MovieChat Forums > Lightyear (2022) Discussion > Leftists just don't get that the general...

Leftists just don't get that the general public is beyond sick and tired of the gay agenda


Keep the gay nonsense out of kids shows you child grooming evil people.

reply

Straight humans are instinctively wired to be repulsed by same sex affection, particularly as they begin puberty, and most people are straight.

Getting to them as kids is the only way the left can get adults to become less reactive to what their own instincts tell them is not natural.

I'm guessing that the left is willing to take a haircut now and hopefully get as many people on board their programs in the future.

reply

They're not going to wind their necks back in. You might as well expect a Mohammadan to renounce the Koran. It's just not going to happen. Much as the normie-cons think the answer is always to "vote harder", the degenerate leftists will resort to "groom harder".

This stuff is laying the groundwork for the normalization of kiddie diddling. Some of us tried to warn about this a couple decades ago as the push for gay civil unions took off. Either you are serious about the immutable immorality of same-sex relations or you're not.

reply

The kiss scene was unappropriate. I had to watch this with my Mother.

reply

Why did you have to watch the film with your mother? it was not rated R.

reply

You missed a chance to use the word homophobe yet again here....

reply

Well, if I was using it everywhere, then it was a missed chance. But I don't do that.

I'm still hoping to find out why CowliforniaDream had to watch Lightyear with their mom.

reply

She never leaves the TV room.

reply

YOU EDUCATION IS UNAPPROPRIATE.

reply

"You're" education is as well.

reply

EVERY LETTER WAS INTENTIONAL...SO,WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE REAL HOUSEWIVES SHOW?

reply

Sure it was

reply

YOU DON'T GET IT...IT'S OK...PRETTY FUNNY ACTUALLY.

reply

THANK YOU!!!

There was a time when we had almost NO gay characters AT ALL on tv or in movies, or they were in the background, or their character's orientation was left up for speculation. Otherwise, we had only straight characters in media for a long time, and people liked that. I wish our entertainment would go back to doing that, particularly for kids. Every time they stick one or more gay people right front and center on a tv show, it ruins the entire production for me. I'm tired of it.

reply

Then it seems that production was not intended for homophobes like yourself.

When did you come to realize that the entertainment industry does not revolve around you?

reply

Using the term homophobe everywhere will not change the truth that gay sex is completely unnatural, and the majority of natural people don't want to see it. That's life. Get used to it.

reply

Then it's a good thing I don't use the term homophobe everywhere. Why is anything that any two consenting adults can do, "unnatural".

Do you also think that any display of affection between two adults is unnatural unless it is strictly for reproduction?

reply

" Why is anything that any two consenting adults can do, "unnatural"? "

maybe since the dawn of time, the MAJORITY of humanity has said so. and always will. deal with it.

I honestly have NEVER CARED what people do with each other behind closed doors, golden showers, scat, skin hooks... knock yourselves out. but don't expect the vast majority to accept it as normal, and embrace it. it grosses us out. I've never had a problem until people now trying to tell us its normal....

AND try to shove it into our fucking KIDS movies.

keep it behind closed doors where it can roam free. EXACTLY like I, and millions of others do. I don't go around broadcasting MY personal shit out into the world. why do they have to?
do your thing, and be happy. and keep it to yourself, like the rest of us normal, rational, respectful, considerate, logical people do every fucking day of our life. and it is not a chore, just a responsibility.

reply

Why should the majority get to decide what the rest of the world can do? It is moral to force your beliefs on others?

How would you feel if someone objected to any public displays of affection that you are involved in? Would you respect their revulsion towards you?

If parents are wanting to shield their children from anything they might feel is objectionable, they they need to screen the film first prior to allowing their kids to watch it. That way the decent people in this world don't have to be subjected to their (your) intolerance.

So you think it is okay to use vulgar language on a public forum that kids might be reading? Why is vulgar behavior acceptable for you to indulge in, but no one else?

reply

Why should the majority get to decide...

because this is the reality of how the world works. if the majority decides I am a witch, I will burn. I can not fight back, being outnumbered, against a huge group of people. doesn't matter what I WISH about it, or how I FEEL.... a larger group will kick my ass.

do whatever you like on a public forum

reply

Isn't the cinema a public forum in a manner of speaking?

One of the nice things about a civilized society is that people with minority opinions can be protected from people like you who would stand by as the majority burned those they did not agree with.

Would you respect those who objected to your public displays of affection?

reply

[–] AmeriGirl26 (8049) 9 days ago
THANK YOU!!!

There was a time when we had almost NO gay characters AT ALL on tv or in movies, or they were in the background, or their character's orientation was left up for speculation. Otherwise, we had only straight characters in media for a long time, and people liked that. I wish our entertainment would go back to doing that, particularly for kids. Every time they stick one or more gay people right front and center on a tv show, it ruins the entire production for me. I'm tired of it.


WOW.

reply

I think most characters' orientation was irrelevant. In a cop show, who cares who the cop is married to? Most of the time their spouse is not even part of the show because it's about cops, not about their family! Then background characters: most of the time, you had no idea what the sexuality of those characters was. I always wonder if the statistics on inclusion of lgbt characters assume that all background characters are straight unless explicitly shown otherwise.

In general, you'd only expect a small proportion of shows to showcase a same sex relationship in the group of main characters because there just aren't that many main characters (5? 6?) in most shows. And yet every show I watch has an explicitly same sex relationship in it now. How do they do this? I think, in two ways. First, either a major character will have a same sex relationship that is centered in the show, or a same sex relationship is created for minor characters (that you wouldn't even know their sexuality if the show were older, like the dispatcher who sits at the front desk of the police station, who says two or three lines per show). And, because of the way screenplays are constructed, if you want to center explicitly lgbtq relationships on screen, then the whole show has to be built around a theme that is relevant to lgbtq issues, otherwise the on-screen relationship doesn't fit into the show. So the result has been that every show in the last few years has basically ended up being more or less about lgbtq issues.

A current example, the tv series Ghosts. I quite like this series but within a few episodes one of the characters was shown to be a closeted gay man and it became a bigger and bigger part of the show, and eventually I realized that's what the whole show is about. The ghosts are just a metaphor for people who are hurting because they are excluded for being lgbtq. That is why every show nowadays seems the same as every other show, they all are about basically the same thing.

reply

And you wonder why I don't watch mainstream tv anymore. It's only made for the rainbow mafia, nobody else. They would be better off having a tv channel exclusively for them where their tv shows and movies can be as gay as they want, and leave the rest of us alone.

reply

That's not going to happen but I wouldn't mind if there was a channel for shows about something else. I mean, I don't mind lgbtq issues but not everything has to be about that. The other thing is that, now that I understand how it works, I look back and realize that all the tv I've been watching for my entire life has been about pushing particular agendas. There are very few themes that are explored, they are all variations on a few political topics, and the viewpoint is always the same. TV is a monoculture.

When I really started noticing it is with female characters. All the women are "strong" which it turns out means selfish. My goodness the women on tv are selfish nowadays. And we are all supposed to admire how strong and independent they are for looking out for themselves. I cannot relate to these women at all. I can't stay interested in the shows. That is what made me start thinking about it more, was when I couldn't relate to any of the women on tv. Self-absorbed, self-aggrandizing, you name it. I don't know, it just doesn't speak to me.

reply

They also don't show normal families anymore. All they ever wanta show are broken families, gigantic, ridiculous families in one big house (usually not white anymore), a "family" of unrelated people at college, or gay couples. They almost never show heterosexual couples that have a good relationship anymore, never mind a family that isn't wanting to kill each other. I also get tired of seeing every "coming-of-age" teen story being about some teen coming out of the closet, terrified their parents will throw them out, and the parents are always understanding about it, rather than being realistic. It's why my dad calls ABC the "GayBC" channel these days. All Christians are shown to be nutty bigots, like the only models these shitty writers use is the Westboro Baptist Church to portray Christians of any kind. They make Catholics out to be very liberal, when many aren't.

I've seen "strong" female characters that people loved in the past, and they were nothing like the snotty, arrogant, feminazi bitches with badly-written personalities they have now. I can't relate to the Mary Sues either. It's particularly stupid how they are portrayed as the smartest and best at everything, and all the men are either idiots, or have to be kept on a leash by these bitches, or they'll cause trouble.

Again, there's a reason I've been watching less and less mainstream tv and movies these days. A lot of the writing sucks. My brother has lower standards and continues to watch, but he has to fast-forward through the agenda stuff on there. I told him several times "If you have to fast-forward through it, and have no interest in watching it again later, that doesn't speak well on how good the show is."

reply

"I can't relate to the Mary Sues either. It's particularly stupid how they are portrayed as the smartest and best at everything, and all the men are either idiots, or have to be kept on a leash "

Yyyyep. And I'm a woman! I think women are terrific; but these women don't reflect me at all. I don't see myself in them. They are designed to stroke the ego of a certain type of female viewer that has gotten to the top by being selfish and arrogant. Hmm, wonder why that is. Maybe because the women who write for those shows ARE women who got to the top by being selfish and arrogant? I feel these women really look down on women like me. Ugh.

reply

Pretty much describes every liberal woman in Hollyweird and in the Democratic party. Some of the most destructive people I have met are liberal women, particularly the white ones. They're the ones who have pushed for some of the worst changes America has had to endure, and they can sometimes be even more arrogant, selfish, hypocritical, vicious, and bigoted than the sexist men they displaced.

reply

YEAH!...SEGREGATE THOSE BASTARDS!😐

reply

How is showing a quick peck on the lips between two women an example of an agenda?

reply

It is extreme homophobia.

reply

Using the term homophobe everywhere will not change the truth that gay sex is completely unnatural, and the majority of natural people don't want to see it. That's life. Get used to it.

reply

Then it's a good thing I don't use the term homophobe everywhere. Why is anything that any two consenting adults can do, "unnatural".

Do you also think that any display of affection between two adults is unnatural unless it is strictly for reproduction?

reply

I know gay people who are sick of the gay agenda. And that's a true statement.

reply

Who?

reply

People I work with.

reply

What are their names?

reply

You want their numbers too?

Settle down Casanova 🤣.

reply

Just trying to understand if they are real people.

Probably they aren't

reply

What parts of that agenda are they tired of? The gay marriage part?

reply

The forced perversion they're shoving down everybody's throats.

reply

Homosexuality is not a perversion. Do you also think sex outside of marriage and for reason other than reproduction is a perversion? Some people who are as bigoted as you think so.

reply

Are straight people parading through the streets wearing skimpy outfits showing everybody how straight we are?

reply

Straights are everywhere with skimpy outfits. Don't you ever get outside in tropical or subtropical climates in the summer?

One of the nice things about being stationed in Hawaii for ten years was the thousands of tourists and locals in skimpy skirts and shorts in town.

Are you purposing avoiding any sight of skin while outside?

reply

Why do care what I think so much?

reply

It seems you're just posting the usual trivial nonsense all the bigots who hate homosexuals say. I was wondering if I could coax anything intelligent out of you. I have failed to do so of course.

reply

Fine, you want to hear an intelligent statement?
If the gay community wants to be accepted as "equals" and have others stop being so "homophobic", maybe they should stop shoving their agenda down people's throats the way this current "gay movement" is doing so abrasively. It's only going to have the opposite effect and cause backlash. Since when has forcing people to accept something ever had a positive outcome? That's why a lot of gays are disgusted by this "in your face" gay campaign that's oversaturating everything. They just want to blend in naturally which was working fine. Tell me I don't have a point.

reply

Exactly! Well put.
Do your GAY thing, shut the fuck up about, live life EXACTLY LIKE THE REST OF US: Doing our thing, shutting the fuck up about it.

Worried about gay people being picked on and beat up? Guess what: This will never change - EXACTLY LIKE EVERY OTHER CRIME THAT STILL HAPPENS EVEN THOUGH MANY LAWS EXIST AGAINST CRIMES.
Robbery is illegal - still happens.
Murder is illegal - still happens.
BAD people exist and do bad things. Nothing will ever change this.
This is life. Shut the fuck up, learn your regular place, and just live.

like the rest of us.

reply

True that!

reply

Did you know that part of the gay agenda is refusing to allow gays being picked on and beat up as normal? Another part of the gay agenda is that they think their place is right along side of other Americans and not in "their place" whatever you think that is.

What is the gay "regular place"?

reply

Reread my post is all spelled out right there. Place is exactly where everyone s is. Same. Reread it over and over until you understand. Not going to keep saying the same thing over and over because you don't get it.

reply

The thing is you want gays to live like the you. There is a problem with that, it's a free country. Straights do not shut the fuck up about being straight. Some of them (like you) want everyone else to be straight like them. And I'm sure that straight like them is a special kind of straight that only they recognize.

If you learned your place, which was along side everyone else who behaved in a moral manner, including gays, then the rest of us could live a lot more peacefully.

If you want gays to be like you, then perhaps you can meet them halfway and be more gay? I'm not about to do that as I'm straight, but good luck to you.

Part of your problem is that you think generalities and profanity take the place of rational thoughts and words.

reply

dude, you are not able to comprehend simple posts. 3/4 of what you said is flat out wrong, thus, not worth responding to

reply

No marginalized part of society gets their due rights by "staying in their place". Women had to shout, scream and be arrested prior to getting their right to vote protected by law. They had to force that issue down the throats of bigots like you.

The bravest people are the ones who confront the bigots whoa re trying to keep them down. Some others just don't have the stomach for it.

You also need to know your place, along side fellow Americans no matter who they are.

reply

Negative. The LGBTQAEIOU and sometimes Y community is going about it all wrong for the reasons I mentioned above.

reply

So what is worth marching in the streets for?

reply

I dont think ranb is really listening, and or refuses to hear. Just wasting our time.

reply

Because he has no argument.

reply

yup.
but they never seem to see it that way.

if 96 out of a 100 people tell someone they are stupid, there is a very high probability that they are, or at least qualify as what the majority of humans decided was "stupid", even if they don't see the stupid within themselves.

"tis but a scratch!"
"A scratch?? You're arm's off!"
"No it isn't"
"Well, what's THAT then??"
"I've had worse"
"You lie!"
"Come on, you panzy!"

that comedy rings so familiar! :D

reply

Yep, if you're not with them, you're sister them.

reply

The only gay guy i know who has never been with a woman hates the gay agenda and loves to call them the F Slur so i believe you and i don't even need names and addresses, i just draw off my real life experience and if in my real life experience the one openly gay man i know hates the gay agenda which would be an indicator that a majority of gay men hate the gay agenda as im most likely to get a majority but im supposed to assume that the Liberal Bot Farms of the Internet are the true majority? Likewise the only openly gay woman i know who slept with more men than i slept with women is now 100% gay and supports all these causes and it has nothing at all to do with her history of being a hardcore leftist political hack?

reply

good stuff.

we need more normal, regular, average, typical people, gay or straight, to speak out against this nutty agenda junk voice, and get back to real world life. straight or gay, do your thing, be happy there and move on.
Gays: no one's repressing you, no one is beating you up - except for criminals which no society has ever stopped ever, just live and act normal and you ARE normal and fit in just fine.

did you know that straight people get beat up too??? yeah! It's a real thing! OMG the horrors!!! :D

heck, other than the obvious flamers, half the people I run across in life could be gay and I would never know. or care. gays I do know, are cool, adult about life, are fun, and overall happy.

reply

Here are the "family values" people who are so frightened of the "gay agenda" that they're pissing their pants over the suggestion that a brief same sex kiss scene in a film will turn their kids gay no matter how hard they groom them to be alt-right intolerable freaks.

https://imgur.com/gallery/G9DZjzl

reply

What school is that in?

reply

Don't know. Does it matter? Do you think it is not in the USA?

reply

People are concerned with this subject being taught to young children in public schools.

While the example those parents are setting for their children is ridiculous, it isn't a tax payer funded school.

reply

Do you approve of how they're grooming those kids?

reply

Nope.

reply

Like Bugs Bunny in drag? https://cdn.gaystarnews.com/uploads/2016/08/Bugs-Bunny.jpg Did Bugs in a dress make you gay?

reply

How's your gay fight going? Converted any one to your agenda yet?

reply

I don't have a sexuality agenda, unless Taco Tuesday is what you're talking about. I do have a pro-gun agenda that Trump was doing his best to destroy.

reply

Just SJWing at its finest? Helping those who lack the ability to help themselves? Very well, carry on. :)

reply