MovieChat Forums > Clapham Junction (2007) Discussion > An Accurate representation of gay life i...

An Accurate representation of gay life in 2007? Don't make me laugh.


What a joke, it was nothing but an endless parade of age old cliches.
I had been looking forward to this as it had been hailed as the centerpiece of Channel 4's autumn schedule but it was downright embarrassing.



I love you in a way that is mystical and eternal and illegal in 20 states

reply

[deleted]

I don't know whether i agree. i know a lot of friends who are typical of these characters. Not all of us gays are nice people. Like heterosexuals we have our good and our bad

reply

I dunno, I live in Sydney and it's impossible task to not be surrounded by the age old cliches if you're even remotely involved with club scene. It might just be a case of where you live and where the writer/s of this film live.

reply

I think you are confusing conformity with acceptance...I readily identified with Rupert Graves' character.

One thing I think it was spot on with was in regards to there still being a lot of homophobic a-holes out there (and the odd self-loathing homophobe inside the gay community) that intend harm to gays for no other reason than because we have sex differently from the majority.

reply

I just finished watching it and, while it was well-acted across the board, I must that it fails to show a single emotionally well-adjusted gay character, which for a 2007 production is a real failing of the film. The closest we get is Gavin, of whom we see and know almost nothing. Even Rupert Graves's Robin is lonely and frustrated, still hanging around cruising areas.

reply

Theo was well adjusted.

reply

Personally I'm tired of the complaining prudes who want every gay themed movie to be like a documentary.

It's a movie and not the first one to show negative sides of all the main characters. Plenty of hetero films out there where it's mostly about sex, drugs and violence.

reply

Well said, IceGuy.

To the OP, I don't think anyone claimed it was an accurate representation of *all* gay life. How can a movie be that? It was about specific characters, and the behaviour and attitudes specific to them. I saw nothing in it that suggested it was trying to be some sociological overview.


You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

reply