Seriously 2012?


What it's going to take like 5 years to make it? thats quite strange. Why 5 years?

reply

Plot Outline:
This film charts the relationship between a man imprisoned for drug smuggling and his wife and is being shot over the course of five years, a few weeks at a time.

reply

Wouldn't it have been cheaper, quicker and easier to use make up, or any other technique, to make them look older, and to use a different child to make it look like he had grown?

"Dont let it end like this... tell them I said something."

reply

It's a Winterbottom film. The conceit and the process is more important than cheap, quick, or easy.

reply

Yeah I agree that cheap, quick and easy would not look good but as long as five years? It just doesn't really make a lot of sense. Lets hope its worth it!

reply

"It's a Winterbottom film. The conceit and the process is more important than cheap, quick, or easy."

True. That could be a main reason why Winterbottom is one of my favourite directors.

"Dont let it end like this... tell them I said something."

reply

So what happens if one of the actors gets hit by a truck and killed? A lot of wierd stuff could happen in 5 years. Wouldn't it be easier to just get the hair and makeup people to age the characters??

reply

I'm sure that Winterbotton is smart enough to come up with something if an actor dies. It'll be part of the process. If he got 'the hair and makeup people to age the characters' it would be just another movie (well, not really since any of his films is just another film), but, anyway, it is more exciting and conceptual to take all this time.

reply

I guess that's just the director's style. It seems it would cost the company more money this way...or maybe not I don't know. But it would be awesome to be the actors since you got a guaranteed job for a few years.

reply

So then what do you think the duration would be? it has to be way over 20 hours of footage over 5 years.

reply

That's nothing - Richard Linklater has been making this movie http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1065073/ for about 12 years now.

reply

I realize this is a reply to an ancient post but since there seems to be a lot of confusion about the need for the 5 year shooting time - it has to do with the children. The four kids in the film age throughout and it's quite striking to see the small differences as they progress. It's pretty gradual but in the end you're deeply effected by how much the kids have changed (I felt this most strongly with the eldest boy). It's quite effective. Henderson and Simm don't really change all that much (in one scene he has a substantial beard)but the kids really evolve. It's amazing that they were able to reconnect and create a similar level of intimacy each year. For the younger kids - they probably wouldn't even remember their castmates from the previous shoot. Hard to wrap your head around. I'm sorry I had to run before the q&a because I would have loved to hear more about the process.

reply

Yes, and unfortunately this is the only interesting thing about the film. I rented it because of the critical acclaim, but the result of 5 years' filming is tedious, unless what you like to watch is paint drying. Very much "everyday" matters, but nothing painful about how the wife manages to bring up these kids on her own, with apparently no job and no struggle to make ends meet. Simm's jailed crim doesn't seem the type to have done anything bad enough for him to get banged up for 5 years, and he comes out of prison no different from when he went in. Five years of fairly idyllic rural life for the wife and kids, and five very unscary, very peaceful years for the prisoner. Do not confuse everyday life with real life, Michael.

reply

What, it was pretty exiting when the guy accepts sharing his wife. That is the core of the movie for Winterbottom

reply