her or cause her to have a heartattack. A plane crash would have caused too much investigation you not only deal with the British government because of who she was but you also have to deal with whatever airline agency and also the host country. I know in America there's a lot of red tape when a plane goes down and not only that but you could also injure many others depending on where the plane actually goes down.

A car accident on a stretch of motorway where the cameras are turned off (no others were) and in Paris and there aren't any other cars on the road? They're in a tunnel where the lights are off? And frankly I don't think it mattered that they killed two other people. If they really wanted her gone they wouldn't have thought twice about killing two others. Look at other operations that have gone down. Isn't that how governments work, get the job done?



You can't come in here, this is my masturbatorium!


reply

I don't espouse anything passionately in this whole thing -- I don't know if it was simply an accident or there was something fishy. I'm on the fence. I think anything is possible, even that it was truly just a sad accident.

But....having said that, I wouldn't put anything past the Royal Family and the dark side of the British equivalent of the CIA, MI6/British secret service.

It's very strange that Henri Paul had been receiving hefty sums of money from a source now untraceable, in the months leading up to the tragedy.

Diana had become a thorn in the side of the "establishment" for several reasons. It's all too convenient that she wound up prematurely deceased. That's all.

For silky-smooth legs, I use Occam's Razor!

reply

Even though I do think the conspiracy is highly likely, I doubt the Royal Family kjnew about it. Let's face it, they were in a PR battle with Diana... she always came off as kind and caring---they came out as pompous and strange. Her death would not be of much benefit to them. They were trying to paint her out to be some nutjob... now, it may seem easier to do that with someone who's dead rather than alive. But, not really. Now, that she's dead, anyone who says anything even remotely critical of her comes off as a horrible waste of human flesh... like Joan Rivers. So, her death didn't help the Royals in any way. In fact, it hurt them more than anything a living Princess Di could do

reply

Perhaps they didn't envision that, though. I'm not saying the family had to have known/ordered her death, I agree with you that perhaps they did not, but I can see how theoretically, they could approve or be the ones who wanted it arranged while not having the foresight to see that removing her from the planet would cause more of the same, not less.

Sometimes people or groups do act with laughably little foresight on how their action may escalate what they see as the problem, not remove it.



For silky-smooth legs, I use Occam's Razor!

reply

I just think if she was murdered, it had more to do with her anti-landmine crusade than anything else. And, I'd be shocked to learfn the Queen knew anything really about landmines. The Royals today are basically elevated super models (minus the looks) in my eyes.

reply

Could well be the landmine issue that some entity of people wanted her bumped off for, yes.

I don't really know enough about the landmine situation, and how many groups, governments or entities have reason to defend the continuing use of them, to speak on the issue, but it's something to consider when pondering the conspiracy theory of it all.



For silky-smooth legs, I use Occam's Razor!

reply

I don't think there was any conspiracy.I just think she was in a car accident.People are in them everyday and people die from them everyday.I just think when people look at something hard enough they can find many things that look 'fishy'. I also believe that people get this idea of celebrities being invincible or above life.

reply

Hey, I'm not one of those people.
I already said in my initial post, I don't know what I think EITHER way.

I think either is possible -- this is not Jane Doe down the street who got killed in a car accident. This is someone who was a key figure creating waves and angering powerful entities.

Having said that, sure, could have been an accident too. But I think the people who are completely and obsessively married to EITHER the conspiracy theories OR the "Just an accident" theories BOTH have their heads in the sand to certain extents.




For silky-smooth legs, I use Occam's Razor!

reply

There is absolutely NO WAY that Diana could have had custody of princes in the line of succession to the throne. Just no way.

It is true that having her marry or have babies with a Muslim Egyptian commoner might have been blisteringly embarassing—these would, of course, have been half-siblings of a future King.

But a conspiracy to murder her, if it had ever come out, would have brought down the British monarchy altogether.

I don't believe in it for a second. Too risky.







If the Kingdom of Heaven is like a grain of mustard, It can also be like a chicken-pox mark.

reply

There are much easier ways to kill a person than staging a car accident. They killed two people and seriously wounded a third to get to her? And the fact that there could have been other people on the road that could have been killed. It's all to risky. There are much easier ways to kill a person without involving other innocent people.

reply

Who would have wanted to kill her? I cannot think of the royal family. I mean, she had been a princess and was the mother of the queen's grandsons. That looks so senseless to me. Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth are also people, they might have hated her more than anyone else (which i don't think so, at least not for Prince Charles), but not to kill her.

reply

What I believe is this; was Diana murdered? Yes, without a doubt. Could it have been set up by the Queen and Prince Charles? I pray that they are not. Maybe it was the people who wanted to keep the bombs in those fields and no care for the children that get hurt by them. There are a lot of great legends who have died and their death looked to be like they were set up to be murdered, Diana was one of those unfortunate victims. I pray that those who have killed her face their judgement sooner and the damn better.

reply

"Maybe it was the people who wanted to keep the bombs in those fields"

Yes, it was those multinational "KEEP THE BOMBS IN THE FIELDS" corporations who killed her. There's a FORTUNE in keeping unexploded bombs underground. I personally suspect the "Leave 'em Alone Company" based in Trenton, NJ. I hear they get $1000 for each limb a child loses, with a $500 bonus for every testicle blown into orbit.

reply

[deleted]

Exactly why Diana died, bastards! All of them.

reply

They didn't want the future king of England to have a Muslim half brother.

reply

I question ANY public expiration of a well known person.

Gaymer proudly zapping zombies on Xbox Live.

reply