MovieChat Forums > Bad Meat (2013) Discussion > Isn’t it a bit cheeky...

Isn’t it a bit cheeky...


Isn’t it a bit cheeky, releasing a film which obviously isn’t finished? I paid money to watch this!

I was quite enjoying it, and then suddenly it just ended abruptly after 80mins, without any explanations.

I thought the film was poorly paced, with scenes running for too long, and now I know why; they were trying to fill the runtime with the available material.

reply

I've just finished watching this and yes, it's really cheeky as the film goes nowhere! Best films ever:

Snakes on a Plane
Snakes on a Train
Snakes on a Crane
Snakes on Mark Twain

reply

I know it doesn't really matter anymore since these boards are about to be toast and I doubt anyone will ever read this, but I just have to say that this piece of s^^t is the most disgraceful supposed movie I've ever seen be released for sale.

It's not that the film goes nowhere, it's that there is no movie. It's an unfinished mess, from start to finish.

This thing was seemingly beset with all kinds of production problems (it ran out of money, maybe several times, at least 1 actor never returned when the shoot resumed at some point) that should have killed it for good. But these sneaky motherf^^kers instead cobbled together what footage they had and released it as a 'film'.

I've never seen another film where it was so obvious that whole chunks of the thing are missing, with characters just disappearing without explanation. The pacing of the scenes that they did have available is awful; it's obvious they just eked out every last frame of footage they had shot, for padding. It's also obvious they never actually filmed a real ending to this thing, with the events at the camp just stopping....no resolution, no explanations, nothing, just some fade out mid-scene bulls^^t.

It also made me laugh to see people on this board actually ask things like 'who do you think was under the bandages?', and for people to actually posit theories on who it could possibly be. I mean as if there was actually a fu^^ing answer. As if anything in the camp-set scenes actually connected to the hospital scenes. It's obvious these scenes were shot very fast and very cheap, to serve as a very loose, nonsensical framing device on which to hang the rest of the scenes around.

The fact that it pretty much has the same final shot as Troll 2 says more about this pile of garbage than I ever could. So yeah, f^^k this thing, and the cheeky, rat hack bast^^ds who thought they'd make money from selling a table with 3 missing legs.

Although having said all that, it still might not be Dave Franco's worst film.......







'And you can't p*ss on hospitality, I WON'T ALLOW IT!'

reply