MovieChat Forums > Vinyan (2008) Discussion > Disappointing For The Horror Fan.

Disappointing For The Horror Fan.


This review is to serve as a warning to the horror fan. Sadly, however, not the kind of warning that might accompany the discussion of movies such as A Serbian Film. Vinyan promotes itself heavily as a horror film. Cover images and posters feature demonic looking children surrounded by skulls on spikes, and bodies hanging out of trees. The blurb tells us that “when someone dies a horrible death, their spirit becomes confused and angry, it becomes ‘Vinyan’”. Whilst the wonderful thing about the genre is its breadth, Vinyan barely qualifies – despite masquerading as horror. It does warrant discussion though, if only for the aforementioned cautionary note.

Vinyan opens to a beautifully shot sequence of underwater bubbles in slow motion, which eventually fuse with dark human hair. It then immerses us in the vibrant seediness of Thai nightlife. The characters of Jeanne (Emmanuelle Beart) and Paul (Rufus Sewell) are capably developed as they struggle to cope with the loss of their son who is missing, presumed dead, in the Asian tsunami disaster. When Jeanne thinks she recognises the missing boy in video footage shot recently in Burma, the couple undertake to illegally enter Burmese territory with the help of Triad gangsters to search for their son in the marshes and jungles of that inhospitable landscape.

With such an exciting premise in a terrifying and evocative setting, it is such a shame that this film largely fails. Just before the hour mark, the film tangibly starts ebbing away and the suspension of disbelief that had initially been built went shortly after. That willingness to want to take this journey with the characters on an adventure which surely must be full of horrors was absent as the realisation set in that very little of interest was going to happen.

Some ambiguity in a film, especially a horror film, is a good thing. It is deeply effective to allow the mind to fill in the blanks and to provoke human nature into wondering “why?” However Vinyan has too much ambiguity and it is not delivered with the necessary writing skill to be effective. There are too few nuances and pointers to justify the lack of conclusion, which ultimately makes wondering about the films motive pointless. Being too vague about what is happening takes the viewer out of the film, and prevents immersion and belief in its fiction.

There is a fine moment of horror in the conclusion – the gang of children seen throughout the film (who may or may not be of supernatural origin) mob a character who is then impaled on spikes and disembowelled! This alone is not sufficient to recommend watching the film, which ultimately failed to deliver on its initial potential, despite its talented cast and stunning cinematography.

THIS REVIEW AND MORE AT:
WWW.TRANSGRESSIVECINEMA.COM

**********************
My horror review site:

www.transgressivecinema.com

reply

horror is my favorite genre. And I liked this film, works as a drama and as a horror movie as well.

But everyone has their own opinion. Just don't assume or jump to conclusions about a person's taste.

reply

This is intellectual horror in the style of classics like Don't Look Now. Meatheads looking for gore and cheap scares won't find anything interesting here. If you're looking for sophisticated horror that requires you to think and interpret than you will find plenty here.

Last seen movies:
Animal Kingdom 8/10
Staunton Hill 3/10
Mary & Max 9/10

reply

To lable those who don't share your point of view "meatheads" is somewhat, well, meathead-ish!

Vinyan was not without its positives, but for my tastes it didn't work as visual horror or on a more insidious, subtle level. I don't really think it's a very intellectual film either!

Comparing it to a classic like "Don't Look Now" is criminal.



**********************
My horror review site:

www.transgressivecinema.com

reply

"To lable those who don't share your point of view "meatheads" is somewhat, well, meathead-ish!"

That's true, but I wasn't necessarily referring to you. I was referring to the torture porn crowd who only consider a movie a horror movie, if there's enough blood and guts on display all the time.

Last seen movies:
Zeitgeist: Addendum ???/10
The Loved Ones 6/10
Blue Valentine 9/10

reply

It definately fits into the horror category. I thought it was unsettling and atmospheric, and it`s obviously influenced by Don`t Look Now, and there was a Texas Chainsaw Massacre dinner table scene in there as well. It`s definately a film to be rewatched and I`d take it over your bog standard formulaic Horror film anyday.

If you keep an open mind... you`ll discover dark secrets.

reply

I'm a huge horror fan, it's probably my favorite genre and I really liked this film. The first hour was kind of typical but the last 30 minutes were really weird. The cinematography was great and it was well acted.

reply

I didn't feel it was all that scary... I mean I felt this was "Apocalypse Now Meets Peter Pan's Lost Boys."
Now I'm not saying the film sucked... I DID like it. But I wouldn't call it a "horror" film.
Just my opinion...

Trust me,
Swan
My, you're nosey, aren't you?

reply