OK, which sucked more - this movie or Tekken?

both are as bad as each other

Although Tekken was far from good, I gotta say King Of Fighters sucked much more.

Tekken was as if someone took a crap and called it a movie. King Of Fighters was as if someone took a crap on top of that crap and then called it a movie.

KoF definitely has less going for it. Horrible casting, unfocused script, and absurd creative liberties (Terry as a CIA agent?) sunk this turd lower than any Uwe Boll film. Both movies may have been a shameless cash grabs, but at least Tekken showed enough respect for the source material to sufficiently reflect it.

This movie made no attempt to convince me it wasn't a piece of crap.

KOF

KoF sucked more.

I'm a bit ashamed to say so, but I kind of enjoyed myself while watching Tekken. Maybe the video-game movie streak of ultra crap just makes me set my expectations really low, but the company of so many familiar characters that actually seemed somewhat like they are in the games was enough to keep me satisfied.. so I kinda found it okay-ish.

On the other hand this was far from okay. In all regards this movie sucked ass. The first hour was pure redundant, irrelevant boredom, while the last half hour also had a bit rubbish fighting between characters I was completely indifferent towards. And what was up with Kyo being clearly Asian as a kid and clearly white as adult?? FFS.. they weren't even trying to make sense! Ohh dear.. the clichés, the inconsistencies, the silliness.. the HORROR!

In short: King of fighters was magnitudes worse than Tekken.

at least tekken had better fighting scenes

kof repeats the CGI effects twice everytime a CGI effect is used!
how amateurish can a movie get!?

I watched Tekken three times in the cinema. I almost walked out three times on KoF it was THAT BAD.