more or less accurate, more or less manipulative
John Pilger takes on an important subject here, obviously. I think his point probably would have been made more strongly if the film hadn't seemed quite so propagandistic. It's designed to appeal to people who already agree with him, and I doubt it did much to convince anyone else. And I'm speaking as someone who is very much on Pilger's side politically.
It's easy to demonize someone like Duane Clarridge (all you have to do is film him), but what does that teach us, really? That there's at least one unapologetic, belligerently pro-American guy in the CIA. No big news there.
I suppose I'm being excessively harsh because flag waving gives me the creeps, whether it's an American flag, an anarchist flag, or a John Pilger flag. It's a good film and well worth seeing. It just suffers from "Michael Moore syndrome": entertaining, relevant, important, and incredibly biased.
I agree with most of what Pilger and Moore say about the USA. However I don't agree that the poor (in Pilger's case), or Canada, UK, France, or pretty much any country other than the USA (in Moore's case) are universally noble, well-meaning, benign, and good looking too. It's a fantasy that American liberals love to fall for because they're so sick of the dicks who run their country.
In Pilger's favour, he doesn't fall for Obama-mania: http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=492