MovieChat Forums > Pig Hunt (2008) Discussion > too much nudity

too much nudity

posted 14 years ago by homeautopsykit
11 replies | jump to latest

This movie would have been fun if it wasn't for all the nudity. Do they really need that much, it was like a soft core porn. Next time try working out the story a little better and stop using tits, ass and vaginas for filler. It's uncalled for, why did they even need wardrobe?

[–] DrHerbertWest 13 years ago

^ Worst. Post Ever.

[–] The_Man_in_the_Planet 13 years ago

Asses and vaginas? Um, did we watch the same movie?

Next time you see me, it won't be me

[–] jjk50 13 years ago

There were no vaginas in the movie. I definetely would have noticed.

[–] doncraw 13 years ago

agreed

[–] doncraw 13 years ago

agreed

[–] MovieMutt 13 years ago

The picture they drew the map on had a vagina.

"You have no power over me."

[–] Promontorium 11 years ago

No it didn't. It seemed to be airbrushed out. Also interesting is there was no pubic hair, and yet the guy references it as where they were on the map.

[–] redrum760 11 years ago

no, where they were on the map was the top(face, head or whatever) ...the puss was what they were looking for or where they were headed. conviently, her breast represented a hill on the way...

I DO CROSSWORD PUZZLES IN PEN CUZ IM JUST THAT CONFIDENT

[–] A-Pseudo-Intellectual 13 years ago

Prudey McPrude is being a prude. Seriously, there's nothing offensive about a few topless hippy girls. Unless, of course, you're an evangelic who can't even look at him/herself naked.

"I was cured, all right."

[–] gold167 12 years ago

No vaginas only upper torso only

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]